28 research outputs found
General practice, multimorbidity and evidence based policy making: a key challenge
no abstract availabl
Job stressors and coping strategies as predictors of mental health and job satisfaction among Irish general practitioners.
Previous research has shown that many general practitioners were experiencing stress levels detrimental to their well-being. To examine coping strategies of Irish general practitioners and the possible impact of their stress on mental health and job satisfaction. Anonymous questionnaires were posted to 226 general practitioners in the Western Health Board. Just over one third of stressors caused moderate to considerable stress. Coping was important in the stress process. Sometimes, coping strategies predicted stress-related outcomes better than stressors. General practitioners' mental health was slightly better than that of a normative group. They tended to be satisfied with all aspects of the job, except hours of work. The provision of counselling services for general practitioners suffering from stress should be encouraged. Stress-management strategies should include training in coping skills and time management. The increased use of co-operatives could help alleviate the stress of out-of-hours work.</p
Effect of rurality on patients’ satisfaction with out of hours care provided by a family doctor cooperative’
Introduction: Reacting to demand and supply pressures, European healthcare systems are undergoing significant structural changes to the organisation and delivery of out of hours care. Such pressures are of particular concern to rural practice. Although patient satisfaction with out of hours care has been extensively studied, the effect of rurality on satisfaction levels has not, to our knowledge, been previously examined. Objective: To investigate whether rurality has an influence on patient satisfaction with out of hours care provided by a family doctor co-operative.
Methods: All patients contacting the service over a designated 24-day period were forwarded a postal questionnaire. Patients' satisfaction was measured using a version of the McKinley questionnaire, and rurality, by subjective patient assessment, distance from treatment centre or previous rota cover.
Results: The response rate was 55% (531/966). Overall satisfaction levels were high with 88% of patients rating the service as either good or excellent. 47.8% of respondents perceived themselves as living in a town, 14.6% as living in a village, and 37.6% as living in the countryside. Perceived rurality, distance from treatment centre or previous rota cover did not significantly affect satisfaction levels.
Conclusion: Family doctor co-operatives have significantly altered the way out of hours care is delivered. Patients from rural areas are equally satisfied with the provision of out of hours care by co-operatives, as urban patients. Extension of co-operatives to rural areas need not be constrained by concerns regarding decreased patient satisfaction
Responses to language barriers in consultations with refugees and asylum seekers: a telephone survey of Irish general practitioners
Background: Refugees and asylum seekers experience language barriers in general practice.
Qualitative studies have found that responses to language barriers in general practice are ad hoc
with use of both professional interpreters and informal interpreters (patients' relatives or friends).
However, the scale of the issues involved is unknown. This study quantifies the need for language
assistance in general practice consultations and examines the experience of, and satisfaction with,
methods of language assistance utilized.
Methods: Data were collected by telephone survey with general practitioners in a regional health
authority in Ireland between July-August 2004. Each respondent was asked a series of questions
about consulting with refugees and asylum seekers, the need for language assistance and the kind
of language assistance used.
Results: There was a 70% (n = 56/80) response rate to the telephone survey. The majority of
respondents (77%) said that they had experienced consultations with refugees and asylum seekers
in which language assistance was required. Despite this, general practitioners in the majority of
cases managed without an interpreter or used informal methods of interpretation. In fact, when
given a choice general practitioners would more often choose informal over professional methods
of interpretation despite the fact that confidentiality was a significant concern.
Conclusion: The need for language assistance in consultations with refugees and asylum seekers
in Irish general practice is high. General practitioners rely on informal responses. It is necessary to
improve knowledge about the organisational contexts that shape general practitioners responses.
We also recommend dialogue between general practitioners, patients and interpreters about the
relative merits of informal and professional methods of interpretation so that general practitioners'
choices are responsive to the needs of patients with limited English
Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension (Review)
Background Patients with high blood pressure (hypertension) in the community frequently fail to meet treatment goals - a condition labelled as "uncontrolled" hypertension. The optimal way to organize and deliver care to hypertensive patients has not been clearly identified. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of interventions to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. To evaluate the effectiveness of reminders on improving the follow-up of patients with hypertension. Search methods All-language search of all articles (any year) in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) and Medline; and Embase from January 1980. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with hypertension that evaluated the following interventions: (1) self-monitoring (2) educational interventions directed to the patient (3) educational interventions directed to the health professional (4) health professional (nurse or pharmacist) led care (5) organisational interventions that aimed to improve the delivery of care (6) appointment reminder systems
Outcomes assessed were: (1) mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (2) control of blood pressure (3) proportion of patients followed up at clinic Data collection and analysis Two authors extracted data independently and in duplicate and assessed each study according to the criteria outlined by the Cochrane Handbook
Self–monitoring and other non–pharmacological interventions to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review
Background Patients with high blood pressure (hypertension) in the community frequently fail to meet treatment goals: a condition labelled as ‘uncontrolled’ hypertension. The optimal way to organise and deliver care to hypertensive patients has not been clearly identified. Aim To determine the effectiveness of interventions to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Design of study Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Setting Primary and ambulatory care. Method Interventions were categorised as following: selfmonitoring; educational interventions directed to the patient; educational interventions directed to the health professional; health professional- (nurse or pharmacist) led care; organisational interventions that aimed to improve the delivery of care; and appointment reminder systems. Outcomes assessed were mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, control of blood pressure and proportion of patients followed up at clinic. Results Seventy-two RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The trials showed a wide variety of methodological quality. Selfmonitoring was associated with net reductions in systolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference [WMD] –2.5mmHg, 95%CI = –3.7 to –1.3 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD –1.8mmHg, 95%CI = –2.4 to –1.2 mmHg). An organised system of regular review allied to vigorous antihypertensive drug therapy was shown to reduce blood pressure and all-cause mortality in a single large randomised controlled trial. Conclusion Antihypertensive drug therapy should be implemented by means of a vigorous stepped care approach when patients do not reach target blood pressure levels. Selfmonitoring is a useful adjunct to care while reminder systems and nurse/pharmacist -led care require further evaluation
A survey of asylum seekers' general practice service utilisation and morbidity patterns
To compare Irish asylum seekers to other General Medical Scheme (GMS) patients possessing Irish citizenship in terms
of their utilisation of GP services, morbidity patterns and consultation outcomes. A retrospective 1 year study on
patient records in two Galway City practices was performed. All asylum seekers who were patients of the two practices
were compared with two controls each from a population of GMS patients with Irish citizenship matched for age, sex,
and GMS status. Demographic information was recorded. For each consultation over the 12 months the diagnosis using the
ICPC coding system1 and consultation outcomes were recorded. Data was collected on 171 asylum seekers and 342 Irish
citizens. The majority of asylum seekers registered in the two practices were from Nigeria (43.9%). The age of cases
ranged from 1 month to 60 years of age with a median of 26. 45.8% were female and 54% male. The mean number of visits
per asylum seeker per year was 5.16 (SD 3.12) whereas the mean for Irish Citizens was 2.31(SD 2.33) (p = 0.0001).
Asylum seekers had a significantly higher likelihood of being assigned diagnoses in the disease systems of psychiatry,
dermatology, neurology, musculoskeletal disease, urology, respiratory, ENT, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and
gastroenterology. Asylum seekers were five times more likely to be diagnosed with psychiatric illness than Irish
citizens. Specifically they had a significantly higher chance of being diagnosed with anxiety (odds ratio =3.17[95% CI
1.1, 8.68]). Overall, the frequency of prescription as a consultation outcome was higher for asylum seekers. Asylum
seekers were prescribed more antibiotics and psychiatric medications but Irish GMS had higher prescription rates for
drugs outside of these categories. Referral rates were higher in the asylum seeker group. Asylum seekers attended the
GP more frequently than their Irish counterparts. They were more likely to be diagnosed with psychological problems
than the Irish. Studies have shown a strong link between psychological illness and being a frequent attender in
general practice2, 3. This could explain the higher than average frequency of attendance in this group. They were more
likely to be prescribed antibiotics and psychiatric medications. This study provides the first quantitative data to
inform debate regarding the appropriate supply of resources to Irish practices with significant numbers of asylum
seekers
WestREN: a description of an Irish academic general practice research network
Background: Primary care research networks have been established internationally since the 1960s to enable diverse practitioners to engage in and develop research and education and implement research evidence. The newly established Western Research and Education Network (WestREN) is one such network consisting of a collaboration between the Discipline of General Practice at NUI Galway and 71 West of Ireland general practices. In September 2009 all member practices were issued with a questionnaire with two objectives: to describe the structure and characteristics of the member practices and to compare the results to the national profile of Irish general practice.
Methods: A postal survey was used followed by one written and one email reminder.
Results: A response rate of 73% (52/71) was achieved after two reminders. Half of practices were in a rural location, one quarter located in an urban setting and another quarter in a mixed location. Ninety-four per cent of general practitioners practice from purpose-built or adapted premises with under 6% of practices being attached to the general practitioner's residence. Over 96% of general practitioners use appointment systems with 58% using appointment only. All practices surveyed were computerised, with 80% describing their practices as 'fully computerised'. Almost 60% of general practitioners are coding chronic diagnoses with 20% coding individual consultations. Twenty-five per cent of general practitioners were single-handed with the majority of practices having at least two general practitioners, and a mean number of general practitioners of 2.4. Ninety-two per cent of practices employed a practice nurse with 30% employing more than one nurse. Compared to the national profile, WestREN practices appear somewhat larger, and more likely to be purpose-built and in rural areas. National trends apparent between 1982 and 1992, such as increasing computerisation and practice nurse availability, appear to be continuing.
Conclusions: WestREN is a new university-affiliated general practice research network in Ireland. Survey of its initial membership confirms WestREN practices to be broadly representative of the national profile and has provided us with valuable information on the current and changing structure of Irish general practice
Helping each other to learn – a process evaluation of peer assisted learning
Background: The benefits of Peer Assisted Learning (PAL) are well established with positive
effects on examination scores, student satisfaction and personal and professional development
reported. PAL is increasingly utilised as a resource within medical education where the restrictions
on resources have forced teachers to look at creating new educational environments which can be
delivered at a lower cost. This study sought to evaluate the processes at work as the emphasis of
PAL research to date has largely been on the consideration of student outcomes.
Methods: Fifth-year medical undergraduates, who had completed their communication skills
modular training and attended a preparatory workshop, facilitated a role-play session for their
second-year colleagues within an Early Patient Contact programme. Semi-structured interviews
and focus groups were used to collect data at different time points in order to establish the views
of peer learners and tutors towards this new method of teaching. The data was analysed according
to the principles framework analysis using N-vivo software. Themes were shared and debated with
the multidisciplinary team of authors and a concordance of views on common themes was reached
after discussion and debate.
Results: Analysis of the data resulted in the emergence of three thematic categories: Learning
Environment, Educational Exchange and Communication and Modelling. The data demonstrated a
concordance of the views between peer tutors and learners on barriers and levers of this approach
as well as a heightened awareness of the learning environment and the educational exchange
occurring therein.
Conclusion: The data is significant as it not only demonstrates a high level of acceptability among
tutors and learners for PAL but also indicates the reciprocity of educational exchange that appears
to occur within the PAL setting. This study highlights some of the unique characteristics of PAL and
we recommend the development of further qualitative studies around peer learners and tutors
views of this process
Blood pressure control in patients with a previous stroke/transient ischaemic attack in primary care in Ireland: a cross sectional study
Background: Uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) is an important modifiable risk factor for
recurrent stroke. Secondary prevention measures when implemented can reduce stroke
re-occurrence by 80%. However, hypertension control rates remain sub-optimal, and little
data is available from primary care where most management occurs. The aim of this
study was to describe BP control in primary care-based patients with a previous stroke or
transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in Ireland, and to concurrently examine antihypertensive
medication-dosing. Methods: Study participants most recent office-based BP reading
was compared with the NICE (NG136) and European Society of Hypertension/ European
Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC 2013) goal of BP < 140/90 mmHg. Optimal anti-hypertensive medication dosing was determined by benchmarking prescribed doses
for each drug with the World Health Organisation-Defined Daily Dosing (WHO-DDD)
recommendations. Results: We identified 328 patients with a previous stroke or TIA in
10 practices. Blood pressure was controlled in almost two thirds of patients when measured against the ESH/ESC and NICE guidelines (63.1%, n = 207). Of those with BP ≥140/90 (n = 116), just under half (n = 44, 47.3%) were adequately dosed in all anti-hypertensive medications when compared with the WHO-DDD recommendations. Conclusion: Blood pressure control in patients post stroke/TIA appears sub-optimal in over one third of patients. A comparison of drug doses with WHO-DDD recommendations suggests that 47% of patients may benefit from drug-dose improvements. Further work is required to assess how best to manage blood pressure in patients with a previous stroke or TIA in Primary Care, as most consultations for hypertension take place in this setting