The Role and Limitations of 18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Scan and Computerized Tomography (CT) in Restaging Patients with Hepatic Colorectal Metastases Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Comparison with Operative and Pathological Findings

BACKGROUND: Recent data confirmed the importance of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the selection of patients with colorectal hepatic metastases for surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before hepatic resection in selected cases may improve outcome. The influence of chemotherapy on the sensitivity of FDG-PET and CT in detecting liver metastases is not known. METHODS: Patients were assigned to either neoadjuvant treatment or immediate hepatic resection according to resectability, risk of recurrence, extrahepatic disease, and patient preference. Two-thirds of them underwent FDG-PET/CT before chemotherapy; all underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and FDG-PET/CT. Those without extensive extrahepatic disease underwent open exploration and resection of all the metastases according to original imaging findings. Operative and pathological findings were compared to imaging results. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (33 lesions) underwent immediate hepatic resection (group 1), and 48 patients (122 lesions) received preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (group 2). Sensitivity of FDG-PET and CT in detecting colorectal (CR) metastases was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (FDG-PET: 93.3 vs 49%, P < 0.0001; CT: 87.5 vs 65.3, P = 0.038). CT had a higher sensitivity than FDG-PET in detecting CR metastases following neoadjuvant therapy (65.3 vs 49%, P < 0.0001). Sensitivity of FDG-PET, but not of CT, was lower in group 2 patients whose chemotherapy included bevacizumab compared to patients who did not receive bevacizumab (39 vs 59%, P = 0.068). CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET/CT sensitivity is lowered by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CT is more sensitive than FDG-PET in detecting CR metastases following neoadjuvant therapy. Surgical decision-making requires information from multiple imaging modalities and pretreatment findings. Baseline FDG-PET and CT before neoadjuvant therapy are mandatory

The Clinical Impact of Camera-Based Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients With Recurrent Colorectal Cancer

Rationale and Objectives: F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) studies have clinical value in suspected recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer cases. Because this modality is not accessible for many patients, a camera-based FDG (CB-FDG) coincidence imaging was suggested as an alternative. Although inferior in resolution to a dedicated PET system, it can make FDG studies available to more patients. We assessed the clinical value of CB-FDG in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Methods: The disease stage and treatment approach in 83 patients were twice determined by an oncologist and a surgeon, first based on the patient&apos;s records and blind to CB-FDG findings and then with the inclusion of FDG results in the decision-making analysis. Results: On a lesion-based analysis, the sensitivity of CB-FDG was 95% and the specificity was 81% compared with 88% and 64%, respectively, for computed tomography. Adding FDG findings led to disease-stage alteration in 47 patients (57%), upstaging in 35 (42%), and downstaging in 12 (15%). FDG localized the tumor sites in 21 of 26 patients (81%) with suspected clinical recurrence and a negative conventional imaging workup. In 8 patients, FDG ruled out viable tumor tissue suggested by other modalities. The oncologist&apos;s suggested treatment approach was altered in 54% of the patients and the surgeon altered the decision on operability in 28%. Conclusion: CB-FDG assessment has clinical value for both staging and selecting treatment in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer and can be considered an alternative to an nonaccessible dedicated PET system