Humoral and cellular immune correlates of protection against COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients.

peer reviewedAs solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk of severe COVID-19 and respond poorly to primary SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, they have been prioritized for booster vaccination. However, an immunological correlate of protection has not been identified in this vulnerable population. We conducted a prospective monocentric cohort study of 65 kidney transplant recipients who received 3 doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Associations among breakthrough infection (BTI), vaccine responses, and patient characteristics were explored in 54 patients. Symptomatic COVID-19 was diagnosed in 32% of kidney transplant recipients during a period of 6 months after booster vaccination. During this period, SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron were the dominant variants in the general population. Univariate Analyses identified the avidity of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain binding IgG, neutralizing antibodies, and SARS-CoV-2 S2-specific interferon gamma responses as correlates of protection against BTI. No demographic or clinical parameter correlated with the risk of BTI. In multivariate analysis, the risk of BTI was best predicted by neutralizing antibody and S2-specific interferon gamma responses. In conclusion, T cell responses may help compensate for the suboptimal antibody response to booster vaccination in kidney transplant recipients. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings

Hybrid Immunity Overcomes Defective Immune Response to COVID-19 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

peer reviewed[en] INTRODUCTION: Comorbidities and immunosuppressive therapies are associated with reduced immune responses to primary COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). In healthy individuals, prior SARS-COV-2 infection is associated with increased vaccine responses, a phenotype called hybrid immunity. In this study, we explored the potential influence of immune suppression on hybrid immunity in KTRs. METHODS: Eighty-two KTRs, including 59 SARS-CoV-2-naïve (naïve KTRs [N-KTRs]) and 23 SARS-CoV-2-experienced (experienced KTRs [E-KTRs]) patients, were prospectively studied and compared to 106 healthy controls (HCs), including 40 SARS-CoV-2-naïve (N-HCs) and 66 SARS-CoV-2-experienced (E-HCs) subjects. Polyfunctional antibody and T cell responses were measured following 2 doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Associations between vaccine responses and clinical characteristics were studied by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In naïve KTRs, vaccine responses were markedly lower than in HCs and were correlated with older age, more recent transplantation, kidney retransplantation after graft failure, arterial hypertension, and treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). In contrast, vaccine responses of E-KTRs were similar to those of HCs and were associated with time between transplantation and vaccination, but not with the other risk factors associated with low vaccine responses in naïve KTRs. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, hybrid immunity overcomes immune suppression and provides potent humoral and cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in KTRs

Necrotrophism Is a Quorum-Sensing-Regulated Lifestyle in Bacillus thuringiensis

How pathogenic bacteria infect and kill their host is currently widely investigated. In comparison, the fate of pathogens after the death of their host receives less attention. We studied Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) infection of an insect host, and show that NprR, a quorum sensor, is active after death of the insect and allows Bt to survive in the cadavers as vegetative cells. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that NprR regulates at least 41 genes, including many encoding degradative enzymes or proteins involved in the synthesis of a nonribosomal peptide named kurstakin. These degradative enzymes are essential in vitro to degrade several substrates and are specifically expressed after host death suggesting that Bt has an active necrotrophic lifestyle in the cadaver. We show that kurstakin is essential for Bt survival during necrotrophic development. It is required for swarming mobility and biofilm formation, presumably through a pore forming activity. A nprR deficient mutant does not develop necrotrophically and does not sporulate efficiently in the cadaver. We report that necrotrophism is a highly regulated mechanism essential for the Bt infectious cycle, contributing to spore spreading

Do MICA antibodies impact on renal graft outcomes?

