Re-investigation of functional gastrointestinal disorders utilizing a machine learning approach

Abstract Background Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), as a group of syndromes with no identified structural or pathophysiological biomarkers, are currently classified by Rome criteria based on gastrointestinal symptoms (GI). However, the high overlap among FGIDs in patients makes treatment and identifying underlying mechanisms challenging. Furthermore, disregarding psychological factors in the current classification, despite their approved relationship with GI symptoms, underlines the necessity of more investigation into grouping FGID patients. We aimed to provide more homogenous and well-separated clusters based on both GI and psychological characteristics for patients with FGIDs using an unsupervised machine learning algorithm. Methods Based on a cross-sectional study, 3765 (79%) patients with at least one FGID were included in the current study. In the first step, the clustering utilizing a machine learning algorithm was merely executed based on GI symptoms. In the second step, considering the previous step's results and focusing on the clusters with a diverse combination of GI symptoms, the clustering was re-conducted based on both GI symptoms and psychological factors. Results The first phase clustering of all participants based on GI symptoms resulted in the formation of pure and non-pure clusters. Pure clusters exactly illustrated the properties of most pure Rome syndromes. Re-clustering the members of the non-pure clusters based on GI and psychological factors (i.e., the second clustering step) resulted in eight new clusters, indicating the dominance of multiple factors but well-discriminated from other clusters. The results of the second step especially highlight the impact of psychological factors in grouping FGIDs. Conclusions In the current study, the existence of Rome disorders, which were previously defined by expert opinion-based consensus, was approved, and, eight new clusters with multiple dominant symptoms based on GI and psychological factors were also introduced. The more homogeneous clusters of patients could lead to the design of more precise clinical experiments and further targeted patient care

Association of anxiety, depression, and psychological distress in people with and without functional dyspepsia

Background: Current studies have indicated a high ratio of psychological problems in functional dyspepsia (FD) which causes disturbance in its management, so recognition these problems help the process of treatment. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with a sample size of 4763 carried out in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 2011. Modified ROME III questionnaire was used to evaluate FD symptoms. Hospital anxiety and depression scale and 12-item General Health Questionnaire-12 was used to assess the psychological issue. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association of psychological problems and FD. Results: We showed that overly 654 (13.7%), 1338 (28.1%), and 1067 (22.4%) of participants, respectively had anxiety, depression, and of psychological distress. Seven hundred and ten (15.5%) participants were diagnosed with FD. Of all participants Mean scores of anxiety (P < 0.001), depression (P < 0.001), and psychological distress (P < 0.001) in participants with FD were significantly more than those with no FD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that psychological problems, whether in the form of psychological distress odds ratio (OR): 2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3–3) and OR: 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1–1.7) in males and females, respectively, anxiety OR: 2.4 (95% CI: 1.5–3.9) and OR: 2.3 (95% CI: 1.7–3.2) in males and females, respectively) or depression OR: 2.2 (95% CI: 1.5–3.3) and OR: 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3–2.3) in males and females, respectively) were significantly linked to FD in both genders. Conclusions: The prevalence of FD is less in males than females, but psychological links were stronger in males. Thus, it is essential to consider and detect the psychological distress in these patients

Anxiety, depression and distress among irritable bowel syndrome and their subtypes: An epidemiological population based study

Background: Psychiatric disorders are common in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We conducted this study to investigate the relationship of IBS and their subtypes with some of psychological factors. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed among 4763 staff of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 2011. Modified ROME III questionnaire and Talley Bowel Disease Questionnaire were used to evaluate IBS symptoms. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and 12-item General Health Questionnaire were utilized to assess anxiety, depression and psychological distress. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association of psychological states and IBS in the total subject and both genders. Results: About, 4763 participants with mean age 36/58 ± 8/09 were included the 2106 males and 2657 females. Three thousand and seven hundred and seventy-six (81.2%) and 2650 (57.2%) participants were married and graduated respectively. Subtype analysis of IBS and its relationship with anxiety, depression and distress comparing the two genders can be observed that: IBS and clinically-significant IBS have higher anxiety, depression symptoms, and distress than the subject without IBS (P < 0.001). Women with IBS, have higher scores than men (P < 0.001). Compared to other subtypes, mixed IBS subtype has a higher anxiety, depression, and distress score. Conclusion: A high prevalence of anxiety, depression symptoms and distress in our subjects emphasize the importance of the psychological evaluation of the patients with IBS, in order to better management of the patients and may also help to reduce the burden of health care costs