Low fasting low high-density lipoprotein and postprandial lipemia

BACKGROUND: Low levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and disturbed postprandial lipemia are associated with coronary heart disease. In the present study, we evaluated the variation of triglyceride (TG) postprandially in respect to serum HDL cholesterol levels. RESULTS: Fifty two Greek men were divided into 2 main groups: a) the low HDL group (HDL < 40 mg/dl), and b) the control group. Both groups were further matched according to fasting TG (matched-low HDL, and matched-control groups). The fasting TG concentrations were higher in the low HDL group compared to controls (p = 0.002). The low HDL group had significantly higher TG at 4, 6 and 8 h postprandially compared to the controls (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively). The matched-low HDL group revealed higher TG only at 8 h postprandially (p = 0.017) compared to the matched-control group. ROC analysis showed that fasting TG ≥ 121 mg/dl have 100% sensitivity and 81% specificity for an abnormal TG response (auc = 0.962, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The delayed TG clearance postprandially seems to result in low HDL cholesterol even in subjects with low fasting TG. The fasting TG > 121 mg/dl are predictable for abnormal response to fatty meal

Sex-associated effect of CETP and LPL polymorphisms on postprandial lipids in familial hypercholesterolaemia

Background: This study assessed the gender-specific influence of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (TaqIB, I405V) and lipoprotein lipase (S447X) polymorphisms on the response to an oral fat tolerance test in heterozygotes for familial hypercholesterolaemia.Methods: We selected and genotyped 80 men and postmenopausal women heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolaemia (main group) as well as 11 healthy control subjects. Patients were subgrouped based on their response to oral fat tolerance test. The oral fat tolerance test was defined as pathological when postprandial triglyceride concentration was higher than the highest triglyceride concentration observed in healthy subjects (220 mg/dl) at any time (2, 4, 6 or 8 h).Results: In the pathological subgroup, men had significantly higher incremental area under the curve after oral fat tolerance test than postmenopausal women. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed a gender association of TaqIB and I405V influence on postprandial lipaemia in this subgroup.Conclusion: In conclusion, it seems that gender and TaqIB polymorphism of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene were both associated with the distribution of triglyceride values after oral fat tolerance test, only in subjects with a pathological response to oral fat tolerance test. Specifically, men carrying the B2 allele of the TaqIB polymorphism showed a higher postprandial triglyceride peak and a delayed return to basal values compared with women carrying B2. However, further investigations in larger populations are required to replicate and confirm these findings

Postprandial lipemia in men with metabolic syndrome, hypertensives and healthy subjects

BACKGROUND: The metabolic syndrome (MetS), as well as postprandial hypertriglyceridemia, is associated with coronary heart disease. This study aimed to evaluate the postprandial lipemia after oral fat tolerance test (OFTT) in subjects with MetS and compare them to hypertensive (HTN) and healthy subjects. RESULTS: OFTT was given to 33 men with MetS (defined by the Adult Treatment Panel III), 17 HTN and 14 healthy men. The MetS group was further divided according to fasting triglycerides (TG) into TG ≥ 150 [MetS+TG, (n = 22)] or <150 mg/dl [MetS-TG (n = 11)], and into those with or without hypertension [MetS+HTN (n = 24), MetS-HTN (n = 9), respectively]. TG concentrations were measured before and at 4, 6 and 8 h after OFTT and the postprandial response was quantified using the area under the curve (AUC) for TG. The postprandial response was significantly higher in MetS compared to HTN and healthy men [AUC (SD) in mg/dl/h; 2534 ± 1016 vs. 1620 ± 494 and 1019 ± 280, respectively, p ≤ 0.001]. The TG levels were increased significantly in MetS+TG compared to MetS-TG subjects at 4 (p = 0.022), 6 (p < 0.001) and 8 hours (p < 0.001). The TG were increased significantly in MetS-TG compared to healthy subjects at 4 (p = 0.011), 6 (p = 0.001) and 8 hours (p = 0.015). In linear regression analysis only fasting TG levels were a significant predictor of the AUC (Coefficient B = 8.462, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Fasting TG concentration is the main determinant of postprandial lipemia. However, an exaggeration of TG postprandialy was found in normotriglyceridemic MetS and HTN compared to healthy subjects. This suggests that intervention to lower fasting TG levels should be recommended in MetS subjects

Postprandial metabolic heterogeneity in men with primary dyslipidaemia

A b s t r a c t Introduction: Familial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCH) and familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) have been strongly linked to premature coronary artery disease. Postprandial hypertriglyceridaemia is also associated with atherosclerotic disease. We evaluated the postprandial lipaemia in men with FCH and FH and compared them to a group of healthy men. Material and methods: The study population consisted of 83 men: 34 FCH, 29 FH and 20 healthy. The FCH and FH groups were further divided into five subgroups, according to their lipid phenotype: FCH-IIA (n = 13), FCH-IIB (n = 10), FCH-IV (n = 11), FH-IIA (n = 21) and FH-IIB (n = 8). Postprandial lipaemia was evaluated by the areas under the curve for triglyceride (TG) concentrations (TG-AUC). Results: The TG levels after oral fat tolerance test were significantly higher in FCH, compared to FH and healthy groups (TG-AUC in mg/dl/h; 2678 ±1415 vs. 1503 ±1147 and 1011 ±652 respectively, p &lt; 0.001). The postprandial response was higher in FCH-IV and FCH-IIB, compared to FCH-IIA (TG-AUC in mg/dl/h; 3220 ±824 or 3409 ±770 vs. 1863 ±577 respectively, p &lt; 0.001, for both comparisons). The FCH-IIA group showed higher postprandial TG levels when compared to FH-IIA (TG-AUC in mg/dl/h; 1863 ±577 vs. 1374 ±428 respectively, p = 0.008). There were no significant differences between FH-IIB and FCH-IIB subgroups. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.907, p &lt; 0.001) between the postprandial TG-AUC and fasting TG levels in all FCH subjects. Conclusions: All phenotypes of FCH and the FH IIB phenotype demonstrate an exaggerated postprandial response that could partially contribute to the high cardiovascular risk. These patients should be identified and treated early with the appropriate hypolipidaemic agents