De Raíz Diversa. Revista Especializada en Estudios Latinoamericanos (Vol. 1 no. 2 oct-dic 2014)

/Índice/ Autores que colaboran en este número > 9; Editorial > 13; /Artículos/ Oficio de historiador, ¿nuevo paradigma o positivismo? -Carlos Barros > 17; Desafíos de las Ciencias Sociales en América Latina. La experiencia en México. -Carlos Hernández Alcántara > 49; México y América Latina sujetos a la vulnerabilidad externa. -Arturo Huerta González > 69; Sertão Digital. Estudo de caso acerca do uso da Internet em Várzea Alegre, CE. -Maria Erica de Oliveira Lima, Priscila Dallva de Oliveira Falcã > 101; Pranchada infamante: Resistência ao castigo físico do soldado imperial na Guerra contra o Paraguai. -Mário Maestri > 125; Un proyecto de modernidad católico: el Ecuador de García Moreno. -Perla P. Valero Pacheco > 155 El mito del bilingüismo y la colonización lingüística en Paraguay. -Gaya Makaran > 183; Las primeras aproximaciones de la política exterior de Brasil en África y la utilización de las prácticas culturales de la población negra brasileña. -Mónica Velasco Molina > 213; /Reseñas/ Gustavo Ogarrio Badillo.Breve historia de la transición y el olvido. Una lectura de la democratización en América Latina. -Orlando Lima Rocha > 247; Carlos Oliva.Semiótica y capitalismo. Ensayos sobre la obra de Bolívar Echeverría. -Alejandro Fernando González Jiménez > 253; Eduardo Subirats.Mito y literatura: revalorar el simbolismo mitológico. -Carlos Pineda > 259; David Gómez Arredondo.Calibán en cuestión. Aproximaciones teóricas y filosóficas desde nuestra América. -Jaime Ortega Reyna > 265

Age and skill bias of trade liberalisation? : heterogeneous employment effects of EU Eastern Enlargement

This study analyses the 2004 Eastern Enlargement to the European Union to obtain evidence on the employment effects of an increase in trade liberalisation. The Enlargement is thought to generate a trade-induced demand shock with no (or only limited) supply effects. Besides the variation over time induced by the Enlargement, identification of the effects is based on a Melitz (2003) type productivity term to differentiate firms by the extent of exposure to the demand shock. The idea is that the effects of the demand shock should be driven by differences in firm-level productivity from the period before the new member countries actually entered the EU. German linked employer-employee data allow to observe the relation of initial establishment productivity with employment changes over a long panel from 1995 to 2009. The estimates show that the Enlargement had a negative effect on establishment-level employment growth, which is driven by increased worker separations and increased job destruction. Besides the overall employment effect, the study focuses on effect heterogeneity across age and skill groups of the workforce. These estimates point to a skill bias in the effect of the Enlargement that disadvantages low- and medium-skilled workers in terms of higher worker separation and job destruction. In addition, lowskilled workers suffer fewer accessions by firms, where against medium-skilled workers enjoy increased accessions and creation of new jobs. Besides this indication for a skill bias, there are no clear indications that point to an age bias in the employment effect of the Eastern Enlargement

Inequality of opportunity in the land of opportunities : 1968-2001

We measure inequality of opportunity for earnings acquisition in the U.S. between 1968 and 2001. Following recent theories of social justice, earnings determinants are divided into two parts: Circumstances, which are characteristics outside individual control and effort representing factors impacting earnings but under individuals’ responsibility. Equality of opportunity requires that inequality of circumstances must be corrected while differences of effort must remain unaltered. Circumstances are represented by parental education and occupation, ethnic origin, place of birth and age. Effort is modeled with schooling choices and labour supply decisions. Using the PSID from 1968 to 2001, we provide two alternative assessments of inequality of opportunity using counterfactual distributions. The statistical framework is semi-parametric and builds on duration models. Finally, we conclude that inequality of opportunity represents between 20 and 43% of earnings inequality, but decreases all over the period reaching around 18% in 2001