Preferences for Patient Cost Sharing Among Medicare Beneficiaries after HMO Plan Withdrawals

OBJECTIVE: To assess Medicare beneficiaries' willingness to cost share in order to minimize disruptions in coverage from HMO plan withdrawals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of Medicare beneficiaries from February 1999 to March 1999. SETTING: Ten U.S. counties with the highest HMO plan withdrawal rates. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred one Medicare beneficiaries for response rate of 69%. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Percentage of respondents willing to accept more out-of-pocket costs in order to continue their Medicare HMO coverage. Most respondents (67%) were willing to pay more out-of-pocket costs so that their HMO could have continued Medicare coverage. Those who were white (P = .03), had higher incomes (P = .01), and returned to traditional fee-for-service Medicare (P = .004) were more likely than other respondents to accept increased patient cost sharing. Most beneficiaries preferred Medicare policies requiring HMOs to sign longer-term Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) contracts (72%) and to offer coverage to beneficiaries regardless of where they lived in a given state (87%). However, respondents' preferences for such policy options were not associated with the amount of cost sharing that respondents were willing to accept. CONCLUSIONS: Most Medicare beneficiaries are willing to accept increased patient cost sharing in order to reduce disruptions in their HMO coverage. Policies intended to reduce HMO plan withdrawals, such as requiring health plans to sign longer-term HCFA contracts, are supported by many Medicare beneficiaries, but these policy preferences were not related to willingness to cost share. In light of an apparent willingness to pay more out-of-pocket medical costs, Medicare beneficiaries in general may accept increased cost sharing in order to retain their HMO coverage

Physician Perception of Pay Fairness and its Association with Work Satisfaction, Intent to Leave Practice, and Personal Health

BackgroundPrimary care physicians generally earn less than specialists. Studies of other occupations have identified perception of pay fairness as a predictor of work- and life-related outcomes. We evaluated whether physicians' pay fairness perceptions were associated with their work satisfaction, turnover intention, and personal health.MethodsThree thousand five hundred eighty-nine physicians were surveyed. Agreement with "my total compensation is fair" was used to assess pay fairness perceptions. Total compensation was self-reported, and we used validated measures of work satisfaction, likelihood of leaving current practice, and health status. Hierarchical logistic regressions were used to assess the associations between pay fairness perceptions and work/life-related outcomes.ResultsA total of 2263 physicians completed surveys. Fifty-seven percent believed their compensation was fair; there was no difference between physicians in internal medicine and non-primary care specialties (P = 0.58). Eighty-three percent were satisfied at work, 70% reported low likelihood of leaving their practice, and 77% rated their health as very good or excellent. Higher compensation levels were associated with greater work satisfaction and lower turnover intention, but most associations became statistically non-significant after adjusting for pay fairness perceptions. Perceived pay fairness was associated with greater work satisfaction (OR, 4.90; 95% CI, 3.94-6.08; P < 0.001), lower turnover intention (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 2.01-3.01; P < 0.001), and better health (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.08-1.65; P < 0.01).DiscussionPhysicians who thought their pay was fair reported greater work satisfaction, lower likelihood of leaving their practice, and better overall health. Addressing pay fairness perceptions may be important for sustaining a satisfied and healthy physician workforce, which is necessary to deliver high-quality care

Patients' Trust in Their Physicians: Effects of Choice, Continuity, and Payment Method

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent to which physician choice, length of patient-physician relationship, and perceived physician payment method predict patients' trust in their physician. DESIGN: Survey of patients of physicians in Atlanta, Georgia. PATIENTS: Subjects were 292 patients aged 18 years and older. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Scale of patients' trust in their physician was the main outcome measure. Most patients completely trusted their physicians “to put their needs above all other considerations” (69%). Patients who reported having enough choice of physician (p < .05), a longer relationship with the physician (p < .001), and who trusted their managed care organization (p < .001) were more likely to trust their physician. Approximately two thirds of all respondents did not know the method by which their physician was paid. The majority of patients believed paying a physician each time a test is done rather than a fixed monthly amount would not affect their care (72.4%). However, 40.5% of all respondents believed paying a physician more for ordering fewer than the average number of tests would make their care worse. Of these patients, 53.3% would accept higher copayments to obtain necessary medical tests. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' trust in their physician is related to having a choice of physicians, having a longer relationship with their physician, and trusting their managed care organization. Most patients are unaware of their physician's payment method, but many are concerned about payment methods that might discourage medical use

Not All Patients Want to Participate in Decision Making: A National Study of Public Preferences

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine calls for physicians to engage patients in making clinical decisions, but not every patient may want the same level of participation. OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess public preferences for participation in decision making in a representative sample of the U.S. population. 2) To understand how demographic variables and health status influence people's preferences for participation in decision making. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based survey of a fully representative sample of English-speaking adults was conducted in concert with the 2002 General Social Survey (N= 2,765). Respondents expressed preferences ranging from patient-directed to physician-directed styles on each of 3 aspects of decision making (seeking information, discussing options, making the final decision). Logistic regression was used to assess the relationships of demographic variables and health status to preferences. MAIN RESULTS: Nearly all respondents (96%) preferred to be offered choices and to be asked their opinions. In contrast, half of the respondents (52%) preferred to leave final decisions to their physicians and 44% preferred to rely on physicians for medical knowledge rather than seeking out information themselves. Women, more educated, and healthier people were more likely to prefer an active role in decision making. African-American and Hispanic respondents were more likely to prefer that physicians make the decisions. Preferences for an active role increased with age up to 45 years, but then declined. CONCLUSION: This population-based study demonstrates that people vary substantially in their preferences for participation in decision making. Physicians and health care organizations should not assume that patients wish to participate in clinical decision making, but must assess individual patient preferences and tailor care accordingly