Programmed electrical stimulation for risk stratification of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

Background: Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) are at an increased risk for sudden death. Although earlier trials used programmed electrical stimulation (PES) for risk stratification, more recent data demonstrate the benefit of implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) in selected patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) without performing PES. However, little is known about the outcome of non-inducible patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of PES for mortality risk stratification in patients with ICM. Methods: All consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria (history of coronary artery disease, LVEF≤35%, and absence of documented spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia or aborted sudden cardiac death) were included in the study. The stimulation protocol involved up to three extrastimuli from two different sites in the right ventricle, with 180 ms as the shortest coupling interval. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: A total of 198 patients were included in the study; of these, 60 exhibited negative (−)PES, and 138 had positive (+)PES and also underwent ICD implantation. The mean follow-up duration was 4.5 years. There was no difference in age or LVEF between the patient groups. We found a trend towards an increased 5-year survival rate in the (+)PES group in whom ICD implantation had been performed (p=0.058). Survival was significantly better in patients under 68 year olds in the (+)PES group in whom ICD implantation was performed (hazard ratio=0.3, p=0.01). The survival rate of patients ≥68 years old was similar in both groups (p=0.95). Conclusions: Non-inducibility during PES does not predict the prognosis of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmias Utilizing Concealed Nodoventricular or His-Ventricular Pathways: A Structured Approach to Diagnosis and Management

This study sought to describe the electrophysiologic characteristics, diagnostic maneuvers, and treatment of a series of arrhythmias using concealed nodoventricular (cNV) or His-ventricular (cHV) pathways. Confirming the presence and participation of cNV or cHV pathways in tachyarrhythmias is challenging. We present 4 cases of tachycardias with a participatory cNV or cHV pathway. The first patient had a narrow complex tachycardia with ventriculoatrial dissociation. Findings of an entrainment pacing from the right ventricle and fused premature ventricular complexes suggested cNV pathway involvement. The second patient had nonsustained narrow complex tachycardia with more ventricular than atrial complexes. The tachycardia exhibited an anterograde His-right bundle (RB) activation sequence and normal His-ventricular (HV) interval and consistently terminated with fused ventricular extra stimuli, suggesting cNV pathway participation. The third patient had a wide complex tachycardia (WCT) with either a right or left bundle branch block pattern. The WCT showed an eccentric His-RB activation sequence and short HV interval and terminated with fused premature ventricular complexes, suggesting a cHV (or concealed fasciculoventricular) pathway involvement. The fourth patient had a WCT with alternating bundle branch block morphologies with a short HV interval. Entrainment from the basal right ventricle demonstrated fusion and a short postpacing interval, suggesting cHV (or fasciculoventricular) pathway involvement. Ablation at the proximal RB rendered the tachycardia noninducible. A structured approach can help diagnose and treat cNV or cHV pathways. We emphasize the importance of evaluating both the His-RB activation pattern and HV interval during sinus rhythm and tachycardia as well as the ventricular pacing study

Magnetic resonance imaging of the left atrial appendage post pulmonary vein isolation: Implications for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion

Background: There is increasing interest in performing left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion at the time of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. However, to date there has been no description of the acute changes to the LAA immediately following pulmonary vein (PV) isolation and additional left atrium (LA) substrate modification. This study assessed changes in the size and tissue characteristics of the LAA ostium in patients undergoing PV isolation. Methods: This series included 8 patients who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of the LA with delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and contrast enhanced 3-D magnetic resonance angiography pre-, within 48 h of, and 3 months post ablation. Two independent cardiac radiologists evaluated the ostial LAA diameters and area at each time point in addition to the presence of gadolinium enhancement. Results: Compared to pre-ablation values, the respective median differences in oblique diameters and LAA area were +1.8 mm, +1.7 mm, and +0.6 cm2 immediately post ablation (all NS) and −2.7 mm, −2.3 mm, and −0.5 cm2 at 3 months (all NS). No delayed enhancement was detected in the LAA post ablation. Conclusion: No significant change to LAA diameter, area, or tissue characteristics was noted after PV isolation. While these findings suggest the safety and feasibility of concomitant PV isolation and LAA device occlusion, the variability in the degree and direction of change of the LAA measurements highlights the need for further study