19 research outputs found
Predictors of Enhancing Human Physical Attractiveness: Data from 93 Countries
People across the world and throughout history have gone to great lengths to enhance their physical appearance. Evolutionary psychologists and ethologists have largely attempted to explain this phenomenon via mating preferences and strategies. Here, we test one of the most popular evolutionary hypotheses for beauty-enhancing behaviors, drawn from mating market and parasite stress perspectives, in a large cross-cultural sample. We also test hypotheses drawn from other influential and non-mutually exclusive theoretical frameworks, from biosocial role theory to a cultural media perspective. Survey data from 93,158 human participants across 93 countries provide evidence that behaviors such as applying makeup or using other cosmetics, hair grooming, clothing style, caring for body hygiene, and exercising or following a specific diet for the specific purpose of improving ones physical attractiveness, are universal. Indeed, 99% of participants reported spending \u3e10 min a day performing beauty-enhancing behaviors. The results largely support evolutionary hypotheses: more time was spent enhancing beauty by women (almost 4 h a day, on average) than by men (3.6 h a day), by the youngest participants (and contrary to predictions, also the oldest), by those with a relatively more severe history of infectious diseases, and by participants currently dating compared to those in established relationships. The strongest predictor of attractiveness-enhancing behaviors was social media usage. Other predictors, in order of effect size, included adhering to traditional gender roles, residing in countries with less gender equality, considering oneself as highly attractive or, conversely, highly unattractive, TV watching time, higher socioeconomic status, right-wing political beliefs, a lower level of education, and personal individualistic attitudes. This study provides novel insight into universal beauty-enhancing behaviors by unifying evolutionary theory with several other complementary perspectives
Recommended from our members
LATERAL EXTENT OF INTERNAL AUDITORY CANAL INVOLVEMENT BY ACOUSTIC NEUROMAS: A SURGICAL-RADIOLOGIC CORRELATION
Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today
As biomolecular approaches for hearing restoration in profound sensorineural hearing loss evolve, they will be applied in conjunction with or instead of cochlear implants. An understanding of the current state-of-the-art of this technology, including its advantages, disadvantages, and its potential for delivering and interacting with biomolecular hearing restoration approaches, is helpful for designing modern hearing-restoration strategies. Cochlear implants (CI) have evolved over the last four decades to restore hearing more effectively, in more people, with diverse indications. This evolution has been driven by advances in technology, surgery, and healthcare delivery. Here, we offer a practical treatise on the state of cochlear implantation directed towards developing the next generation of inner ear therapeutics. We aim to capture and distill conversations ongoing in CI research, development, and clinical management. In this review, we discuss successes and physiological constraints of hearing with an implant, common surgical approaches and electrode arrays, new indications and outcome measures for implantation, and barriers to CI utilization. Additionally, we compare cochlear implantation with biomolecular and pharmacological approaches, consider strategies to combine these approaches, and identify unmet medical needs with cochlear implants. The strengths and weaknesses of modern implantation highlighted here can mark opportunities for continued progress or improvement in the design and delivery of the next generation of inner ear therapeutics
Recommended from our members
Surgical Management of Previously Untreated Glomus Jugulare Tumors
Endoscopic Inside-Out Mastoidectomy with the Ultrasonic Bone Aspirator
We report our experience using the ultrasonic bone aspirator (UBA) for transcanal endoscopic “inside out” mastoidectomy. The UBA has irrigation, suction, and nonrotatory ultrasonic bone-removing technology in 1 handpiece, which makes it appropriate for bone removal during this procedure. The results of our study show that this technique is safe and effective for patients with cholesteatoma in a small sclerotic mastoid. We also discuss the nuances associated with using the UBA during endoscopic ear surgery
Applicability of the Pittsburgh Staging System for Advanced Cutaneous Malignancy of the Temporal Bone
The objectives are to evaluate the applicability of the Pittsburgh staging system (PSS) (designed for primary temporal bone malignancies) to advanced periauricular cutaneous malignancies with temporal bone involvement and to study treatment outcomes and prognostic factors predicting recurrence-free survival. Ten patients with advanced periauricular cutaneous malignancy with temporal bone involvement were identified. Patients with primary temporal bone or parotid gland malignancies were excluded. All patients were clinically T4 at presentation by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Using Pittsburgh staging, six were T1 (stage I) and four were T4 (stage III). The mean follow-up was 13.6 months (3 to 24 months). Patients with basal cell carcinoma were managed with wide local excision and lateral temporal bone resection (WLE/LTBR) without adjuvant therapy. Two of three (66%) are alive and free of disease; one patient died of other causes. Treatment for squamous cell carcinoma patients involved multimodality therapy. Kaplan–Meier survival curves show a worse prognosis in terms of disease-specific survival for patients with higher-staged PSS tumors. This did not reach statistical significance. The PSS may provide additional prognostic information on advanced cutaneous malignancies of the temporal bone over the more widely used AJCC staging system. However, further prospective multicenter studies with larger sample size are required to validate our findings. Basal cell carcinoma was well controlled with WLE/LTBR alone without adjuvant therapy, whereas squamous cell carcinoma required multimodality therapy: WLE/LTBR and postoperative radiation with or without chemotherapy