14 research outputs found
Die Expression von Hugl-1 während der Adenom-Karzinom-Sequenz und bei chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen
Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for high-risk patients.
BACKGROUND
Morbidly obese patients with excessive concomitant disease carry a significantly increased perioperative risk. Although they may benefit most from a bariatric intervention, they are often denied surgery. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), as it is less complication-prone than other bariatric procedures, suits the needs of those patients.
OBJECTIVE
To review the short-term outcome of LSG for high-risk patients SETTING: University hospital, Switzerland.
METHODS
A total of 110 patients with high perioperative risk undergoing LSG between January 2008 and December 2014 were prospectively recorded. Patients were defined as "high-risk" if they met 2 of the following criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score (ASA)>III, Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS)≥4, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) class IV, Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Severity Index (OSA-SI)≥5, renal insufficiency chronic kidney disease ≥3, liver cirrhosis, or history of life-threatening perioperative events.
RESULTS
Of the patients, 59 (54%) were male. Median age was 49 years (range: 18-69), and median BMI was 51.7 kg/m(2) (38.7-89.2). Median operating time was 65 minutes (27-260). Eighty-six patients (78%) were classified as ASA IV, 65 (59%) as RCRI class IV, 51 (46%) as OS-MRS≥4 and 63 (57%) as OSA-SI≥5. Eighty-nine (81%) had type 2 diabetes, 70 (64%) were under antiplatelet and or anticoagulant therapy. Four patients (4%) were converted to open. Length of stay was 5 days (1-70). Major complications occurred in 12 patients (11%), including 1 mortality (1%).
CONCLUSION
"High-risk"-patients identified using a combination of established obesity- and co-morbidity-related risk scores profit from LSG as part of a uniform treatment pathway. Given the severity of co-morbidities, LSG can be performed safely. (Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;X:XXX-XXX.) © 2016 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved
Electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter to treat astroesophageal reflux disease: Technique of implantation
Objective: Electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to treat gastroesophageal
reflux disease (GERD) leads to a normalization of esophageal pH and enhanced LES pressure. It effectively
improves symptoms of GERD without the typical side effects of traditional antireflux-surgery.
Methods: Illustrated by the cases of a 54-year-old female patient with worsening GERD despite maximized
acid suppression therapy and of a 47-year-old male patient with GERD after sleeve gastrectomy,
crucial points of implantation and perioperative minutiae are shown in this video.
Results: The usual patient placement and trocar positioning for laparoscopic antireflux surgery is
used. After identification and exposure of the anterior gastroesophageal junction, the electrodes are
sewn into the esophageal wall. Extraluminal placement is secured with endoscopy. The lead electrical
connector is then pulled through the abdominal wall and attached to the pulse generator. After a first
functionality test, the generator is placed in a subcutaneous pocket. A final functionality test is followed
by initiation of treatment.
Conclusion: This standardized technique for the implantation of an electrical LES-stimulation-device
using easily reproducible steps leads to a good peri- and postoperative outcome and is the foundation
for the long-term efficacy of this method
Complex Hernias with Loss of Domain in Morbidly Obese Patients: Role of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Multi-Step Approach
Morbid obesity and its associated comorbidities are risk factors for the development of abdominal hernias, add complexity to their repair, and increase the perioperative risk. The repair of hernias with loss of domain (LoD) is further complicated by the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). A staged concept with an initial weight loss procedure might enable a reposition of the herniated viscera, improve comorbidities for and prohibit ACS in the subsequent repair
[18F]fluoro-ethylcholine-PET Plus 4D-CT (FEC-PET-CT): A Break-Through Tool to Localize the “Negative” Parathyroid Adenoma. One Year Follow Up Results Involving 170 Patients
Background: The diagnostic performance of [18F]fluoro-ethylcholine-PET-CT&4D-CT (FEC-PET&4D-CT) to identify parathyroid adenomas (PA) was analyzed when ultrasound (US) or MIBI-Scan (MS) failed to localize. Postsurgical one year follow-up data are presented. Methods: Patients in whom US and MS delivered either incongruent or entirely negative findings were subjected to FEC-PET&4D-CT and cases from July 2017 to June 2020 were analyzed, retrospectively. Cervical exploration with intraoperative PTH-monitoring (IO-PTH) was performed. Imaging results were correlated to intraoperative findings, and short term and one year postoperative follow-up data. Results: From July 2017 to June 2020 in 171 FEC-PET&4D-CTs 159 (92.9%) PAs were suggested. 147 patients already had surgery, FEC-PET&4D-CT accurately localized in 141; false neg. 4, false pos. 2, global sensitivity 0.97; accuracy 0.96, PPV 0.99. All of the 117 patients that already have completed their 12-month postoperative follow up had normal biochemical parameter, i.e., no signs of persisting disease. However, two cases may have a potential for recurrent disease, for a cure rate of at least 98.3%. Conclusion: FEC-PET&4D-CT shows unprecedented results regarding the accuracy localizing PAs. The one-year-follow-up data demonstrate a high cure rate. We, therefore, suggest FEC-PET-CT as the relevant diagnostic tool for the localization of PAs when US fails to localize PA, especially after previous surgery to the neck
