A systems view of risk factors for knee osteoarthritis reveals insights into the pathogenesis of the disease.

Early detection of osteoarthritis (OA) remains a critical yet unsolved multifaceted problem. To address the multifaceted nature of OA a systems model was developed to consolidate a number of observations on the biological, mechanical and structural components of OA and identify features common to the primary risk factors for OA (aging, obesity and joint trauma) that are present prior to the development of clinical OA. This analysis supports a unified view of the pathogenesis of OA such that the risk for developing OA emerges when one of the components of the disease (e.g., mechanical) becomes abnormal, and it is the interaction with the other components (e.g., biological and/or structural) that influences the ultimate convergence to cartilage breakdown and progression to clinical OA. The model, applied in a stimulus-response format, demonstrated that a mechanical stimulus at baseline can enhance the sensitivity of a biomarker to predict cartilage thinning in a 5 year follow-up in patients with knee OA. The systems approach provides new insight into the pathogenesis of the disease and offers the basis for developing multidisciplinary studies to address early detection and treatment at a stage in the disease where disease modification has the greatest potential for a successful outcome

Analyzing Femorotibial Cartilage Thickness Using Anatomically Standardized Maps: Reproducibility and Reference Data.

Alterations in cartilage thickness (CTh) are a hallmark of knee osteoarthritis, which remain difficult to characterize at high resolution, even with modern magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), due to a paucity of standardization tools. This study aimed to assess a computational anatomy method producing standardized two-dimensional femorotibial CTh maps. The method was assessed with twenty knees, processed following three common experimental scenarios. Cartilage thickness maps were obtained for the femorotibial cartilages by reconstructing bone and cartilage mesh models in tree-dimension, calculating three-dimensional CTh maps, and anatomically standardizing the maps. The intra-operator accuracy (median (interquartile range, IQR) of -0.006 (0.045) mm), precision (0.152 (0.070) mm), entropy (7.02 (0.71) and agreement (0.975 (0.020))) results suggested that the method is adequate to capture the spatial variations in CTh and compare knees at varying osteoarthritis stages. The lower inter-operator precision (0.496 (0.132) mm) and agreement (0.808 (0.108)) indicate a possible loss of sensitivity to detect differences in a setting with multiple operators. The results confirmed the promising potential of anatomically standardized maps, with the lower inter-operator reproducibility stressing the need to coordinate operators. This study also provided essential reference data and indications for future research using CTh maps

Diverse parameters of ambulatory knee moments differ with medial knee osteoarthritis severity and are combinable into a severity index.

Objective: To characterize ambulatory knee moments with respect to medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) severity comprehensively and to assess the possibility of developing a severity index combining knee moment parameters. Methods: Nine parameters (peak amplitudes) commonly used to quantify three-dimensional knee moments during walking were analyzed for 98 individuals (58.7 ± 9.2 years old, 1.69 ± 0.09 m, 76.9 ± 14.5 kg, 56% female), corresponding to three medial knee osteoarthritis severity groups: non-osteoarthritis (n = 22), mild osteoarthritis (n = 38) and severe osteoarthritis (n = 38). Multinomial logistic regression was used to create a severity index. Comparison and regression analyses were performed with respect to disease severity. Results: Six of the nine moment parameters differed statistically significantly among severity groups (p ≤ 0.039) and five reported statistically significant correlation with disease severity (0.23 ≤ |r| ≤ 0.59). The proposed severity index was highly reliable (ICC = 0.96) and statistically significantly different between the three groups (p < 0.001) as well as correlated with disease severity (r = 0.70). Conclusion: While medial knee osteoarthritis research has mostly focused on a few knee moment parameters, this study showed that other parameters differ with disease severity. In particular, it shed light on three parameters frequently disregarded in prior works. Another important finding is the possibility of combining the parameters into a severity index, which opens promising perspectives based on a single figure assessing the knee moments in their entirety. Although the proposed index was shown to be reliable and associated with disease severity, further research will be necessary particularly to assess its validity

Is increased joint loading detrimental to obese patients with knee osteoarthritis? A secondary data analysis from a randomized trial

SummaryObjectiveTo investigate whether increased knee joint loading due to improved ambulatory function and walking speed following weight loss achieved over 16 weeks accelerates symptomatic and structural disease progression over a subsequent 1 year weight maintenance period in an obese population with knee osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsData from a prospective study of weight loss in obese patients with knee OA (the CARtilage in obese knee OsteoarThritis (CAROT) study) were used to determine changes in knee joint compressive loadings (model estimated) during walking after a successful 16 week weight loss intervention. The participants were divided into ‘Unloaders’ (participants that reduced joint loads) and ‘Loaders’ (participants that increased joint loads). The primary symptomatic outcome was changes in knee symptoms, measured with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire, during a subsequent 52 weeks weight maintenance period. The primary structural outcome was changes in tibiofemoral cartilage loss assessed semi-quantitatively (Boston Leeds Knee Osteoarthritis Score (BLOKS) from MRI after the 52 weight maintenance period.Results157 participants (82% of the CAROT cohort) with medial and/or lateral knee OA were classified as Unloaders (n = 100) or Loaders (n = 57). The groups showed similar significant changes in symptoms (group difference: −2.4 KOOS points [95% CI −6.8:1.9]) and cartilage loss (group difference: −0.06 BLOKS points [95% CI −0.22:0.11) after 1 year, with no statistically significant differences between Loaders and Unloaders.ConclusionFor obese patients undergoing a significant weight loss, increased knee joint loading for 1 year was not associated with accelerated symptomatic and structural disease progression compared to a similar weight loss group that had reduced ambulatory compressive knee joint loads.Clinicaltrials.govNCT00655941