Preparing for the future of cardiothoracic surgery with virtual reality simulation and surgical planning:a narrative review

Background and Objective: Virtual reality (VR) technology in cardiothoracic surgery has been an area of interest for almost three decades, but computational limitations had restricted its implementation. Recent advances in computing power have facilitated the creation of high-fidelity VR simulations and anatomy visualisation tools. We undertook a non-systematic narrative review of literature on VR simulations and preoperative planning tools in cardiothoracic surgery and present the state-of-the-art, and a future outlook. Methods: A comprehensive search through MEDLINE database was performed in November 2022 for all publications that describe the use of VR in cardiothoracic surgery regarding training purposes, education, simulation, and procedural planning. We excluded papers that were not in English or Dutch, and that used two-dimensional (2D) screens, augmented, and simulated reality. Key Content and Findings: Results were categorised as simulators and preoperative planning tools. Current surgical simulators include the lobectomy module in the LapSim for video assisted thorascopic surgery which has been extensively validated, and the more recent robotic assisted lobectomy simulators from Robotix Mentor and Da Vinci SimNow, which are increasingly becoming integrated into the robotic surgery curriculum. Other perioperative simulators include the CardioPulmonary VR Resuscitation simulator for advanced life support after cardiac surgery, and the VR Extracorporeal Circulation (ECC) simulator for perfusionists to simulate the use of a heart-lung machine (HLM). For surgical planning, there are many small-scale tools available, and many case/pilot studies have been published utilising the visualisation possibilities provided by VR, including congenital cardiac, congenital thoracic, adult cardiac, and adult thoracic diseases. Conclusions: There are many promising tools becoming available to leverage the immersive power of VR in cardiothoracic surgery. The path to validate these simulators is well described, but large-scale trials producing high-level evidence for their efficacy are absent as of yet. Our view is that these tools will become increasingly integral parts of daily practice in this field in the coming decade.</p

Sublobar Pulmonary Resection in Children With Congenital Lung Abnormalities:A Systematic Review

Background:Lobectomy is currently the advised resection for symptomatic congenital lung abnormalities (CLA). Sublobar surgery is suggested as an alternative that enables to conserve healthy lung parenchyma. This systematic review aims to explore the outcomes of sublobar surgery in CLA patients as well as the corresponding surgical terminology and techniques. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in adherence to PRISMA-P guidelines. The target population consists of children undergoing sublobar pulmonary resection for CLA. All studies were independently assessed by two reviewers, and evaluated by a third reviewer in case of disagreement. Results: The literature search yielded 901 studies of which 18 studies were included, comprising 1167 cases. The median chest tube insertion duration was 3.6 days (range 2.0–6.9 days), the median hospital admission was 4.9 days (range 2.0–14.5 days), and residual disease was diagnosed in 2% – leading to re-operation in 70%. The median incidence of postoperative complications was 15% (range 0–67%). Follow-up imaging was standard-of-care in 2/3 of studies. Due to the absence of standardised terminology, operative details and specification of resection type did not typically relate between studies. Conclusions: Sublobar resection of CLA lesions could be a viable alternative to lobectomy in certain cases, with the advantage of conserving healthy lung parenchyma. Peri- and postoperative complications are comparable with those reported for conventional lobectomy. The incidence of residual disease following sublobar surgery appears to be lower than commonly stated. To improve comparability between studies, we recommend reporting perioperative characteristics in a structured format. Level of evidence: Level IV.</p

An unusual case of redo tricuspid valve replacement and repair of a previously unidentified anomalous pulmonary venous return in a patient with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries

Associated cardiovascular malformations in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (CCTGA) should not be missed when a patient requires surgical correction. We present a case of an adult CCTGA patient who required redo surgery for recurrent tricuspid (left atrioventricular) valve regurgitation and previously unidentified partial anomalous pulmonary venous return

Virtual Reality for Pain and Anxiety Management in Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology

Pain and anxiety are common in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and percutaneous cardiac interventions. Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging non-pharmacological tool for pain and anxiety management. However, its application around cardiac procedures remains relatively unexplored. In this review, we perform a targeted non-systematic literature review to assess the current state-of-the-art of VR for pain and anxiety management in patients undergoing cardiac procedures. Contexts of interest were preprocedural, periprocedural, and postprocedural applications. Existing trials show inconsistent results. The majority of studies in the preprocedural (7 studies, n = 302), periprocedural (1 study, n = 99), and postprocedural stage (4 studies, n = 214) demonstrate significant reduction of pain and anxiety through VR distraction therapy or VR patient education. However, larger-scale trials (2 preprocedural studies [n = 233], 1 periprocedural study [n = 32], 2 postprocedural studies [n = 300]) report no effect. Current literature on effectiveness of VR for pain and anxiety management in cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology remains inconclusive.</p

Virtual Reality for Pain and Anxiety Management in Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology

Pain and anxiety are common in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and percutaneous cardiac interventions. Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging non-pharmacological tool for pain and anxiety management. However, its application around cardiac procedures remains relatively unexplored. In this review, we perform a targeted non-systematic literature review to assess the current state-of-the-art of VR for pain and anxiety management in patients undergoing cardiac procedures. Contexts of interest were preprocedural, periprocedural, and postprocedural applications. Existing trials show inconsistent results. The majority of studies in the preprocedural (7 studies, n = 302), periprocedural (1 study, n = 99), and postprocedural stage (4 studies, n = 214) demonstrate significant reduction of pain and anxiety through VR distraction therapy or VR patient education. However, larger-scale trials (2 preprocedural studies [n = 233], 1 periprocedural study [n = 32], 2 postprocedural studies [n = 300]) report no effect. Current literature on effectiveness of VR for pain and anxiety management in cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology remains inconclusive.</p

Optimized Preoperative Planning of Double Outlet Right Ventricle Patients by 3D Printing and Virtual Reality:A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES: In complex double outlet right ventricle (DORV) patients, the optimal surgical approach may be difficult to assess based on conventional two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The aim of this study is to assess the added value of 3D printed and 3D Virtual Reality (VR) models of the heart used for surgical planning in DORV patients, supplementary to the gold standard 2D imaging modalities.METHODS: Five patients with different DORV-subtypes and high-quality CT scans were selected retrospectively. 3D prints and 3D-VR models were created. Twelve congenital cardiac surgeons and paediatric cardiologists, from three different hospitals, were shown 2D-CT first, after which they assessed the 3D print and 3D-VR models in random order. After each imaging method, a questionnaire was filled in on the visibility of essential structures and the surgical plan.RESULTS: Spatial relationships were generally better visualized using 3D methods (3D printing/3D-VR) than in 2D. The feasibility of VSD patch closure could be determined best using 3D-VR reconstructions (3D-VR 92%, 3D print 66%, and US/CT 46%, P &lt; 0.01). The percentage of proposed surgical plans corresponding to the performed surgical approach was 66% for plans based on US/CT, 78% for plans based on 3D printing, and 80% for plans based on 3D-VR visualization.CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that both 3D printing and 3D-VR have additional value for cardiac surgeons and cardiologists over 2D imaging, because of better visualization of spatial relationships. As a result, the proposed surgical plans based on the 3D visualizations matched the actual performed surgery to a greater extent.</p