Forestry for a low carbon future. Integrating forests and wood products in climate change strategies

Following the introduction, Chapter 2 provides an overview of mitigation in the forest sector, addressing the handling of forests under UNFCCC. Chapters 3 to 5 focus on forest-based mitigation options – afforestation, reforestation, REDD+ and forest management – and Chapters 6 and 7 focus on wood-product based options – wood energy and green building and furnishing. The publication describes these activities in the context of UNFCCC rules, assessing their mitigation potential and economic attrac tiveness as well as opportunities and challenges for implementation. Chapter 8 discusses the different considerations involved in choosing the right mix of options as well as some of the instruments and means for implementation. Chapter 8 also highlights the co-benefits generated by forest-based mitigation and emphasizes that economic assessment of mitigation options needs to take these benefits into account. The concluding chapter assesses national commitments under UNFCCC involving forest miti gation and summarizes the challenges and opportunities

Definitions for hydration changes of hydrogel lenses

Authors of studies on the hydration characteristics of hydrogel lenses have used a variety of definitions to describe the changes observed with exposure of the lenses to different environments. This has resulted in difficulties in the interpretation of published data. In particular, the single term "percentage dehydration" has been used to denote different mathematical expressions for alterations to the lens composition. A detailed theoretical analysis of hydrogel hydration levels is presented to examine definitions for lens hydration changes, compare results obtained under different definitions and propose appropriate usage for the alternative definitions according to the aspect of lens performance under consideration. The interrelationships between the commonly used definitions of dehydration are shown to be independent of initial lens mass but dependent on initial water content. Typically, higher water content lenses undergo considerably larger mass changes than lower water content lenses, an effect that may be masked if these changes are presented as changes of water content. There are a number of clinical consequences of lens dehydration, the importance of which will vary depending on the initial lens water content. It is therefore essential when comparing different water content lenses on the basis of the extent of dehydration to do so with respect to a specific clinical consequence rather than in general terms