Study the Influence of Treatment Interruptions in the Radical Irradiation of Breast Cancer

Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in breast cancer treatment regimen (40 Grey /15 fractions/3 weeks) is more convenient for patients, especially those coming from remote areas to radiotherapy facilities and for healthcare providers, than conventional fractionation (50 Gy/25 fractions/5weeks). So the effect of radiotherapy interruption on treatment outcome (loco-regional control (LRC)& overall survival (OS)) during hypofractionated schedule is the issue of our study. Materials and Methods: We studied retrospectively 174 female patients with breast cancer who received PORT at the Clinical Oncology & Nuclear Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt, from January-2012 to December-2016. We determined the treatment outcome (OS&LRC) from the follow-up (FU) of the studied patients, as the patient still survived or died, and recurrence till now occurred or not, and were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method and Logrank test, respectively. Then we calculated surviving fraction (SF) and tumor control probability (TCP) with regard to biologically effective dose (BED), for all patients, using breast cancer radiobiological parameters. Results: When comparing patients without radiotherapy gap with patients with radiotherapy gaps, the results showed a decrease in LRC rate in patients with radiotherapy treatment interruptions by 15 % (P=0.019, a significant value), but no detrimental effect on OS because of the very limited number of the studied patients. Curves of the relationship between (SF&OTT) and (TCP&OTT) confirmed the detrimental effect of unscheduled gap during radiotherapy fractions on the treatment outcome. Also we found a significant-P value for (marital status, start day of radiotherapy fractions, time, number, and duration of gaps); it means these factors affect LRC during radiotherapy interruptions.Conclusions: Interruptions during postoperative hypofractionated irradiation of 7breast cancer (40 Gy/15 fractions/3weeks) should be avoided and if they are inevitable, they should not be prolonged more than two days, as they will adversely affect the treatment outcome (LRC)

Dose verification of intensity modulated radiotherapy in head and neck tumors

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement between measured and calculated doses for head and neck tumors using different gamma criteria and to establish quality assurance protocol for the delivery of IMRT in The National Cancer Institute in Cairo. Methods: The dose is calculated for 30 patients using CMS Treatment Planning System. The ionization chamber (0.6 cm3 Farmer type) is used for point dose measurements. The 2D-array (PTW 729) and GafChromic films (EBT2) are used for 2D graphical dose distribution. Four different gamma criteria of dose difference (DD) and distance to agreement (DTA) (3%/3 mm, 3%/5 mm, 4%/4 mm and 5%/5 mm DD / DTA) are selected. These criteria are evaluated while suppressing the dose of 10%, 20% or 30% from dose distribution. Results: Point dose evaluations using the ion chamber ranged from -2.6% to 3.7% (mean and standard deviation of 0.46 ± 1.7). Significant differences are observed between the films and 2D-array for all criteria except the 3%/5 mm criteria (96.89 ± 2.2% vs. 94.81 ± 4.2% (p < 0.01)). Conclusion: Differences may exceed about 3% when the ionization chamber is present in steep dose gradient regions. The present results suggest the gamma criteria of 3%/5 mm as the most suitable criteria for IMRT quality assurance. This gamma criterion of 3%/5 mm favorably exceeds 95% in case of maximum dose while suppressing the dose of 20%.The use of 2D-array can reduce the IMRT QA workload.------------------------------Cite this article as: Elawady RA, Attalla EM, Elshemey WM, Shouman T, Alsayed AA. Dose verification of intensity modulated radiotherapy in head and neck tumors. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(3):02037. DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0203.

Dose verification of intensity modulated radiotherapy in head and neck tumors

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement between measured and calculated doses for head and neck tumors using different gamma criteria and to establish quality assurance protocol for the delivery of IMRT in The National Cancer Institute in Cairo. Methods: The dose is calculated for 30 patients using CMS Treatment Planning System. The ionization chamber (0.6 cm3 Farmer type) is used for point dose measurements. The 2D-array (PTW 729) and GafChromic films (EBT2) are used for 2D graphical dose distribution. Four different gamma criteria of dose difference (DD) and distance to agreement (DTA) (3%/3 mm, 3%/5 mm, 4%/4 mm and 5%/5 mm DD / DTA) are selected. These criteria are evaluated while suppressing the dose of 10%, 20% or 30% from dose distribution. Results: Point dose evaluations using the ion chamber ranged from -2.6% to 3.7% (mean and standard deviation of 0.46 ± 1.7). Significant differences are observed between the films and 2D-array for all criteria except the 3%/5 mm criteria (96.89 ± 2.2% vs. 94.81 ± 4.2% (p &lt; 0.01)). Conclusion: Differences may exceed about 3% when the ionization chamber is present in steep dose gradient regions. The present results suggest the gamma criteria of 3%/5 mm as the most suitable criteria for IMRT quality assurance. This gamma criterion of 3%/5 mm favorably exceeds 95% in case of maximum dose while suppressing the dose of 20%.The use of 2D-array can reduce the IMRT QA workload.------------------------------Cite this article as: Elawady RA, Attalla EM, Elshemey WM, Shouman T, Alsayed AA. Dose verification of intensity modulated radiotherapy in head and neck tumors. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(3):02037. DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0203.7</p

Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography: Commissioning and evaluation of patient dose

The improvement in conformal radiotherapy techniques enables us to achieve steep dose gradients around the target which allows the delivery of higher doses to a tumor volume while maintaining the sparing of surrounding normal tissue. One of the reasons for this improvement was the implementation of intensity-modulated radio therapy (IMRT) by using linear accelerators fitted with multi-leaf collimator (MLC), Tomo therapy and Rapid arc. In this situation, verification of patient set-up and evaluation of internal organ motion just prior to radiation delivery become important. To this end, several volumetric image-guided techniques have been developed for patient localization, such as Siemens OPTIVUE/MVCB and MVision megavoltage cone beam CT (MV-CBCT) system. Quality assurance for MV-CBCT is important to insure that the performance of the Electronic portal image device (EPID) and MV-CBCT is suitable for the required treatment accuracy. In this work, the commissioning and clinical implementation of the OPTIVUE/MVCB system was presented. The geometry and gain calibration procedures for the system were described. The image quality characteristics of the OPTIVUE/MVCB system were measured and assessed qualitatively and quantitatively, including the image noise and uniformity, low-contrast resolution, and spatial resolution. The image reconstruction and registration software were evaluated. Dose at isocenter from CBCT and the EPID were evaluated using ionization chamber and thermo-luminescent dosimeters; then compared with that calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS- XiO 4.4). The results showed that there are no offsets greater than 1 mm in the flat panel alignment in the lateral and longitudinal direction over 18 months of the study. The image quality tests showed that the image noise and uniformity were within the acceptable range, and that a 2 cm large object with 1% electron density contrast can be detected with the OPTIVUE/MVCB system with 5 monitor units (MU) protocol. The registration software was accurate within 2 mm in the anterior-posterior, left-right, and superior-inferior directions. The additional dose to the patient from MV-CBCT study set with 5 MU at the isocenter of the treatment plan was 5 cGy. For Electronic portal image device (EPID) verification using two orthogonal images with 2 MU per image the additional dose to the patient was 3.8 cGy. These measured dose values were matched with that calculated by the TPS-XiO, where the calculated doses were 5.2 cGy and 3.9 cGy for MVCT and EPID respectively

Pancreatic surgery outcomes: multicentre prospective snapshot study in 67 countries

Background: Pancreatic surgery remains associated with high morbidity rates. Although postoperative mortality appears to have improved with specialization, the outcomes reported in the literature reflect the activity of highly specialized centres. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following pancreatic surgery worldwide.Methods: This was an international, prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional snapshot study of consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic operations worldwide in a 3-month interval in 2021. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality within 90 days of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore relationships with Human Development Index (HDI) and other parameters.Results: A total of 4223 patients from 67 countries were analysed. A complication of any severity was detected in 68.7 percent of patients (2901 of 4223). Major complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade at least IIIa) were 24, 18, and 27 percent, and mortality rates were 10, 5, and 5 per cent in low-to-middle-, high-, and very high-HDI countries respectively. The 90-day postoperative mortality rate was 5.4 per cent (229 of 4223) overall, but was significantly higher in the low-to-middle-HDI group (adjusted OR 2.88, 95 per cent c.i. 1.80 to 4.48). The overall failure-to-rescue rate was 21 percent; however, it was 41 per cent in low-to-middle-compared with 19 per cent in very high-HDI countries.Conclusion: Excess mortality in low-to-middle-HDI countries could be attributable to failure to rescue of patients from severe complications. The authors call for a collaborative response from international and regional associations of pancreatic surgeons to address management related to death from postoperative complications to tackle the global disparities in the outcomes of pancreatic surgery (NCT04652271; ISRCTN95140761)