C-Reactive protein on postoperative day one: a significant predictive marker for early deep surgical side infections after elective bariatric surgery
Neuromonitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve reduces the rate of bilateral vocal cord dysfunction in planned bilateral thyroid procedures
Purpose: Bilateral vocal cord dysfunction (bVCD) is a rare but feared complication of thyroid surgery. This long term retrospective study determined the effect of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) during thyroid surgeries with regard to the rate of bVCD and evaluated the frequency as well as the outcome of staged operations. Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively documented data (2000–2019) of a tertiary referral centers’ database. IONM started in 2000 and, since 2010, discontinuation of surgery was encouraged in planned bilateral surgeries to prevent bVCD, if non-transient loss of signal (ntLOS) occurred on the first side. Datasets of the most recent 40-month-period were assessed in detail to determine the clinical outcome of unilateral ntLOS in planned bilateral thyroid procedures. Results: Of 22,573 patients, 65 had bVCD (0.288%). The rate of bVCD decreased from 0.44 prior to 2010 to 0.09% after 2010 (p < 0.001, Chi2). Case reviews of the most recent 40 months period identified ntLOS in 113/3115 patients (3.6%, 2.2% NAR), of which 40 ntLOS were recorded during a planned bilateral procedure (n = 952, 2.1% NAR). Of 21 ntLOS occurring on the first side of the bilateral procedure, 15 procedures were stopped, subtotal contralateral resections were performed, and thyroidectomy was continued in 3 patients respectively, with the use of continuous vagal IONM. Eighteen cases of VCD were documented postop, and all but one patient had a full recovery. Seven patients had staged resections after 1 to 18 months (median 4) after the first procedure. Conclusion: IONM facilitates reduced postoperative bVCD rates. IONM is, therefore, recommendable in planned bilateral procedures. The rate of non-complete bilateral surgery after intraoperative non-transient LOS was 2%
Complex hernias with loss of domain in morbidly obese patients: role of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a multi-step approach
Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules (THYCOVID): a retrospective, international, multicentre, cross-sectional study.
Since its outbreak in early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has diverted resources from non-urgent and elective procedures, leading to diagnosis and treatment delays, with an increased number of neoplasms at advanced stages worldwide. The aims of this study were to quantify the reduction in surgical activity for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the COVID-19 pandemic; and to evaluate whether delays in surgery led to an increased occurrence of aggressive tumours. In this retrospective, international, cross-sectional study, centres were invited to participate in June 22, 2022; each centre joining the study was asked to provide data from medical records on all surgical thyroidectomies consecutively performed from Jan 1, 2019, to Dec 31, 2021. Patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules were divided into three groups according to when they underwent surgery: from Jan 1, 2019, to Feb 29, 2020 (global prepandemic phase), from March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2021 (pandemic escalation phase), and from June 1 to Dec 31, 2021 (pandemic decrease phase). The main outcomes were, for each phase, the number of surgeries for indeterminate thyroid nodules, and in patients with a postoperative diagnosis of thyroid cancers, the occurrence of tumours larger than 10 mm, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastases, vascular invasion, distant metastases, and tumours at high risk of structural disease recurrence. Univariate analysis was used to compare the probability of aggressive thyroid features between the first and third study phases. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05178186. Data from 157 centres (n=49 countries) on 87 467 patients who underwent surgery for benign and malignant thyroid disease were collected, of whom 22 974 patients (18 052 [78·6%] female patients and 4922 [21·4%] male patients) received surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules. We observed a significant reduction in surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the pandemic escalation phase (median monthly surgeries per centre, 1·4 [IQR 0·6-3·4]) compared with the prepandemic phase (2·0 [0·9-3·7]; p<0·0001) and pandemic decrease phase (2·3 [1·0-5·0]; p<0·0001). Compared with the prepandemic phase, in the pandemic decrease phase we observed an increased occurrence of thyroid tumours larger than 10 mm (2554 [69·0%] of 3704 vs 1515 [71·5%] of 2119; OR 1·1 [95% CI 1·0-1·3]; p=0·042), lymph node metastases (343 [9·3%] vs 264 [12·5%]; OR 1·4 [1·2-1·7]; p=0·0001), and tumours at high risk of structural disease recurrence (203 [5·7%] of 3584 vs 155 [7·7%] of 2006; OR 1·4 [1·1-1·7]; p=0·0039). Our study suggests that the reduction in surgical activity for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the COVID-19 pandemic period could have led to an increased occurrence of aggressive thyroid tumours. However, other compelling hypotheses, including increased selection of patients with aggressive malignancies during this period, should be considered. We suggest that surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules should no longer be postponed even in future instances of pandemic escalation. None