The Saccade Main Sequence in Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa and Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: Most eye-movement studies in patients with visual field defects have examined the strategies that patients use while exploring a visual scene, but they have not investigated saccade kinematics. In healthy vision, saccade trajectories follow the remarkably stereotyped "main sequence": saccade duration increases linearly with saccade amplitude; peak velocity also increases linearly for small amplitudes, but approaches a saturation limit for large amplitudes. Recent theories propose that these relationships reflect the brain's attempt to optimize vision when planning eye movements. Therefore, in patients with bilateral retinal damage, saccadic behavior might differ to optimize vision under the constraints imposed by the visual field defects. METHODS: We compared saccadic behavior of patients with central vision loss, due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and patients with peripheral vision loss, due to retinitis pigmentosa (RP), to that of controls with normal vision (NV) using a horizontal saccade task. RESULTS: Both patient groups demonstrated deficits in saccade reaction times and target localization behavior, as well as altered saccade kinematics. Saccades were generally slower and the shape of the velocity profiles were often atypical, especially in the patients with RP. In the patients with AMD, the changes were far less dramatic. For both groups, saccade kinematics were affected most when the target was in the subjects' blind field. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that defects of the central and peripheral retina have distinct effects on the saccade main sequence, and that visual inputs play an important role in planning the kinematics of a saccade

Estimating Phosphene Locations Using Eye Movements of Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis Users.

PURPOSE: Accurate mapping of phosphene locations from visual prostheses is vital to encode spatial information. This process may involve the subject pointing to evoked phosphene locations with their finger. Here, we demonstrate phosphene mapping for a retinal implant using eye movements and compare it with retinotopic electrode positions and previous results using conventional finger-based mapping. METHODS: Three suprachoroidal retinal implant recipients (NCT03406416) indicated the spatial position of phosphenes. Electrodes were stimulated individually, and the subjects moved their finger (finger based) or their eyes (gaze based) to the perceived phosphene location. The distortion of the measured phosphene locations from the expected locations (retinotopic electrode locations) was characterized with Procrustes analysis. RESULTS: The finger-based phosphene locations were compressed spatially relative to the expected locations all three subjects, but preserved the general retinotopic arrangement (scale factors ranged from 0.37 to 0.83). In two subjects, the gaze-based phosphene locations were similar to the expected locations (scale factors of 0.72 and 0.99). For the third subject, there was no apparent relationship between gaze-based phosphene locations and electrode locations (scale factor of 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Gaze-based phosphene mapping was achievable in two of three tested retinal prosthesis subjects and their derived phosphene maps correlated well with the retinotopic electrode layout. A third subject could not produce a coherent gaze-based phosphene map, but this may have revealed that their phosphenes were indistinct spatially. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Gaze-based phosphene mapping is a viable alternative to conventional finger-based mapping, but may not be suitable for all subjects