24 research outputs found

    L’utilisation d’outils fondĂ©s sur les donnĂ©es probantes et la littĂ©rature en Ă©ducation mĂ©dicale par les directeurs de programmes postdoctoraux au Canada dans l’enseignement et l’évaluation des rĂŽles CanMEDS

    Get PDF
    Background: Researchers have shown that clinical educators feel insufficiently informed about how to teach and assess the CanMEDS roles. Thus, our objective was to examine the extent to which program directors utilize evidence-based tools and the medical education literature in teaching and assessing the CanMEDS roles. Methods: In 2016, the authors utilized an online questionnaire to survey 747 Canadian residency program directors (PD’s) of Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) accredited programs. Results: Overall, 186 PD’s participated (24.9%). 36.6% did not know whether the teaching strategies they used were evidence-based and another third (31.9%) believed they were “not at all” or “to a small extent” evidence-based. Similarly, 31.8% did not know whether the assessment tools they used were evidence-based and another third (39.7%) believed they were “not at all” or “to a small extent” evidence-based. PD’s were aware of research on teaching strategies (62.4%) and assessment tools (51.9%), but felt they did not have sufficient time to review relevant literature (72.1% for teaching and 64.1% for assessment). Conclusions: Canadian PD’s reported low awareness of evidence-based tools for teaching and assessment, implying a potential knowledge translation gap in medical education research.Contexte : La recherche montre que les Ă©ducateurs en mĂ©decine se sentent insuffisamment informĂ©s sur la façon d’enseigner et d’évaluer les rĂŽles CanMEDS. Notre objectif Ă©tait donc d’examiner dans quelle mesure les directeurs de programmes utilisent des outils fondĂ©s sur les donnĂ©es probantes et la littĂ©rature en Ă©ducation mĂ©dicale pour enseigner et Ă©valuer les rĂŽles CanMEDS. MĂ©thodes : En 2016, les auteurs ont utilisĂ© un questionnaire en ligne pour interroger 747 directeurs de programmes de rĂ©sidence (DP) agrĂ©Ă©s par le CollĂšge royal des mĂ©decins et chirurgiens du Canada (CRMCC). RĂ©sultats : Parmi les 186 (24,9 %) DP qui ont participĂ© au sondage, 36,6 % ne savaient pas si les stratĂ©gies d’enseignement qu’ils utilisaient Ă©taient fondĂ©es sur des donnĂ©es probantes et un tiers (31,9 %) estimaient qu’elles n’étaient « pas du tout Â» fondĂ©es sur des donnĂ©es probantes ou qu’elles ne l’étaient que « dans une faible mesure Â». De surcroĂźt, 31,8 % ne savaient pas si les outils d’évaluation qu’ils utilisaient Ă©taient fondĂ©s sur des donnĂ©es probantes et un tiers (39,7 %) estimait qu’ils l’étaient « dans une faible mesure Â» ou qu’ils ne l’étaient « pas du tout Â». Les DP ont dĂ©clarĂ© qu’ils Ă©taient au courant de l’existence d’études sur les stratĂ©gies d’enseignement (62,4 %) et sur les outils d’évaluation (51,9 %), mais qu’ils manquaient de temps pour se familiariser avec la documentation pertinente (72,1 % pour l’enseignement et 64,1 % pour l’évaluation). Conclusions : Les DP au Canada sont peu familiers avec les outils d’enseignement et d’évaluation fondĂ©s sur les donnĂ©es probantes, ce qui suggĂšre un transfert des connaissances lacunaire de la recherche Ă  l’éducation mĂ©dicale. &nbsp

    Incorporating CanMEDS and subspecialty training into paediatric residency programs: Why are we still deficient?