La transplantation rénale représente le traitement de choix de l’insuffisance rénale terminale parce qu’il offre une espérance de vie plus longue et une meilleure qualité de vie.Néanmoins, l’accès à la transplantation est limité par la pénurie d’organes et dans certains cas, par la présence d’anticorps anti-HLA avant la greffe.Bien que la présence d’anticorps anti-HLA spécifiques du donneur avant ou après la greffe ait été associée au rejet aigu et à la perte chronique d’allogreffe, un rejet humoral tant aigu que chronique peut survenir sans que ces anticorps soient détectables dans le sérum, suggérant que des réponses autologues ou allo-immunes contre des antigènes dits « mineurs » pourraient jouer un rôle dans le rejet et la perte de greffe.MICA, en raison de son polymorphisme important, est considéré aujourd’hui comme un des systèmes antigéniques mineurs les plus robustes par sa capacité à induire des allo-anticorps. Cependant, un effet pathogène des anticorps anti-MICA sur le greffon rénal demeure à ce jour, non formellement établi.Le but de la présente recherche a été d’étudier l’épidémiologie des anticorps anti-MICA à partir d’une large cohorte de volontaires sains et de patients atteints d’insuffisance rénale chronique terminale, de déterminer les facteurs de risque d’immunisation contre MICA, de spécifier la nature autologue ou allogénique de ces anticorps et d’évaluer au sein des patients ultérieurement transplantés, l’impact de ces anticorps sur le rejet et la survie de greffe. La méthode utilisée pour l’identification des anticorps anti-MICA est la technique Luminex, consistant à faire réagir du sérum avec des billes de polystyrène tapissées par un seul antigène MICA recombinant, l’intensité de la liaison antigène-anticorps étant révélée par un fluorocytomètre suite à l’adjonction d’un second anticorps anti-IgG couplé à une substance fluorescente.Nous avons identifié la grossesse, les transfusions sanguines, la greffe préalable et également l’urémie comme étant des facteurs de risque indépendants d’immunisation contre MICA. Nous n’avons pas observé d’effet délétère des anticorps anti-MICA sur la survie à long terme du greffon rénal alors que les anticorps anti-MICA ont été plus fréquents chez les patients dits «à haut risque immunologique» et en particulier chez les patients immunisés contre le HLA.Nos résultats suggèrent que plutôt d’être pathogènes, les anticorps anti-MICA pourraient être simplement des marqueurs de haut risque immunologique. Ceci remet donc en question l’utilité d’un monitoring des anticorps anti-MICA par la technologie Luminex. Renal transplantation represents the treatment of choice of stage V chronic kidney disease by offering a longer life expectancy and a better quality of life than dialysis. Nevertheless, the access to transplantation is limited by the shortage of organs and, in some cases, by the presence of HLA antibodies before transplantation. While the presence of either preformed or post-transplant donor specific anti-HLA antibodies has been associated with acute rejection or chronic graft loss, acute or chronic antibody-mediated injury may also occur in the absence of detectable anti-HLA antibodies, suggesting that autologuous or allo-immune response to other relevant minor or non-HLA antigenic determinants might play a role in rejection and subsequent graft loss. Especially, MHC class I-related chain A (MICA), a highly polymorphic minor antigenic system, is now considered to be the most robust minor antigenic system capable of inducing allo-antibodies. However, the possible deleterious effect of MICA antibodies has not been formerly established yet.The goal of the following work was to determine the risk factors for MICA sensitization, to specify the autologuous or allogeneic nature of MICA antibodies and to assess the impact of preformed and 1 yr post-transplant MICA antibodies on defined renal graft outcomes in large cohorts of patients. The method employed for the identification of MICA antibodies was a Luminex single antigen beads assay. We found that pregnancy, previous blood transfusion, previous graft as well as chronic kidney disease were independent risk factors for MICA sensitization.Even if we had found a higher frequency of MICA antibodies in patients at higher immunological risk and especially, MICA antibodies had been closely associated with HLA sensitization, we showed a lack of a deleterious effect of MICA antibodies on long-term renal graft outcomes. Our findings suggest that MICA antibodies are merely surrogate markers of high immunological risk and really question the monitoring of MICA antibodies by the presently available MICA single antigen flow beads assays. Doctorat en Sciences médicalesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublishe

Do MICA antibodies impact on renal graft outcomes?

