3 research outputs found

    Serendipitous One-Step Synthesis of Cyclopentene Derivatives from 5′-Deoxy-5′-Heteroarylsulfonylnucleosides as Nucleoside-Derived Julia–Kocienski Reagents

    No full text
    A serendipitous one-step transformation of 5′-deoxy-5′-heteroarylsulfonylnucleosides into cyclopentene derivatives is reported. This unique transformation likely proceeds via a domino reaction initiated by α-deprotonation of the heteroaryl sulfone and subsequent elimination reaction to generate a nucleobase and an α,β-unsaturated sulfone that contains a formyl group. The Michael addition of the nucleobase to the α,β-unsaturated sulfone and subsequent intramolecular Julia–Kocienski reaction eventually generate the cyclopentene ring. Heteroarylthio and acylthio groups can be incorporated into the cyclopentene core in place of the nucleobase by conducting this reaction in the presence of a heteroarylthiol and a thiocarboxylic acid, respectively. Cis,cis-trisubstituted cyclopentene derivatives are obtained as a single stereoisomer from ribonucleoside-derived Julia–Kocienski sulfones

    Analytical Performance of a Novel Latex Turbidimetric Immunoassay, “Nanopia TARC”, for TARC/CCL17 Measurement: A Retrospective Observational Study

    No full text
    Thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC, also known as CCL17) is used as a biomarker for atopic dermatitis. The methods currently used for its measurement are complex, time-consuming, and require large machinery, warranting the need for a method that is simple, has a quick turnaround time, and requires less complex machinery. We evaluated the analytical performance of a novel latex turbidimetric immunoassay method, “Nanopia TARC”, on 174 residual serum samples from patients with skin or allergic diseases. This evaluation included the assessment of the limit of blank/detection/quantification (LOB/D/Q), precision, accuracy, linearity, interference, and commutability between Nanopia TARC and “HISCL TARC”, based on the chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) method. The LOB/D/Q values were 13, 57, and 141 pg/mL, respectively. The coefficient of variation of the repeatability was 0.9–3.8%, and that of the intermediate precision was 2.1–5.4%. The total error of the accuracy was 1.9–13.4%. The linearity was 141 and 19,804 pg/mL for TARC. The correlation coefficient between Nanopia TARC and HISCL TARC determined using the Passing–Bablok regression analysis was 0.999. Furthermore, the concordance of diagnostic criteria with AD was 92%. Nanopia TARC was confirmed to have the same analytical performance for TARC measurement as the existing CLEIA method
    corecore