Distinct Traits of Structural and Regulatory Evolutional Conservation of Human Genes with Specific Focus on Major Cancer Molecular Pathways

The evolution of protein-coding genes has both structural and regulatory components. The first can be assessed by measuring the ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous nucleotide substitutions. The second component can be measured as the normalized proportion of transposable elements that are used as regulatory elements. For the first time, we characterized in parallel the regulatory and structural evolutionary profiles for 10,890 human genes and 2972 molecular pathways. We observed a ~0.1 correlation between the structural and regulatory metrics at the gene level, which appeared much higher (~0.4) at the pathway level. We deposited the data in the publicly available database RetroSpect. We also analyzed the evolutionary dynamics of six cancer pathways of two major axes: Notch/WNT/Hedgehog and AKT/mTOR/EGFR. The Hedgehog pathway had both components slower, whereas the Akt pathway had clearly accelerated structural evolution. In particular, the major hub nodes Akt and beta-catenin showed both components strongly decreased, whereas two major regulators of Akt TCL1 and CTMP had outstandingly high evolutionary rates. We also noticed structural conservation of serine/threonine kinases and the genes related to guanosine metabolism in cancer signaling: GPCRs, G proteins, and small regulatory GTPases (Src, Rac, Ras); however, this was compensated by the accelerated regulatory evolution

De Novo Variant in the <i>KCNJ9</i> Gene as a Possible Cause of Neonatal Seizures

Background: The reduction in next-generation sequencing (NGS) costs allows for using this method for newborn screening for monogenic diseases (MDs). In this report, we describe a clinical case of a newborn participating in the EXAMEN project (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05325749). Methods: The child presented with convulsive syndrome on the third day of life. Generalized convulsive seizures were accompanied by electroencephalographic patterns corresponding to epileptiform activity. Proband WES expanded to trio sequencing was performed. Results: A differential diagnosis was made between symptomatic (dysmetabolic, structural, infectious) neonatal seizures and benign neonatal seizures. There were no data in favor of the dysmetabolic, structural, or infectious nature of seizures. Molecular karyotyping and whole exome sequencing were not informative. Trio WES revealed a de novo variant in the KCNJ9 gene (1:160087612T > C, p.Phe326Ser, NM_004983), for which, according to the OMIM database, no association with the disease has been described to date. Three-dimensional modeling was used to predict the structure of the KCNJ9 protein using the known structure of its homologs. According to the predictions, Phe326Ser change possibly disrupts the hydrophobic contacts with the valine side chain. Destabilization of the neighboring structures may undermine the formation of GIRK2/GIRK3 tetramers necessary for their proper functioning. Conclusions: We believe that the identified variant may be the cause of the disease in this patient but further studies, including the search for other patients with the KCNJ9 variants, are needed