    Get PDF
    The Royal College of Physician and Surgeons of Canada mandates that paediatric training programs in Canada incorporate subspecialty training and the teaching and evaluation of the seven CanMEDS roles into their curriculum. The literature suggests that newly practicing paediatricians feel inadequately prepared in many subspecialties and CanMEDS roles

    Canadian paediatric neurology workforce survey and consensus statement

    Get PDF
    Background: Little knowledge exists on the availability of academic and community paediatric neurology positions. This knowledge is crucial for making workforce decisions. Our study aimed to: 1) obtain information regarding the availability of positions for paediatric neurologists in academic centres; 2) survey paediatric neurology trainees regarding their perceptions of employment issues and career plans; 3) survey practicing community paediatric neurologists 4) convene a group of paediatric neurologists to develop consensus regarding how to address these workforce issues. Methods: Surveys addressing workforce issues regarding paediatric neurology in Canada were sent to: 1) all paediatric neurology program directors in Canada (n=9) who then solicited information from division heads and from paediatric neurologists in surrounding areas; 2) paediatric neurology trainees in Canada (n=57) and; 3) community paediatric neurologists (n=27). A meeting was held with relevant stakeholders to develop a consensus on how to approach employment issues. Results: The response rate was 100% from program directors, 57.9% from residents and 44% from community paediatric neurologists. We found that the number of projected positions in academic paediatric neurology is fewer than the number of paediatric neurologists that are being trained over the next five to ten years, despite a clinical need for paediatric neurologists. Paediatric neurology residents are concerned about job availability and desire more career counselling. Conclusions: There is a current and projected clinical demand for paediatric neurologists despite a lack of academic positions. Training programs should focus on community neurology as a viable career option

    Deep phenotyping of the neuroimaging and skeletal features in KBG syndrome: a study of 53 patients and review of the literature

    Full text link
    Background: KBG syndrome is caused by haploinsufficiency of ANKRD11and is characterised by macrodontia of upper central incisors, distinctive facial features, short stature, skeletal anomalies, developmental delay, brain malformations and seizures. The central nervous system (CNS) and skeletal features remain poorly defined. Methods: CNS and/or skeletal imaging were collected from molecularly confirmed individuals with KBG syndrome through an international network. We evaluated the original imaging and compared our results with data in the literature. Results: We identified 53 individuals, 44 with CNS and 40 with skeletal imaging. Common CNS findings included incomplete hippocampal inversion and posterior fossa malformations; these were significantly more common than previously reported (63.4% and 65.9% vs 1.1% and 24.7%, respectively). Additional features included patulous internal auditory canal, never described before in KBG syndrome, and the recurrence of ventriculomegaly, encephalic cysts, empty sella and low-lying conus medullaris. We found no correlation between these structural anomalies and epilepsy or intellectual disability. Prevalent skeletal findings comprised abnormalities of the spine including scoliosis, coccygeal anomalies and cervical ribs. Hand X-rays revealed frequent abnormalities of carpal bone morphology and maturation, including a greater delay in ossification compared with metacarpal/phalanx bones. Conclusion: This cohort enabled us to describe the prevalence of very heterogeneous neuroradiological and skeletal anomalies in KBG syndrome. Knowledge of the spectrum of such anomalies will aid diagnostic accuracy, improve patient care and provide a reference for future research on the effects ofANKRD11variants in skeletal and brain development

    The h-index in medical education: an analysis of medical education journal editorial boards

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background: Disciplines differ in their authorship and citation practices, thus discipline-specific h-index norms are desirable. Thus the goal of this study was to examine the relationship between the h-index and academic rank in the field of medical education, and the differences in the h-index between MD’s and PhD’s in this field. Methods: Due to the absence of a formalized registry of medical educators, we sampled available editorial board membership (considered a proxy for identifying ‘career’ medical educators) to establish h-index values. These were determined using Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar (GS), and internet searching was used to determine their academic rank. The correlation between authors’ h-indices derived from WoS and GS was also determined. Results: 130 editors were identified (95 full professors, 21 associate professors, 14 assistant professors). A significant difference was noted between the h-indices of full professors and associate/assistant professors (p < .001). Median h-indices equaled 14 for full professors (Interquartile range [IQR] =11); 7 for associate professors (IQR =7) and 6.5 for assistant professors (IQR = 8). h-indices of MD’s and PhD’s did not differ significantly. Moderate correlation between GS and WOS h-indices was noted R = 0.46, p < .001. Conclusions: The results provide some guidance as to the expected h-indices of a select group of medical educators. No differences appear to exist between assistant professor and associate professor ranks or between MD’s and PhD’s
    corecore