Guiding CTC Posterior Spike Timings for Improved Posterior Fusion and Knowledge Distillation

Conventional automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems trained from frame-level alignments can easily leverage posterior fusion to improve ASR accuracy and build a better single model with knowledge distillation. End-to-end ASR systems trained using the Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) loss do not require frame-level alignment and hence simplify model training. However, sparse and arbitrary posterior spike timings from CTC models pose a new set of challenges in posterior fusion from multiple models and knowledge distillation between CTC models. We propose a method to train a CTC model so that its spike timings are guided to align with those of a pre-trained guiding CTC model. As a result, all models that share the same guiding model have aligned spike timings. We show the advantage of our method in various scenarios including posterior fusion of CTC models and knowledge distillation between CTC models with different architectures. With the 300-hour Switchboard training data, the single word CTC model distilled from multiple models improved the word error rates to 13.7%/23.1% from 14.9%/24.1% on the Hub5 2000 Switchboard/CallHome test sets without using any data augmentation, language model, or complex decoder.Comment: Accepted to Interspeech 201

Direct Acoustics-to-Word Models for English Conversational Speech Recognition

Recent work on end-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR) has shown that the connectionist temporal classification (CTC) loss can be used to convert acoustics to phone or character sequences. Such systems are used with a dictionary and separately-trained Language Model (LM) to produce word sequences. However, they are not truly end-to-end in the sense of mapping acoustics directly to words without an intermediate phone representation. In this paper, we present the first results employing direct acoustics-to-word CTC models on two well-known public benchmark tasks: Switchboard and CallHome. These models do not require an LM or even a decoder at run-time and hence recognize speech with minimal complexity. However, due to the large number of word output units, CTC word models require orders of magnitude more data to train reliably compared to traditional systems. We present some techniques to mitigate this issue. Our CTC word model achieves a word error rate of 13.0%/18.8% on the Hub5-2000 Switchboard/CallHome test sets without any LM or decoder compared with 9.6%/16.0% for phone-based CTC with a 4-gram LM. We also present rescoring results on CTC word model lattices to quantify the performance benefits of a LM, and contrast the performance of word and phone CTC models.Comment: Submitted to Interspeech-201

Building competitive direct acoustics-to-word models for English conversational speech recognition

Direct acoustics-to-word (A2W) models in the end-to-end paradigm have received increasing attention compared to conventional sub-word based automatic speech recognition models using phones, characters, or context-dependent hidden Markov model states. This is because A2W models recognize words from speech without any decoder, pronunciation lexicon, or externally-trained language model, making training and decoding with such models simple. Prior work has shown that A2W models require orders of magnitude more training data in order to perform comparably to conventional models. Our work also showed this accuracy gap when using the English Switchboard-Fisher data set. This paper describes a recipe to train an A2W model that closes this gap and is at-par with state-of-the-art sub-word based models. We achieve a word error rate of 8.8%/13.9% on the Hub5-2000 Switchboard/CallHome test sets without any decoder or language model. We find that model initialization, training data order, and regularization have the most impact on the A2W model performance. Next, we present a joint word-character A2W model that learns to first spell the word and then recognize it. This model provides a rich output to the user instead of simple word hypotheses, making it especially useful in the case of words unseen or rarely-seen during training.Comment: Submitted to IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 201

O-1: Self-training with Oracle and 1-best Hypothesis

We introduce O-1, a new self-training objective to reduce training bias and unify training and evaluation metrics for speech recognition. O-1 is a faster variant of Expected Minimum Bayes Risk (EMBR), that boosts the oracle hypothesis and can accommodate both supervised and unsupervised data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in terms of recognition on publicly available SpeechStew datasets and a large-scale, in-house data set. On Speechstew, the O-1 objective closes the gap between the actual and oracle performance by 80\% relative compared to EMBR which bridges the gap by 43\% relative. O-1 achieves 13\% to 25\% relative improvement over EMBR on the various datasets that SpeechStew comprises of, and a 12\% relative gap reduction with respect to the oracle WER over EMBR training on the in-house dataset. Overall, O-1 results in a 9\% relative improvement in WER over EMBR, thereby speaking to the scalability of the proposed objective for large-scale datasets