241 research outputs found
Seeing Missile Defense as U.S. Hostility, North Korea Aims at More and Better Weapons
North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs have spurred Japan and South Korea to develop their own
ballistic missile defense (BMD) systems and to regenerate their interest in regional missile defense
cooperation with the United States. Has North Korea reacted to such developments, and if so, how? This
paper looks at North Korea’s missile capacity development as well as its official proclamations and
concludes that while Pyongyang likely does not believe that it is the region’s sole target for U.S. and allied
BMD, it feels deeply threatened by its deployment. Existing and potential BMD systems have not
discouraged Pyongyang from building its own missiles. Rather, North Korea is accelerating its efforts to
improve and expand its missile arsenal to develop a survivable force, likely perceiving BMD systems as
part of an overall U.S. strategy that is hostile to Pyongyang
KEDO: How Multilateral Cooperation Helped an Unprecedented North Korean Project
In 1994, the United States and North Korea signed the Agreed Framework, in which Pyongyang promised to abandon its nuclear program in exchange for energy aid and improvement of relations with Washington. An international consortium led by the United States was created to implement the key provisions of the deal, including the delivery of two light water reactor (LWR) units. While multi-national efforts are common in commercial nuclear projects, the case of the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO) was unique. KEDO’s challenges ranged from the lack of diplomatic relations between its main members and North Korea, to the country’s poor infrastructure. This paper examines KEDO’s experience and concludes that cooperation among its member states—Japan, South Korea, the United States and others—helped ensure the project’s financial and political feasibility, even if work did not proceed smoothly. While the construction of the LWRs was never completed due to larger political changes, KEDO’s experience offers lessons for future nuclear projects that face similar hurdles
The Domestic Politics of Implementation: A Case Study of U.S. Denuclearization Agreements with North Korea
The United States has employed a wide range of foreign policy tools to try to stop North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, including two cooperative agreements that ultimately failed to produce the desired outcome. The breakdown of the 1994 Agreed Framework and the Six Party Talks process in the 2000s has led many to conclude that North Korea’s nuclear weapons program cannot be constrained through cooperation. According to this view, Pyongyang violated its previous commitments once it received economic and political benefits and it will do so again in any future negotiations. The underlying assumption is that Washington was fully implementing its own commitments until Pyongyang broke the deal. Is this true, or did U.S. domestic politics complicate the implementation of the agreements?
This dissertation explores this question through a four-part case study using three analytical lenses: a rational actor model, an institutional interests model, and an individual mindset model. It finds that the United States retreated from full cooperation with North Korea not just because of Pyongyang’s actions, but also due to domestic political considerations. Washington reduced its level of cooperation when tolerance for concessions weakened in the domestic system, sometimes because of institutional interests and sometimes due to political maneuvers by individuals who favored stronger coercive measures and more concessions from North Korea.
The study shows that domestic politics impacts not only the negotiation and ratification of international cooperation agreements, but also their implementation. The findings also suggest it is incorrect to assume that past engagement efforts did not succeed solely due to North Korean actions. Whether a more fully implemented engagement policy would have led to North Korea’s denuclearization is beyond the scope of this study, but it indicates U.S. policy was not applied consistently to North Korea. Any future engagement strategy should aim at a more consistent approach for it to produce the desired results
子どもの報告するほめられたエピソード・ほめられ方の発達的変化 : 小学校入学後3年間の縦断調査による検討
This was longitudinal research to reveal children\u27s reports of praised episodes, way of being praised when they helped others and achievement something, and those developmental changes. The research started when children were first grade and ended in third grade. Every June from July, researcher went to elementary school and interviewed them about episode of being praised and the ways. Children\u27s reports about praised episode were change from first grade to second grade. First graders were reported about helping others, achievement something, and doing something well. Second graders were reported about study, such as taking perfect score. The way of being praised when helping others and achievement situation did not change from first to third grade. When they helped others, they were praised "Thank you". And in achievement situation, they were praised "Great" or "Good job"
Spatial distribution of cryoconite granules and microorganisms on Qaanaaq Glacier, Greenland
第6回極域科学シンポジウム分野横断セッション:[IB2] 地球環境変動の解析と地球生命システム学の構築11月19日(木) 統計数理研究所 セミナー室1(D305
Missile Defense, Extended Deterrence, and Nonproliferation in the 21st Century
The following papers were commissioned as part of the Missile Defense, Extended Deterrence,
and Nonproliferation in the 21st Century project supported by the Project on Advanced Systems
and Concepts for Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (PASCC).
The papers have two general purposes: 1) to create a body of work that provides an overview of
the missile defense developments in major regions of the world; and 2) to provide emerging
scholars the opportunity to conduct research, publish, and connect with each other. We believe
we have succeeded on both counts.
The papers written for this project will be valuable for academics and policymakers alike, and
will be published and disseminated by the Center for International and Security Studies at
Maryland. This element of the project has also been successful in further bringing together a new
cadre of experts in the field and developing the next generation of academics and public servants
who will benefit from their participation in this project.
These papers were completed in the Fall of 2016
- …