14 research outputs found
The Top Patient Safety Strategies That Can Be Encouraged for Adoption Now
Over the past 12 years, since the publication of the Institute of Medicine's report, âTo Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System,â improving patient safety has been the focus of considerable public and professional interest. Although such efforts required changes in policies; education; workforce; and health care financing, organization, and delivery, the most important gap has arguably been in research. Specifically, to improve patient safety we needed to identify hazards, determine how to measure them accurately, and identify solutions that work to reduce patient harm. A 2001 report commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, âMaking Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practicesâ (1), helped identify some early evidence-based safety practices, but it also highlighted an enormous gap between what was known and what needed to be known
The Top Patient Safety Strategies That Can Be Encouraged for Adoption Now
Over the past 12 years, since the publication of the Institute of Medicine's report, âTo Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System,â improving patient safety has been the focus of considerable public and professional interest. Although such efforts required changes in policies; education; workforce; and health care financing, organization, and delivery, the most important gap has arguably been in research. Specifically, to improve patient safety we needed to identify hazards, determine how to measure them accurately, and identify solutions that work to reduce patient harm. A 2001 report commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, âMaking Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practicesâ (1), helped identify some early evidence-based safety practices, but it also highlighted an enormous gap between what was known and what needed to be known
Advancing the Science of Patient Safety
Waiting for permission from publisher.Despite a decade's worth of effort, patient safety has improved slowly, in part because of the limited evidence base for the development and widespread dissemination of successful patient safety practices. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality sponsored an international group of experts in patient safety and evaluation methods to develop criteria to improve the design, evaluation, and reporting of practice research in patient safety. This article reports the findings and recommendations of this group, which include greater use of theory and logic models, more detailed descriptions of interventions and their implementation, enhanced explanation of desired and unintended outcomes, and better description and measurement of context and of how context influences interventions. Using these criteria and measuring and reporting contexts will improve the science of patient safety
In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review
Background: The paper hand-held record (PHR) has been widely used as a tool to facilitate communication between health care providers and a pregnant woman. Since its inception in the 1950s, it has been described as a successful initiative, evolving to meet the needs of communities and their providers. Increasingly, the electronic health record (EHR) has dominated the healthcare arena and the maternity general practice shared-care arrangement seems to have adopted this initiative. A systematic review was conducted to determine perspectives of the PHR and the EHR with regards to data completeness; experiences of users and integration of care between women and health care providers