11 research outputs found

    The Impact of Hypertension on Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Get PDF
    Arterial chronic hypertension (HTN) is a well-known cardiovascular risk factor for development of atherosclerosis. In order to explain the relation between HTN and acute coronary syndromes the following factors should be considered: (1) risk factors are shared by the diseases, such as genetic risk, insulin resistance, sympathetic hyperactivity, and vasoactive substances (i.e., angiotensin II); (2) hypertension is associated with the development of atherosclerosis (which in turn contributes to progression of myocardial infarction). From all the registries and the data available up to now, hypertensive patients with ACS are more likely to be older, female, of nonwhite ethnicity, and having a higher prevalence of comorbidities. Data on the prognostic role of a preexisting hypertensive state in ACS patients are so far contrasting. The aim of the present paper is to focus on hypertensive patients with ACS, in order to better elucidate whether these patients are at higher risk and deserve a tailored approach for management and followup

    Mechanical ventilation in the early phase of ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with mechanical revascularization

    Get PDF
    Background: So far, few data have been available on the incidence and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). The aim of the study was to assess the clinical and prognostic impact of MV at short and long term in 106 patients with ST elevation MI (STEMI) requiring mechanical ventilation.Results: The incidence of mechanical ventilation was 7.6%. Reasons for intubation were as follows: cardiogenic shock in 64 (60.4%) patients, ventricular fibrillation in 32 (30.1%) patients and acute pulmonary edema in 10 (9.5%) patients. Patients submitted to MV were older (p = 0.016), more frequently had a previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI;p = 0.014) and a previous MI (p = 0.001). A higher in-Intensive Cardiac Care Unit death was observed in MV patients (44.3% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001), as well as a higher mortality at follow-up (36.7% vs. 14.8%, p < 0.001). MV was associated with higher mortality rates both at short and long term.Conclusions: In a large series of consecutive STEMI patients submitted to MV, the need of MV is a strong prognostic indicator of mortality both at short and long term. Among mechanically ventilated STEMI patients infarct size (as inferred by TnI values) and PCI failure were independent predictors of early death, while the duration of MV was related to death at longterm

    Autoantibodies against β1-Adrenergic Receptors: Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Renal Function

    No full text
    BackgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) nonresponse remains a major clinical problem. Autoantibodies specific for the 1-adrenergic (1-AAbs) and muscarinic (M2-AAbs) receptors are found in patients with chronic heart failure (HF) of various etiologies.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 73 HF patients (median age 67 years, 84% males, New York Heart Association II-IV, in sinus rhythm, left ventricular ejection fraction <35%) who received CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) from 2010 to 2013. 1-AAbs and M2-AAbs were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Echocardiography was used to assess CRT response (reduction >15% in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months follow-up). Renal function (RF) parameters (creatinine [Cr], blood urea nitrogen [BUN], estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR Modified Diet in Renal Disease], cystatin C [Cys-C], and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL]) were also evaluated.ResultsA significantly higher percentage of patients positive for 1-AAbs (OD sample/OD reference ratio >2.1) in nonresponders than in responder patients was observed (57% vs 27%, P = 0.004). No influence of M2-AAbs on CRT-D response was demonstrated. 1-AAbs were predictive of a poor CRT-D response (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] 3.64 [1.49-8.88], P = 0.005), also after adjustment for RF parameters (OR [95% CI] 4.95 [1.51-16.26], P = 0.008) observed to influence CRT-D response (Cr P = 0.03, BUN P = 0.009, Cys-C P = 0.02). The positive rates of 1-AABs in patients with abnormal blood level of Cr, eGFR, Cys-C, and NGAL were significantly higher than those with normal levels (P = 0.03, P = 0.02, P = 0.001, P = 0.007, respectively).ConclusionsOur study suggests that (1) the evaluation of 1-AAb is useful to identify responders to CRT-D; (2) the presence of 1-AAbs is in relationship with elevated renal function parameters

    Echocardiographic and biohumoral characteristics in patients with AL and TTR amyloidosis at diagnosis

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Few studies have analyzed the clinical and echocardiographic differences between light-chain (AL) and transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the present research was to compare, in a real-world setting, the clinical and echocardiographic profiles of these kinds of amyloidosis, at the time of diagnosis, using new-generation echocardiography. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with AL and 48 patients with TTR amyloidosis were studied. RESULTS: According to the criterion of mean left ventricular (LV) thickness >12 mm, 45 AL (C-AL) and all TTR patients had cardiac amyloidotic involvement, whereas 34 AL patients did not. TTR patients had increased right ventricular (RV) and LV chambers with increased RV and LV wall thickness and reduced LV ejection fraction and fractional shortening. Furthermore, TTR patients showed lower N-terminal pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide concentrations and New York Heart Association functional class when compared with C-AL. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that at time of first diagnosis, TTR patients have a more advanced amyloidotic involvement of the heart, despite less severe symptoms and biohumoral signs of heart failure. We can hypothesize that we observed different diseases at different stages. In fact, AL amyloidosis is a multiorgan disease with quick progression rate, that becomes rapidly symptomatic, whereas TTR amyloidosis might have a slow progression rate and might remain poorly symptomatic for a greater amount of time
    corecore