La transplantation rénale représente le traitement de choix de l’insuffisance rénale terminale parce qu’il offre une espérance de vie plus longue et une meilleure qualité de vie.Néanmoins, l’accès à la transplantation est limité par la pénurie d’organes et dans certains cas, par la présence d’anticorps anti-HLA avant la greffe.Bien que la présence d’anticorps anti-HLA spécifiques du donneur avant ou après la greffe ait été associée au rejet aigu et à la perte chronique d’allogreffe, un rejet humoral tant aigu que chronique peut survenir sans que ces anticorps soient détectables dans le sérum, suggérant que des réponses autologues ou allo-immunes contre des antigènes dits « mineurs » pourraient jouer un rôle dans le rejet et la perte de greffe.MICA, en raison de son polymorphisme important, est considéré aujourd’hui comme un des systèmes antigéniques mineurs les plus robustes par sa capacité à induire des allo-anticorps. Cependant, un effet pathogène des anticorps anti-MICA sur le greffon rénal demeure à ce jour, non formellement établi.Le but de la présente recherche a été d’étudier l’épidémiologie des anticorps anti-MICA à partir d’une large cohorte de volontaires sains et de patients atteints d’insuffisance rénale chronique terminale, de déterminer les facteurs de risque d’immunisation contre MICA, de spécifier la nature autologue ou allogénique de ces anticorps et d’évaluer au sein des patients ultérieurement transplantés, l’impact de ces anticorps sur le rejet et la survie de greffe. La méthode utilisée pour l’identification des anticorps anti-MICA est la technique Luminex, consistant à faire réagir du sérum avec des billes de polystyrène tapissées par un seul antigène MICA recombinant, l’intensité de la liaison antigène-anticorps étant révélée par un fluorocytomètre suite à l’adjonction d’un second anticorps anti-IgG couplé à une substance fluorescente.Nous avons identifié la grossesse, les transfusions sanguines, la greffe préalable et également l’urémie comme étant des facteurs de risque indépendants d’immunisation contre MICA. Nous n’avons pas observé d’effet délétère des anticorps anti-MICA sur la survie à long terme du greffon rénal alors que les anticorps anti-MICA ont été plus fréquents chez les patients dits «à haut risque immunologique» et en particulier chez les patients immunisés contre le HLA.Nos résultats suggèrent que plutôt d’être pathogènes, les anticorps anti-MICA pourraient être simplement des marqueurs de haut risque immunologique. Ceci remet donc en question l’utilité d’un monitoring des anticorps anti-MICA par la technologie Luminex. Renal transplantation represents the treatment of choice of stage V chronic kidney disease by offering a longer life expectancy and a better quality of life than dialysis. Nevertheless, the access to transplantation is limited by the shortage of organs and, in some cases, by the presence of HLA antibodies before transplantation. While the presence of either preformed or post-transplant donor specific anti-HLA antibodies has been associated with acute rejection or chronic graft loss, acute or chronic antibody-mediated injury may also occur in the absence of detectable anti-HLA antibodies, suggesting that autologuous or allo-immune response to other relevant minor or non-HLA antigenic determinants might play a role in rejection and subsequent graft loss. Especially, MHC class I-related chain A (MICA), a highly polymorphic minor antigenic system, is now considered to be the most robust minor antigenic system capable of inducing allo-antibodies. However, the possible deleterious effect of MICA antibodies has not been formerly established yet.The goal of the following work was to determine the risk factors for MICA sensitization, to specify the autologuous or allogeneic nature of MICA antibodies and to assess the impact of preformed and 1 yr post-transplant MICA antibodies on defined renal graft outcomes in large cohorts of patients. The method employed for the identification of MICA antibodies was a Luminex single antigen beads assay. We found that pregnancy, previous blood transfusion, previous graft as well as chronic kidney disease were independent risk factors for MICA sensitization.Even if we had found a higher frequency of MICA antibodies in patients at higher immunological risk and especially, MICA antibodies had been closely associated with HLA sensitization, we showed a lack of a deleterious effect of MICA antibodies on long-term renal graft outcomes. Our findings suggest that MICA antibodies are merely surrogate markers of high immunological risk and really question the monitoring of MICA antibodies by the presently available MICA single antigen flow beads assays. Doctorat en Sciences médicalesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublishe

Biological and clinical relevance of the Luminex® crossmatch: a one center study on 117 kidney transplantations

info:eu-repo/semantics/published26th European Immunogenetics and Histocompatibility Conference, May 2012, Liverpool, U

A propos de 6 cas de fibrose systémique néphrogénique: le gadodiamide n'est pas un facteur déclenchant incontournable

info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublishe

In Reply

SCOPUS: le.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

An atypical case of Whipple's disease: Case report and review of the literature

SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Liddle’s syndrome in an old women: a case report

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe