How future surgery will benefit from SARS-COV-2-related measures: a SPIGC survey conveying the perspective of Italian surgeons

COVID-19 negatively affected surgical activity, but the potential benefits resulting from adopted measures remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in surgical activity and potential benefit from COVID-19 measures in perspective of Italian surgeons on behalf of SPIGC. A nationwide online survey on surgical practice before, during, and after COVID-19 pandemic was conducted in March-April 2022 (NCT:05323851). Effects of COVID-19 hospital-related measures on surgical patients' management and personal professional development across surgical specialties were explored. Data on demographics, pre-operative/peri-operative/post-operative management, and professional development were collected. Outcomes were matched with the corresponding volume. Four hundred and seventy-three respondents were included in final analysis across 14 surgical specialties. Since SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, application of telematic consultations (4.1% vs. 21.6%; p < 0.0001) and diagnostic evaluations (16.4% vs. 42.2%; p < 0.0001) increased. Elective surgical activities significantly reduced and surgeons opted more frequently for conservative management with a possible indication for elective (26.3% vs. 35.7%; p < 0.0001) or urgent (20.4% vs. 38.5%; p < 0.0001) surgery. All new COVID-related measures are perceived to be maintained in the future. Surgeons' personal education online increased from 12.6% (pre-COVID) to 86.6% (post-COVID; p < 0.0001). Online educational activities are considered a beneficial effect from COVID pandemic (56.4%). COVID-19 had a great impact on surgical specialties, with significant reduction of operation volume. However, some forced changes turned out to be benefits. Isolation measures pushed the use of telemedicine and telemetric devices for outpatient practice and favored communication for educational purposes and surgeon-patient/family communication. From the Italian surgeons' perspective, COVID-related measures will continue to influence future surgical clinical practice

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma complete regression after preoperative chemotherapy: Surgical results in a small series

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) becomes a systemic disease from an early stage. Complete surgical resection remains the only validated and potentially curative treatment; disappointingly only 20% of patients present with a resectable tumour. Although a complete pathological regression (pCR) after the preoperative chemotherapy could intuitively lead to better outcomes and prolonged survival some reports highlighted significant rates of recurrence. Cases Presentation: We describe three cases of pCR following preoperative chemotherapy for PDAC. The first two cases received neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX and PAX-G scheme for borderline resectable PDAC. Recurrence appeared 9 and 12 months after surgery. Although both patients started adjuvant therapy straight after the diagnosis of recurrence, the disease rapidly progressed and led them to death 12 and 15 months after surgery. The third case was characterized by germline BRCA2 mutation. The patient presented with PDAC of the body, intrapancreatic biliary stenosis and suspected peritoneal metastasis. One year later, after first and second-line chemotherapy, she underwent explorative laparoscopy and total spleno-pancreatectomy without evidence of viable tumour cells in the surgical specimen. At six months she is recurrence-free. Conclusions: Very few reports describe a complete pathological response following preoperative chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. We observed three cases in the last three years with disappointing oncological results. Further investigations are needed to predict PDAC prognosis in pCR after chemotherapy

Influence of goserelin depot therapy on epidermal growth factor receptor expression in pelvic endometriosis.

We have studied epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor expression in endometrium and in endometriotic implants, testing a group of 36 women before and after a 4-month gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog (GnRH-a) goserelin depot treatment. Each woman underwent laparoscopy twice. At the initial laparoscopy, before starting treatment, the disease was staged according to the American Fertility Society (AFS) classification and biopsies of endometriotic implants were undertaken. The follow-up laparoscopy was performed within 5 weeks of the last GnRH-a administration. Biopsies were taken from areas of previously noted disease, both visually persistent and visually free of disease. At the time of each laparoscopy, photographs of all areas of disease were taken. Specimens of eutopic endometrium were collected from each patient at the time of laparoscopy by a Novak curette. Endometrial and endometriotic samples were processed for immunohistochemical detection of EGF receptor, using anti-EGF receptor monoclonal antibody Ab-3. After treatment, the marked improvement of AFS score was associated with a dramatic reduction of EGF receptor immunostaining, but the exact meaning of this finding is still not completely understood. The dramatic reduction of EGF receptor expression in eutopic and ectopic endometrium samples after treatment is not obviously related to the hypoestrogenism induced by the drug. It has been suggested that steroid hormones and EGF play a role in regulation of EGF receptor expression, so that drugs such as goserelin depot could act directly at local peripheral level influencing the EGF receptor expression via the production of its ligand