L’esperienza del forum prorogatum negli arbitrati in Italia e all’estero

The article deals with the recognition of the principle of forum prorogatum in arbitrations between private parties or between private parties and foreign States. The analysis begins in the interstate jurisdictions, where the principle first developed. However, following a thorough reconstruction of international treaty law, national legislation, and relevant case law, the Author demonstrates its prevalence in private arbitration as well. The applicability of the principle of forum prorogatum in arbitral jurisdictions can be inferred from general principles of law. Nonetheless, its practicality often depends on the choices of national legislators. Consequently, forum prorogatum undoubtedly functions if the legal system in which the arbitration is being held impedes the objection of the award for reasons related to the arbitration agreement which were not contested during the course of the arbitration. On the contrary, doubts arise in the case in which that preclusive mechanism is not provided for. Nevertheless, in the Author's opinion, the principle of forum prorogatum finds application regardless of the system of preclusions, since its applicability is owed to reasons of a logicaldogmatic nature. The only limit to its practicality may be the provision of an express legal prohibition. The Author also focuses on the change introduced in Italy by the 2006 reform with the combined provision of law of articles 817, 3º co. and 819, 1º co., num. 1), c.p.c.The article deals with the recognition of the principle of forum prorogatum in arbitrations between private parties or between private parties and foreign States. The analysis begins in the interstate jurisdictions, where the principle first developed. However, following a thorough reconstruction of international treaty law, national legislation, and relevant case law, the Author demonstrates its prevalence in private arbitration as well. The applicability of the principle of forum prorogatum in arbitral jurisdictions can be inferred from general principles of law. Nonetheless, its practicality often depends on the choices of national legislators. Consequently, forum prorogatum undoubtedly functions if the legal system in which the arbitration is being held impedes the objection of the award for reasons related to the arbitration agreement which were not contested during the course of the arbitration. On the contrary, doubts arise in the case in which that preclusive mechanism is not provided for. Nevertheless, in the Author's opinion, the principle of forum prorogatum finds application regardless of the system of preclusions, since its applicability is owed to reasons of a logicaldogmatic nature. The only limit to its practicality may be the provision of an express legal prohibition. The Author also focuses on the change introduced in Italy by the 2006 reform with the combined provision of law of articles 817, 3º co. and 819, 1º co., num. 1), c.p.c.Articles published in or submitted to a Journal without I

La class action italiana è ormai prossima ai nastri di partenza

Articles published in or submitted to a Journal without IF refereed / of international relevanc

La qualificazione dell’eccezione di compromesso per arbitrato estero quale eccezione di merito: problematiche connesse di diritto interno e di diritto internazionale

Nota a ordinanza Cassazione sezioni unite civile 18 aprile 2003, n. 6349.Nota a ordinanza Cassazione sezioni unite civile 18 aprile 2003, n. 6349.Articles published in or submitted to a Journal without I

Note sul giusto procedimento davanti alla Corte d’appello (a proposito del giudizio di nullità del lodo)

Nota a Cassazione sezione I civile 19 settembre 2003 n. 13894.Nota a Cassazione sezione I civile 19 settembre 2003 n. 13894.Articles published in or submitted to a Journal without I

Arbitrato Estero

Monograph's chapter

Genistein supplementation and cardiac function in postmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome: Results from a pilot strain-echo study

Genistein, a soy-derived isoflavone,may improve cardiovascular risk profile in postmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome (MetS), but few literature data on its cardiac effects in humans are available. The aim of this sub-study of a randomized double-blind case-control study was to analyze the effect on cardiac function of one-year genistein dietary supplementation in 22 post-menopausal patients with MetS. Participants received 54 mg/day of genistein (n = 11) or placebo (n = 11) in combination with a Mediterranean-style diet and regular exercise. Left ventricular (LV) systolic function was assessed as the primary endpoint, according to conventional and strain-echocardiography measurements. Also, left atrial (LA) morphofunctional indices were investigated at baseline and at the final visit. Results were expressed as median with interquartile range (IQ). A significant improvement of LV ejection fraction (20.3 (IQ 12.5) vs. -1.67 (IQ 24.8); p = 0.040)), and LA area fractional change (11.1 (IQ 22.6) vs. 2.8 (9.5); p = 0.034)) were observed in genistein patients compared to the controls, following 12 months of treatment. In addition, body surface area indexed LA systolic volume and peak LA longitudinal strain significantly changed from basal to the end of the study in genistein-treated patients. One-year supplementation with 54 mg/day of pure genistein improved both LV ejection fraction and LA remodeling and function in postmenopausal women with MetS

Spesso la storia si ripete e a volte gli orientamenti si consolidano: due questioni in tema di enforcement di lodi arbitrali secondo la Convenzione di New York del 1958

Nota a District Court for the Southern District of New York 14 maggio 2003 (USA).Nota a District Court for the Southern District of New York 14 maggio 2003 (USA).Articles published in or submitted to a Journal without I

La <<jurisdiction>> del giudice statale nei procedimenti di <<enforcement>> dei lodi arbitrali stranieri disciplinati dalla Convenzione di New York del 1958

Inquadramento del tema. La jurisdiction del giudice nazionale nell'ordinamento statunitense in relazione ai giudizi di cognizione ordinaria; in relazione ai procedimenti di esecuzione delle sentenze giudiziarie straniere e dei lodi arbitrali stranieri. La Convenzione di New York sul riconoscimento e l'esecuzione dei lodi esteri e la questione della jurisdiction del giudice statale: interpretazione sistematica e teleologica del diritto pattizio alla luce delle normative statali di attuazione del trattato e della giurisprudenza con particolare riferimento alla immunità dalla giurisdizione delle corti statunitensi. La Convenzione di New York quale fonte di jurisdiction nei procedimenti di enforcement dei lodi arbitrali stranieri. Alcune questioni residuali in tema di giusto processo, presenza dei beni del convenuto nel foro del giudice dell'enforcement e onere probatorio.Inquadramento del tema. La jurisdiction del giudice nazionale nell'ordinamento statunitense in relazione ai giudizi di cognizione ordinaria; in relazione ai procedimenti di esecuzione delle sentenze giudiziarie straniere e dei lodi arbitrali stranieri. La Convenzione di New York sul riconoscimento e l'esecuzione dei lodi esteri e la questione della jurisdiction del giudice statale: interpretazione sistematica e teleologica del diritto pattizio alla luce delle normative statali di attuazione del trattato e della giurisprudenza con particolare riferimento alla immunità dalla giurisdizione delle corti statunitensi. La Convenzione di New York quale fonte di jurisdiction nei procedimenti di enforcement dei lodi arbitrali stranieri. Alcune questioni residuali in tema di giusto processo, presenza dei beni del convenuto nel foro del giudice dell'enforcement e onere probatorio.Articles published in or submitted to a Journal without I

Esecuzione delle sentenze della Corte EDU e riapertura del processo: la giurisprudenza italiana non colma la lacuna normativa e garantisce l’impunità del condannato

Articles published in or submitted to a Journal without IF refereed / of international relevanc