Implementing a national programme of pathogen genomics for public health: the Australian Pathogen Genomics Program (AusPathoGen).

Delivering large-scale routine pathogen genomics surveillance for public health is of considerable interest, although translational research models that promote national-level implementation are not well defined. We describe the development and deployment of the Australian Pathogen Genomics Program (AusPathoGen), a comprehensive national partnership between academia, public health laboratories, and public health agencies that commenced in January, 2021. Successfully establishing and delivering a national programme requires inclusive and transparent collaboration between stakeholders, defined and clear focus on public health priorities, and support for strengthening national genomics capacity. Major enablers for delivering such a programme include technical solutions for data integration and analysis, such as the genomics surveillance platform AusTrakka, standard bioinformatic analysis methods, and national ethics and data sharing agreements that promote nationally integrated surveillance systems. Training of public health officials to interpret and act on genomic data is crucial, and evaluation and cost-effectiveness programmes will provide a benchmark and evidence for sustainable investment in genomics nationally and globally

Economic evaluations of whole-genome sequencing for pathogen identification in public health surveillance and health-care-associated infections: a systematic review

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has resulted in improvements to pathogen characterisation for the rapid investigation and management of disease outbreaks and surveillance. We conducted a systematic review to synthesise the economic evidence of WGS implementation for pathogen identification and surveillance. Of the 2285 unique publications identified through online database searches, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. The economic evidence to support the broader application of WGS as a front-line pathogen characterisation and surveillance tool is insufficient and of low quality. WGS has been evaluated in various clinical settings, but these evaluations are predominantly investigations of a single pathogen. There are also considerable variations in the evaluation approach. Economic evaluations of costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness are needed to support the implementation of WGS in public health settings.Full Tex