Morphological changes in disc herniation in the lower cervical spine: an ultrastructural study

Introduction The basis of disc degeneration is still unknown, but is believed to be a cell-mediated process. Apoptosis might play a major role in degenerative disc disease (DDD). The aim of this study was to correlate the viability of disc cells with the radiological degeneration grades (rDG) in disc herniation. Materials and methods Forty anterior IVD’s (C4–C7) from 39 patients with DDD were studied histologically and ultrastructurally to quantify healthy, “balloon”, chondroptotic, apoptotic and necrotic cells. Patients were classified to their rDG, as having either prolapse (P: DGII + III) and/or osteochondrosis (O: DGIV + V). Similar studies were undertaken on eight control discs. Results Cell death by necrosis (mean 35%) was common but differed not significantly in both groups. All patients with a disc prolapse DGII + III revealed balloon cells (iAF: mean 32%). All appeared alive and sometimes were hypertrophic. However, significantly less balloon cells were found in the O-Group. Control samples revealed no evidence of “balloon” cells in DGII and only a minor rate in DGIII. Conclusion According to the different rDG, quantitative changes were obvious in healthy and “balloon” cells, but not for cell death. At the moment it can only be hypothesized if “balloon” cells are part of a repair strategy and/or cause of disc herniation

Morphological changes in disc herniation in the lower cervical spine: an ultrastructural study

Introduction The basis of disc degeneration is still unknown, but is believed to be a cell-mediated process. Apoptosis might play a major role in degenerative disc disease (DDD). The aim of this study was to correlate the viability of disc cells with the radiological degeneration grades (rDG) in disc herniation. Materials and methods Forty anterior IVD’s (C4–C7) from 39 patients with DDD were studied histologically and ultrastructurally to quantify healthy, “balloon”, chondroptotic, apoptotic and necrotic cells. Patients were classified to their rDG, as having either prolapse (P: DGII + III) and/or osteochondrosis (O: DGIV + V). Similar studies were undertaken on eight control discs. Results Cell death by necrosis (mean 35%) was common but differed not significantly in both groups. All patients with a disc prolapse DGII + III revealed balloon cells (iAF: mean 32%). All appeared alive and sometimes were hypertrophic. However, significantly less balloon cells were found in the O-Group. Control samples revealed no evidence of “balloon” cells in DGII and only a minor rate in DGIII. Conclusion According to the different rDG, quantitative changes were obvious in healthy and “balloon” cells, but not for cell death. At the moment it can only be hypothesized if “balloon” cells are part of a repair strategy and/or cause of disc herniation

Study on accuracy and interobserver reliability of the assessment of odontoid fracture union using plain radiographs or CT scans

In odontoid fracture research, outcome can be evaluated based on validated questionnaires, based on functional outcome in terms of atlantoaxial and total neck rotation, and based on the treatment-related union rate. Data on clinical and functional outcome are still sparse. In contrast, there is abundant information on union rates, although, frequently the rates differ widely. Odontoid union is the most frequently assessed outcome parameter and therefore it is imperative to investigate the interobserver reliability of fusion assessment using radiographs compared to CT scans. Our objective was to identify the diagnostic accuracy of plain radiographs in detecting union and non-union after odontoid fractures and compare this to CT scans as the standard of reference. Complete sets of biplanar plain radiographs and CT scans of 21 patients treated for odontoid fractures were subjected to interobserver assessment of fusion. Image sets were presented to 18 international observers with a mean experience in fusion assessment of 10.7 years. Patients selected had complete radiographic follow-up at a mean of 63.3 ± 53 months. Mean age of the patients at follow-up was 68.2 years. We calculated interobserver agreement of the diagnostic assessment using radiographs compared to using CT scans, as well as the sensitivity and specificity of the radiographic assessment. Agreement on the fusion status using radiographs compared to CT scans ranged between 62 and 90% depending on the observer. Concerning the assessment of non-union and fusion, the mean specificity was 62% and mean sensitivity was 77%. Statistical analysis revealed an agreement of 80–100% in 48% of cases only, between the biplanar radiographs and the reconstructed CT scans. In 50% of patients assessed there was an agreement of less than 80%. The mean sensitivity and specificity values indicate that radiographs are not a reliable measure to indicate odontoid fracture union or non-union. Regarding experience in years of all observers taking part in the study, there were no significant differences for specificity (P = 0.88) or sensitivity (P = 0.26). Further analysis revealed that if a non-union was judged present by an observer then, on average, each observer changed decision regarding the presence of a ‘stable’ or ‘unstable non-union’ in 4.2 of all the 21 cases (range 0–8 changes per observer). We investigated the interobserver reliability of the assessment of fusion in odontoid fractures using biplanar radiographs compared to CT scans. A sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 62% for the radiographs resemble a substantial lack of agreement if different observers evaluate odontoid union. Biplanar radiographs are judged not a reliable measure to detect odontoid fracture union or non-union. The union rates of odontoid fractures have to be revisited and CT scans as the endpoint anchor in outcome studies of treatment related union rates are recommended

PLIF in thoracolumbar trauma: technique and radiological results

Patients with fractures from the 11th thoracic to the 5th lumbar vertebra had a reconstruction of the anterior column with monocortical iliac crest autograft by using a single dorsal approach. The loss of correction was observed using X-rays pre- and post-operatively, at 3 months and after implant removal (IR). Successful fusion was assessed using computed tomography after the implant removal. To assess the loss of correction and intervertebral fusion rate of this technique. There are still controversial discussions about the treatment modalities of spine lesions, especially in cases of burst fractures. Dorsal, combined and ventral procedures are reported with different assets and drawbacks. We want to present a method to restore the weight-bearing capability of the anterior column using a single dorsal approach. From 2001 to 2005, a total of 100 patients was treated with this technique at our department. Follow-up examination was possible in 82 patients. The X-rays and CT scans were proofed for loss of correction and fusion rate. The anterior column has been restored using a monocortical strut graft via a partial resection of the lamina and the apophyseal joint on one side to access the disc space. The dorsal reduction has been achieved using an angular stable pedicle screw system. The mean follow-up time was 15 months (range 8–39); 67 patients had a CT scan at follow-up and 83% showed a 360° fusion. The average post-operative loss of correction was 3.3° (range 0–21). The average duration of operation was 192 min (range 120–360) and the mean blood loss was 790 ml (range 300–3,400 ml). Regarding the complications we did not have any deep wound infections. We had two epidural haematomas postoperatively with a neurological deterioration that had to be revised. We were able to decompress the neurological structures and restore the weight-bearing capability of the anterior column in a one-stage procedure. So we think that this technique can be an alternative procedure to combined operations regarding the presented radiological results of successful fusion and loss of correction

Mid-term results of PLIF/TLIF in trauma

Treatment of thoracolumbar fractures is still controversial. Several treatment options are reported to yield satisfactory results. There is no evidence indicating superiority of any treatment option. We have already presented radiological results of the use of PLIF/TLIF in trauma, which showed satisfactory results concerning intervertebral fusion and acceptable loss of correction. We examined 50 patients regarding loss of correction after implant removal and clinical outcome using a validated visual analogue score. The average time of follow-up (FU) was 35 months. We observed a total loss of correction of 4°. The pre-injury mean VAS score was 92. At FU, there was an average reduction of 17.2 points. Owing to the presented results, we suggest this method as an alternative to combined procedures