Effects of Forskolin on Kupffer Cell Production of Interleukin-10 and Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Differ from Those of Endogenous Adenylyl Cyclase Activators: Possible Role for Adenylyl Cyclase 9

Proinflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) that are released from Kupffer cells may trigger liver inflammation and damage. Hence, endogenous mechanisms for limiting TNF-α expression are crucial for avoiding the development of sepsis. Such mechanisms include the anti-inflammatory actions of interleukin-10 (IL-10) as well as signaling induced by the intracellular second messenger cyclic AMP (cAMP). Kupffer cells express several receptors that activate cAMP synthesis, including E-prostanoid receptors and β-adrenergic receptors. The expression and role of specific adenylyl cyclases in the inhibition of Kupffer cell activation have so far not been subject to study. Pretreatment of rat Kupffer cell cultures with cAMP analogues [8-(4-chlorophenyl)-thio-cAMP], adenylyl cyclase activator (forskolin), or ligands for G-coupled receptors (isoproterenol or prostaglandin E(2)) 30 min before the addition of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (1 μg/ml) caused attenuated TNF-α levels in culture medium (forskolin/isoproterenol, P ≤ 0.05; prostaglandin E(2), P ≤ 0.01). Forskolin also reduced IL-10 mRNA and protein (P ≤ 0.05), which was not observed with the other cAMP-inducing agents. Furthermore, we found that rat Kupffer cells express high levels of the forskolin-insensitive adenylyl cyclase 9 compared to whole liver and that this expression is down-regulated by LPS (P ≤ 0.05). We conclude that regulation of TNF-α and IL-10 in Kupffer cells depends on the mechanism by which cAMP is elevated. Forskolin and prostaglandin E(2) differ in their effects, which suggests a possible role of forskolin-insensitive adenylyl cyclases like adenylyl cyclase 9

The Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Protein Kinase B Signaling Pathway Is Activated by Lipoteichoic Acid and Plays a Role in Kupffer Cell Production of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10

Sepsis caused by gram-positive bacteria lacking lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has become a major and increasing cause of mortality in intensive-care units. We have recently demonstrated that the gram-positive-specific bacterial cell wall component lipoteichoic acid (LTA) stimulates the release of the proinflammatory cytokines in Kupffer cells in culture. In the present study, we have started to assess the signal transduction events by which LTA induces the production of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in rat Kupffer cells. LTA was found to trigger phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) (p38 MAPK and ERK 1/2) and protein kinase B (PKB). Compared to LPS, LTA was more potent in inducing PKB phosphorylation after 40 min, although we found that the cytokine responses were similar. For both bacterial molecules, blocking phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K; Ly294002) or Janus kinase 2 (JAK-2; AG490) particularly affected the induction of IL-6 and IL-10 release, whereas TNF-α levels were strongly reduced by inhibition of Src family tyrosine kinases (PP2). All three cytokines were reduced by inhibition of p38 MAPK (SB202190) or the broad-range tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein, whereas IL-6 release was particularly blocked by inhibition of ERK 1/2 (PD98059). Divergences in the regulatory pathways controlling TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-6 production in Kupffer cells following LPS or LTA stimulation may create a basis for understanding how the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines is regulated in the liver following infections by gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria

Organ Injury and Cytokine Release Caused by Peptidoglycan Are Dependent on the Structural Integrity of the Glycan Chain

Several studies have implicated a role of peptidoglycan (PepG) as a pathogenicity factor in sepsis and organ injury, in part by initiating the release of inflammatory mediators. We wanted to elucidate the structural requirements of PepG to trigger inflammatory responses and organ injury. Injection of native PepG into anesthetized rats caused moderate but significant increases in the levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, γ-glutamyl transferase, and bilirubin (markers of hepatic injury and/or dysfunction) and creatinine and urea (markers of renal dysfunction) in serum, whereas PepG pretreated with muramidase to digest the glycan backbone failed to do this. In an ex vivo model of human blood, PepG containing different amino acids induced similar levels of the cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and IL-10, as determined by plasma analyses (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Hydrolysis of the Staphylococcus aureus cross-bridge with lysostaphin resulted in moderately reduced release of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10, whereas muramidase digestion nearly abolished the ability to induce cytokine release and IL-6 mRNA accumulation in CD14(+) monocytes compared to intact PepG. However, additional experiments showed that muramidase-treated PepG synergized with lipopolysaccharide to induce TNF-α and IL-10 release in whole blood, despite its lack of inflammatory activity when administered alone. Based on these studies, we hypothesize that the structural integrity of the glycan chain of the PepG molecule is very important for the pathogenic effects of PepG. The amino acid composition of PepG, however, does not seem to be essential for the inflammatory properties of the molecule

Abandon the mouse research ship? Not just yet!

Many preclinical studies in critical care medicine and related disciplines rely on hypothesis-driven research in mice. The underlying premise posits that mice sufficiently emulate numerous pathophysiologic alterations produced by trauma/sepsis and can serve as an experimental platform for answering clinically relevant questions. Recently, the lay press severely criticized the translational relevance of mouse models in critical care medicine. A series of provocative editorials were elicited by a highly publicized research report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS; February 2013), which identified an unrecognized gene expression profile mismatch between human and murine leukocytes following burn/trauma/endotoxemia. Based on their data, the authors concluded that mouse models of trauma/inflammation are unsuitable for studying corresponding human conditions. We believe this conclusion was not justified. In conjunction with resulting negative commentary in the popular press, it can seriously jeopardize future basic research in critical care medicine. We will address some limitations of that PNAS report to provide a framework for discussing its conclusions and attempt to present a balanced summary of strengths/weaknesses of use of mouse models. While many investigators agree that animal research is a central component for improved patient outcomes, it is important to acknowledge known limitations in clinical translation from mouse to man. The scientific community is responsible to discuss valid limitations without overinterpretation. Hopefully, a balanced view of the strengths/weaknesses of using animals for trauma/endotoxemia/critical care research will not result in hasty discount of the clear need for using animals to advance treatment of critically ill patients