Quantified duplex augmentation in healthy subjects and patients with venous disease: San Diego population study

AbstractObjective: This study was undertaken to determine the quantitative augmentation response in several veins examined in a cohort assembled to permit comparisons by sex, age, and ethnicity, under normal conditions and in the presence of obstruction, with and without trophic changes. Method: The common femoral vein, superficial femoral vein, sapheno-femoral junction, popliteal vein, sapheno-popliteal junction, and posterior tibial vein were studied with duplex ultrasonographic scanning. Augmentation response was elicited with use of an automated cuff inflator. Mean level of each response was analyzed according to patient sex, age, and ethnicity, each adjusted for the other two. Normal values were compared with those obtained from legs with venous obstructive disease, with or without signs of trophic changes. Results: Decreased augmentation response was noted only in the sapheno-femoral junction and sapheno-popliteal junction, and was smaller in women. Augmentation response was slightly increased in the oldest age group (>70 years) in the common femoral vein, superficial femoral vein, popliteal vein, and posterior tibial vein. The highest augmentation response was found in Asian subjects, in the common and superficial femoral veins and the sapheno-femoral and sapheno-popliteal junctions; and the smallest augmentation response was found in African American subjects, in these same veins and junctions. Differences in vein diameters may explain these findings, ie, smaller diameters in Asians and larger diameters in African Americans. Most important, compared with normal values, augmentation response was decreased in legs with venous obstructive disease only when trophic changes were present. Conclusion: Like quantification of reflux, quantitative evaluation of the augmentation response may help in diagnosis of venous obstructive disease when trophic changes are present. (J Vasc Surg 2003;37:1054-8.

Risk factors for chronic venous disease: The San Diego Population Study

BackgroundThe etiology of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs is unclear, and very limited data are available on potential risk factors from representative population studies.MethodsParticipants in the San Diego Population Study, a free-living adult population randomly selected from age, sex, and ethnic strata, were systematically assessed for risk factors for venous disease. Categorization of normal, moderate, and severe disease was determined hierarchically through clinical examination and ultrasonography imaging by trained vascular technologists, who also performed anthropometric measures. An interviewer administered a questionnaire and an examination assessed potential risk factors for venous disease suggested by previous reports.ResultsIn multivariable models, moderate venous disease was independently related to age, a family history of venous disease, previous hernia surgery, and normotension in both sexes. In men, current walking, the absence of cardiovascular disease, and not moving after sitting were also predictive. Additional predictors in women were weight, number of births, oophorectomy, flat feet, and not sitting. For severe disease, age, family history of venous disease, waist circumference, and flat feet were predictive in both sexes. In men, occupation as a laborer, cigarette smoking, and normotension were also independently associated with severe venous disease. Additional significant and independent predictors in women were hours standing, history of leg injury, number of births, and cardiovascular disease, but African American ethnicity was protective. Multiple other postulated risk factors for venous disease were not significant in multivariable analysis in this population.ConclusionsAlthough some risk factors for venous disease such as age, family history of venous disease, and findings suggestive of ligamentous laxity (hernia surgery, flat feet) are immutable, others can be modified, such as weight, physical activity, and cigarette smoking. Overall, these data provide modest support for the potential of behavioral risk-factor modification to prevent chronic venous disease

Risk factors for progression of peripheral arterial disease in large and small vessels.

ERMAInternational audienceBACKGROUND: Data on the natural history of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are scarce and are focused primarily on clinical symptoms. Using noninvasive tests, we assessed the role of traditional and novel risk factors on PAD progression. We hypothesized that the risk factors for large-vessel PAD (LV-PAD) progression might differ from small-vessel PAD (SV-PAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1990 and 1994, patients seen during the prior 10 years in our vascular laboratories were invited for a new vascular examination. The first assessment provided baseline data, with follow-up data obtained at this study. The highest decile of decline was considered major progression, which was a -0.30 ankle brachial index decrease for LV-PAD and a -0.27 toe brachial index decrease for SV-PAD progression. In addition to traditional risk factors, the roles of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, serum amyloid-A, lipoprotein(a), and homocysteine were assessed. Over the average follow-up interval of 4.6+/-2.5 years, the 403 patients showed a significant ankle brachial index and toe brachial index deterioration. In multivariable analysis, current smoking, ratio of total to HDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were related to LV-PAD progression, whereas only diabetes was associated with SV-PAD progression. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors contribute differentially to the progression of LV-PAD and SV-PAD. Cigarette smoking, lipids, and inflammation contribute to LV-PAD progression, whereas diabetes was the only significant predictor of SV-PAD progression