14 research outputs found
Re: "Outcomes of stage I/II vulvar cancer patients after negative superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy"
The Role of Chemo-Radiotherapy in the Management of Locally Advanced Carcinoma of the Vulva Single Institutional Experience and Review of Literature
Objective: To retrospectively investigate the outcome and toxicity of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer (LAVC). Patients and Methods: Between 1996 and 2007, 28 consecutive patients with LAVC were treated with chemoradiation (20 primary tumors and 8 loco-regional recurrences). Treatment consists of 2 separate courses of external-beam radiotherapy (40 Gy-2 weeks split-20 Gy). During each course of radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2)/d), was given as a continuous intravenous infusion over the first 4 days, and mitomycin-C (10 mg/m(2) on day 1), as a bolus intravenous injection. Outcome measures were rates of complete and partial response, loco-regional control, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. Results: The median follow-up was 42 months and the median age of patients was 68 years. Twenty patients (72%) achieved complete remission, 4 patients (14%) partial remission, for an overall response rate of 86%. Four patients (14%) had progressive disease directly after chemo-radiotherapy. The actuarial rates of loco-regional control, progression-free survival and overall survival at 4 years were 75%, 71%, and 65%, respectively. There was no treatment break for acute toxicity. Vulvar desquamation was the main acute treatment-related side effect (93%). Three patients developed transient grade 2 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Mild skin fibrosis and atrophy (n = 6, 21%), radiation ulcer (n = 4, 14%, in one patient treatment was needed), telangectasia (n = 3, 11%), and lymphoedema (n = 2, 7%) were the most common late toxicity of chemoradiation. Conclusion: These data support the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy as an effective alternative to primary ultra-radical surgery to treat LAVC with an acceptable toxicity profile
Pregnancy after EMA/CO for gestational trophoblastic disease: a report from the Netherlands
Feaslibility of central co-ordinated EMA/CO for gestational trophoblastic disease in the Netherlands
The impact of performance status on survival in patients of 80 years and older with vulvar cancer
Objective. There are no data available on the impact of performance status on outcome in patients with vulvar cancer. It was the objective of this study to determine the impact of performance status on survival in a group of elderly patients. Methods. A retrospective review of records of patients with vulvar cancer aged 80 years or greater and treated in a gynecological referral center was performed. Multiple clinical and pathological variables together with performance status were assessed and the impact on overall survival was determined both by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results. Of 75 patients aged 80 years or older, 57 (76%) had standard treatment. The patients who had standard treatment were characterized by an earlier clinical stage and a better performance status compared with patients who had nonstandard treatment. When preoperatively available parameters of all patients were assessed in relation to survival in the total group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was the only independent prognostic indicator for survival. When all clinical and histopathological variables were assessed in the subgroup who had standard treatment, both ECOG performance status and extracapsular lymph node involvement were independent prognostic variables for overall survival. Age was not a significant prognostic variable. Conclusions. ECOG performance status is the only available pretreatment variable with independent prognostic value for survival in this group of elderly patients with vulvar cancer. These data show the importance of individualizing the treatment of patients with vulvar cancer. Performance status takes a more important place than age in the management process of these patients. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA