Notch signaling in T cells is essential for allergic airway inflammation, but expression of the Notch ligands Jagged 1 and Jagged 2 on dendritic cells is dispensable

__Background:__ Allergic asthma is characterized by a TH2 response induced by dendritic cells (DCs) that present inhaled allergen. Although the mechanisms by which they instruct TH2 differentiation are still poorly understood, expression of the Notch ligand Jagged on DCs has been implicated in this process. __Objective:__ We sought to establish whether Notch signaling induced by DCs is critical for house dust mite (HDM)-driven allergic airway inflammation (AAI) in vivo. __Methods:__ The induction of Notch ligand expression on DC subsets by HDM was quantified by using quantitative real-time PCR. We used an HDM-driven asthma mouse model to compare the capacity of Jagged 1 and Jagged 2 single- and double-deficient DCs to induce AAI. In addition, we studied AAI in mice with a T cell-specific deletion of recombination signal-binding protein for immunoglobulin Jκ region (RBPJκ), a downstream effector of Notch signaling. __Results:__ HDM exposure promoted expression of Jagged 1, but not Jagged 2, on DCs. In agreement with published findings, in vitro-differentiated and HDM-pulsed Jagged 1 and Jagged 2 double-deficient DCs lacked the capacity to induce AAI. However, after in vivo intranasal sensitization and challenge with HDM, DC-specific Jagged 1 or Jagged 2 single- or double-deficient mice had eosinophilic airway inflammation and a TH2 cell activation phenotype that was not different from that in control littermates. In contrast, RBPJκ-def

Blimp-1 Rather Than Hobit Drives the Formation of Tissue-Resident Memory CD8+ T Cells in the Lungs

Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T (TRM) cells that develop in the epithelia at portals of pathogen entry are important for improved protection against re-infection. CD8+ TRM cells within the skin and the small intestine are long-lived and maintained independently of circulating memory CD8+ T cells. In contrast to CD8+ TRM cells at these sites, CD8+ TRM cells that arise after influenza virus infection within the lungs display high turnover and require constant recruitment from the circulating memory pool for long-term persistence. The distinct characteristics of CD8+ TRM cell maintenance within the lungs may suggest a unique program of transcriptional regulation of influenza-specific CD8+ TRM cells. We have previously demonstrated that the transcription factors Hobit and Blimp-1 are essential for the formation of CD8+ TRM cells across several tissues, including skin, liver, kidneys, and the small intestine. Here, we addressed the roles of Hobit and Blimp-1 in CD8+ TRM cell differentiation in the lungs after influenza infection using mice deficient for these transcription factors. Hobit was not required for the formation of influenza-specific CD8+ TRM cells in the lungs. In contrast, Blimp-1 was essential for the differentiation of lung CD8+ TRM cells and inhibited the differentiation of central memory CD8+ T (TCM) cells. We conclude that Blimp-1 rather than Hobit mediates the formation of CD8+ TRM cells in the lungs, potentially through control of the lineage choice between TCM and TRM cells during the differentiation of influenza-specific CD8+ T cells

Notch in T Cell Differentiation: All Things Considered

Differentiation of naive T cells into effector cells is required for optimal protection against different classes of microbial pathogen and for the development of immune memory. Recent findings have revealed important roles for the Notch signaling pathway in T cell differentiation into all known effector subsets, raising the question of how this pathway controls such diverse differentiation programs. Studies in preclinical models support the therapeutic potential of manipulating the Notch pathway to alleviate immune pathology, highlighting the Importance of understanding the mechanisms through which Notch regulates T cell differentiation and function. We review these findings here, and outline both unifying principles involved in Notch-mediated T cell fate decisions and cell type- and context-specific differences that may present the most suitable points for therapeutic interventio

Decisions on the Road to Memory

A fundamental property of the adaptive immune system is the ability to generate antigen-specific memory, which protects against repeated infections with the same pathogens and determines the success of vaccination. Immune memory is built up alongside a response providing direct protection during the course of a primary immune response. For CD8 T cells, this involves the generation of two distinct types of effector cells. Short lived effector cells (SLECs) confer immediate protection, but contribute little to the memory repertoire. Memory precursor effector cells (MPECs) have the ability to respond to survival signals and develop into memory cells. These two types of cells can be distinguished on the basis of surface markers and express distinct genetic programs. A single naive CD8 T cell can give rise to both MPEC and SLEC daughter cells. This may involve an initial asymmetric division or depend on later instructive signals acting on equipotent daughter cells. Strong inflammatory signals favor the generation of SLECs and weaker inflammation favors the generation of MPECs. A distinguishing feature of MPECs is their ability to persist when most effector cells die. This survival depends on signals from the IL-7 receptor, which induce expression of anti-apoptotic factors. MPECs are therefore characterized by expression of the IL-7 receptor as well as the CCR7 chemokine receptor, which allows homing to areas in lymphoid organs where IL-7 is produced. Critical for persistence of MPECs is further their responsiveness to myeloid cell derived IL-15, which instructs these cells to switch their metabolic programs from glycolysis associated with rapid proliferation to fatty acid oxidation required during a more resting state. As the mechanisms determining generation of immunological memory are unraveled, opportunities will emerge for the improvement of vaccination strategie

The different faces of Notch in T-helper-cell differentiation

Interleukin-12 (IL-12) and IL-4 induce T helper 1 (T(H)1)- and T(H)2-cell differentiation, respectively, in vitro. However, not all T(H)1-cell responses require IL-12 in vivo, and T(H)2-cell responses are remarkably independent of IL-4-receptor signalling, suggesting that other polarizing signals must exist. Accumulating evidence indicates that Notch is a candidate receptor that might mediate these signals. However, contrasting roles for Notch have been proposed: some evidence shows that Notch promotes T(H)1-cell differentiation, whereas other evidence supports a prominent role for Notch in T(H)2-cell differentiation. In this Review, we discuss recent findings that help to reconcile this discrepancy and highlight the accumulating evidence for the role of Notch in T-cell-mediated disease

How are T(H)1 and T(H)2 effector cells made?

Differentiation of T(H)1 and T(H)2 effector cells proceeds through several phases: First, naive CD4(+) precursor cells are instructed to differentiate as appropriate to optimally fight the infectious threat encountered. This process is governed by the IL12 and IL4 cytokines, as well as by signaling through the Notch receptor. In response to these signals, transcription is initiated of lineage specific cytokine genes including the Ifn gamma and 114 genes as well as of genes encoding transcriptional regulators, such as T-bet and Gata3. The respective differentiation programs are reinforced by both positive and negative feedback mechanisms. Furthermore, epigenetic modifications of the lineage specific genes result in the emergence of regulatory elements, which control high level lineage restricted expression by both intrachromosomal and interchromosomal associations. Together, these mechanisms ensure stable inheritance of the differentiated fate in the numerous progeny of the original naive CD4(+) T cell