Edge-transitivity of Cayley graphs generated by transpositions

Let $S$ be a set of transpositions generating the symmetric group $S_n$. The transposition graph of $S$ is defined to be the graph with vertex set $\{1,\ldots,n\}$, and with vertices $i$ and $j$ being adjacent in $T(S)$ whenever $(i,j) \in S$. In the present note, it is proved that two transposition graphs are isomorphic if and only if the corresponding two Cayley graphs are isomorphic. It is also proved that the transposition graph $T(S)$ is edge-transitive if and only if the Cayley graph $Cay(S_n,S)$ is edge-transitive

Diameter of Cayley graphs of permutation groups generated by transposition trees

Let $\Gamma$ be a Cayley graph of the permutation group generated by a transposition tree $T$ on $n$ vertices. In an oft-cited paper \cite{Akers:Krishnamurthy:1989} (see also \cite{Hahn:Sabidussi:1997}), it is shown that the diameter of the Cayley graph $\Gamma$ is bounded as \diam(\Gamma) \le \max_{\pi \in S_n}{c(\pi)-n+\sum_{i=1}^n \dist_T(i,\pi(i))}, where the maximization is over all permutations $\pi$, $c(\pi)$ denotes the number of cycles in $\pi$, and \dist_T is the distance function in $T$. In this work, we first assess the performance (the sharpness and strictness) of this upper bound. We show that the upper bound is sharp for all trees of maximum diameter and also for all trees of minimum diameter, and we exhibit some families of trees for which the bound is strict. We then show that for every $n$, there exists a tree on $n$ vertices, such that the difference between the upper bound and the true diameter value is at least $n-4$. Observe that evaluating this upper bound requires on the order of $n!$ (times a polynomial) computations. We provide an algorithm that obtains an estimate of the diameter, but which requires only on the order of (polynomial in) $n$ computations; furthermore, the value obtained by our algorithm is less than or equal to the previously known diameter upper bound. This result is possible because our algorithm works directly with the transposition tree on $n$ vertices and does not require examining any of the permutations (only the proof requires examining the permutations). For all families of trees examined so far, the value $\beta$ computed by our algorithm happens to also be an upper bound on the diameter, i.e. \diam(\Gamma) \le \beta \le \max_{\pi \in S_n}{c(\pi)-n+\sum_{i=1}^n \dist_T(i,\pi(i))}.Comment: This is an extension of arXiv:1106.535