5 research outputs found

    Do Mice Think in Italian?

    Full text link
    ‘Do mice think in Italian?’ is a group of films, drawings, drawn wallpaper and performances exploring language, uncertainty and humour. They were made at the British School, Rome. The visual sources for this work were found in a wide range of artefacts; frescoes, archaeological objects, sculptures and monuments in and close to Rome. Specifically, the project attempted to reconcile and transform a soft brand of analytical philosophy which asks what is the nature of consciousness, can it be described objectively, how is meaning formed, how does language work exemplified by W.V.O. Quine in ‘Word and Object’ 1960 and T Nagel in ‘What’s it like to be a bat?’ 1974. On another level it reflected upon the language and conventions of academic learning and research. For the performances a quasi-academic lecturer gave a digressive talk on moth behaviour, assisted by caterpillars. In the films and drawings, characters, usually animals, often in clothes and speaking or behaving like human beings used simple language to reveal inadvertent psychological states (expectations, hopes and ideas.) and so implicate the viewer in fantastical scenarios. Absurdity and skewed anthropomorphism are used to reveal the manifold ways language is used and how intentions rarely match reality. The locations; parks, gardens and museums (mostly in Rome), the British School and unrecognisable interiors were chosen to build up a context which generated a further raft of abstract qualities: inappropriateness, unplannedness, transience and incompleteness. The work was profiled by Sarah Kent in Time Out

    Video Works

    Full text link
    Five films: 'Fly', 'Beautiful Pot', 'Beetle', 'Caterpillar' and 'Boxer' (2001-2003) were compiled for cinematic screening with seven others: 'Billy Bear', 'Barbary Goats', 'Cynthia', 'Earthquake', 'Hello', 'Sheep' (1996-2001). The latter films were re-edited, remastered and digitally restored from VHS tapes. All were made for display on individual monitors, and explore the use of a fixed frame, highlighting the curious ‘performative’ nature of everyday speech and encounters. The protagonists are obviously fantastical – puppets or humans dressed as animals. However, they are made, to draw the viewer into their world. In this pared-down situation, outside a human, social or historical context, they can explore language, philosophy and behaviour on a fantastical but nonetheless simple level. Made as individual vignettes or portraits, they look at how we use and are framed by language, objects and other people. In these films I aimed to portray the melancholy and humour in human interaction: how expectation exceeds actuality; how things don’t quite work and how people compensate for this. ‘Edwina Ashton Video works’ were film projections on cinematic screen. In this 45 minute compilation different speeds, activities, types of sound and emotional states were ordered and rearranged to build up a complex pattern of character and situation. These films explicitly looked to, explored and experimented with models of anthropomorphism used by Beatrix Potter, Fischli and Weiss and William Wegman

    The Salon of Becoming-Animal

    No full text
    corecore