Fifteen-year incidence rate and risk factors of pterygium in the Southern Indian state of Andhra Pradesh.

PURPOSE: To report 15-year incidence rate and associated risk factors of pterygium among people aged 30 years and above at baseline in the rural clusters of longitudinal Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study (APEDS III). METHODS: The baseline APEDS I included 7771 participants of which 6447 (83%) were traced and 5395 (83.7%) were re-examined in APEDS III. To estimate the incidence of pterygium, we selected participants who were 30 years and above at baseline (4188), of which 2976 were traced and 2627 (88.3%) were examined, and based on inclusion criteria, 2290 participants were included in the study. The incidence rate of pterygium was defined as the proportion of people free of pterygium at baseline who had developed the condition at 15-year follow-up (range 13-17 years). Univariate and multivariable analyses for risk factors were undertaken. RESULTS: The sex-adjusted incidence rate of pterygium was 25.2 per 100 person-years (95% CI 24.8 to 25.7) which was significantly higher for men than women (26.3 per 100 person-years (95% CI 25.6 to 27.0) and 24.7 (95% CI 24.1 to 25.3) respectively). At the multivariable analysis, male gender (RR: 1.35, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.83), no formal education (RR: 2.46, 95% CI 1.22 to 4.93), outdoor occupation (RR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.9) and lower body mass index (BMI) (<18.5) (RR: 1.25, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.55) were associated with increased risk of pterygium. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence rate of pterygium was high in this rural population, especially in men and those engaged in outdoor activities, lack of formal education and with lower BMI. It is likely that greater exposure to ultraviolet light is a major contributing factor, thus warranting preventive strategies

Incidence, Incident Causes, and Risk Factors of Visual Impairment and Blindness in a Rural Population in India: 15-Year Follow-up of the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study.

PURPOSE: To report 15-year incidence rate of visual loss (blindness and visual impairment [VI]), causes, and risk factors for participants in Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study III (APEDS III). DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. METHODS: From 2012 to 2016, all rural participants were interviewed and underwent a comprehensive eye examination, including dilated fundus examination and imaging. Presenting visual acuity (PVA) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured using a standard logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution chart at 3 meters. World Health Organization (WHO) and United States of America (USA) categories of VI and blindness were used. Incident visual loss was defined as the development of or worsening of visual loss of one or more categories. RESULTS: In APEDS I, 7,771 rural participants were examined using stratified, random-cluster systematic sampling; in APEDS III, 5,395 participants (69.4% of rural or 52.4% of total participants) were re-examined. Using WHO categories, the crude incidence rate of any visual loss based on PVA and BCVA were 14.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]:13.6-15.7) and 6.3 (95% CI: 6.1-6.4) per 100 person-years, respectively. Using USA criteria, the values were 22.6 (95% CI: 22.3-23.0) and 10.6 (95% CI: 10.3-10.8) per 100 person-years, respectively. More than 90% of visual loss was attributable to cataract and uncorrected refractive error. Using WHO categories, significant independent risk factors for the incident visual loss were increasing age, female gender, illiteracy, past or current smoker, and current use of alcohol. Using the USA definition, an additional risk factor was lower level of education. CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence likely reflects poor access to eye care in this population, which needs to be taken into account when planning eye care programs

Fifteen-Year Incidence Rate of Primary Angle Closure Disease in the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study.

PURPOSE: To report on the 15-year incidence of primary angle closure disease (PACD) among participants aged ≥40 years in rural southern India DESIGN: Population-based longitudinal incidence rate study METHODS: Setting: 3 rural study centres. STUDY POPULATION: Phakic participants aged ≥40 years who participated in both examination time points. OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: All participants at the baseline and at the mean 15-year follow-up visit underwent a detailed interview, anthropometry, blood pressure measurement, and comprehensive eye examination. Automated perimetry was attempted based on predefined criteria. Main outcome measures included development of any form of PACD, as defined by the International Society for Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology (ISGEO), during the follow-up period in phakic participants, who did not have the disease at baseline. RESULTS: We analyzed data obtained from 1,197 (81.4% out of available 1,470) participants to calculate the incidence of the disease. The mean age (standard deviation) of the study participants at the baseline was 50.2 (8.1) years, with 670 male (45.5%) and 800 female (54.4%) participants. The incidence rate per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval) for primary angle closure suspect, primary angle closure, and primary angle closure glaucoma was 8.8 (8.4, 9.2), 6.2 (5.9, 6.6), and 1.6 (1.4, 1.8), respectively. Thus, the incidence of all forms of PACD was 16.4 (15.9, 17) per 100 person-years. On logistic regression analysis, female gender was a significant risk factor whereas presence of myopia was protective. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports long-term incidence of PACD from rural India. It has implications for eye health care policies, strategies, and planning

Longitudinal Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study: rationale, study design and research methodology.

BACKGROUND: The rationale, objectives, study design and procedures for the longitudinal Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study are described. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study was carried out. PARTICIPANTS: Participants include surviving cohort from the rural component of Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. METHODS: During 1996-2000, Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Survey was conducted in three rural (n = 7771) and one urban (n = 2522) areas (now called Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study 1). In 2009-2010, a feasibility exercise (Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study 2) for a longitudinal study (Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study 3) was undertaken in the rural clusters only, as urban clusters no longer existed. In Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study 3, a detailed interview will be carried out to collect data on sociodemographic factors, ocular and systemic history, risk factors, visual function, knowledge of eye diseases and barriers to accessing services. All participants will also undergo a comprehensive eye examination including photography of lens, optic disc and retina, Optic Coherence Tomography of the posterior segment, anthropometry, blood pressure and frailty measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures include estimates of the incidence of visual impairment and age-related eye disease (lens opacities, glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration) and the progression of eye disease (lens opacities and myopia) and associated risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 7771 respondents examined in rural areas in Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study 1, 5447 (70.1%) participants were traced in Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study 2. These participants will be re-examined. CONCLUSIONS: Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study 3 will provide data on the incidence and progression of visual impairment and major eye diseases and their associated risk factors in India. The study will provide further evidence to aid planning eye care services

Regional variation in the incidence of pseudo-exfoliation in the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study (APEDS).

BACKGROUND: To report the 15-year incidence rate of pseudo-exfoliation (PXF),  PXF glaucoma and regional variation among rural participants in the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study (APEDS) III. METHODS: This population-based longitudinal study was carried out at three rural study sites. Individuals of all ages who participated at baseline with a mean 15-year follow-up visit were included. Detailed Comprehensive ophthalmic examination was performed on all participants. The main outcome measure was development of PXF during the follow-up period in participants who were phakic in one or both eyes without PXF at baseline. RESULTS: Among 5395 participants, 5108 (94.6%) met the inclusion criteria. There were 93 (1.82%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.47-2.22) cases of incident PXF. Their median baseline age (1st, 3rd quartiles) was 51 (44, 59) years and the male: female ratio was 1.3:1. There was no case of incident PXF in participants aged <30 years at baseline. The incidence rate per 100 person years (95% CI) among all ages and those aged ≥30 years at baseline was 1.73 (1.64-1.82) and 3.73 (3.53-3.93), respectively. PXF material was located on iris as well as anterior surface of lens and it was often bilateral. Participants living in two study sites and increasing age were associated with the incidence of PXF. The 15-year incidence of PXF glaucoma (95% CI) in participants ≥30 years of age at baseline was 0.33% (0.14-0.66). CONCLUSION: There is significant regional variation in incidence of PXF in south India which warrants further investigation