Non-operative Management of an Isolated Blunt Traumatic Retrohepatic Inferior Vena Cava Injury

Traumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries are often fatal. Blunt IVC injuries are encountered less often. Conservative management, albeit an option, is not often discussed in the literature. This report explores the non-operative management of a 52-year-old female unrestrained driver who presented with a blunt retrohepatic IVC injury identified on a computed tomography (CT) scan that revealed IVC disruption with extravasation of contrast. Here, we discuss the nonoperative management of the patient and review the literature concerning IVC anatomy, traumatic injuries, and management. We conclude that a hemodynamically stable patient with an isolated blunt traumatic IVC injury can be managed non-operatively. Keywords: blunt abdominal trauma; blunt trauma; hepatic trauma; inferior vena cava injury; non-operative management; traumatic inferior vena cava injury

Management of the most severely injured spleen: a multicenter study of the Research Consortium of New England Centers for Trauma (ReCONECT)

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and predictors of failure of nonoperative management (NOM) in grade IV and V blunt splenic injuries (BSI). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Fourteen trauma centers in New England. PATIENTS: A total of 388 adult patients with a grade IV or V BSI who were admitted between January 1, 2001, and August 31, 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure of NOM (f-NOM). RESULTS: A total of 164 patients (42%) were operated on immediately. Of the remaining 224 who were offered a trial of NOM, the treatment failed in 85 patients (38%). At the end, 64% of patients required surgery. Multivariate analysis identified 2 independent predictors of f-NOM: grade V BSI and the presence of a brain injury. The likelihood of f-NOM was 32% if no predictor was present, 56% if 1 was present, and 100% if both were present. The mortality of patients for whom NOM failed was almost 7-fold higher than those with successful NOM (4.7% vs 0.7%; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly two-thirds of patients with grade IV or V BSI require surgery. A grade V BSI and brain injury predict failure of NOM. This data must be taken into account when generalizations are made about the overall high success rates of NOM, which do not represent severe BSI

Selective Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Gunshot Wounds from Heresy to Adoption: A Multicenter Study of the Research Consortium of New England Centers for Trauma (ReCoNECT)

BACKGROUND: Selective nonoperative management (SNOM) of abdominal gunshot wounds is being practiced in certain trauma centers, but its broader acceptance in the surgical community is unknown. We hypothesized that SNOM has been adopted in New England as an acceptable method of abdominal gunshot wound management. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed the medical records of abdominal gunshot wound patients admitted from January 1996 to June 2015, in 10 New England Level I and II trauma centers. Outcomes included the incidence, success, and failure of SNOM, and morbidity and mortality related to SNOM. RESULTS: Of 922 patients, 707 (77%) received immediate laparotomy (IMMLAP) and 215 (23%) were managed by SNOM. Compared with IMMLAP patients, those with SNOM had a lower median Injury Severity Score (16 vs 8; p \u3c 0.001), lower incidence of complications (34.7% vs 8.5%; p \u3c 0.001) and mortality (5.2% vs 0.5%; p = 0.002), and shorter ICU and hospital stays (median days 1 of 8 vs 0 of 2, respectively; p \u3c 0.001). One SNOM patient died after 3 days due to a gunshot wound to the head. The overall incidence of SNOM increased from 18% before 2010 to 27% in the following years (p = 0.001). Eighteen patients (8.4%) had unsuccessful SNOM and underwent delayed laparotomy at an average of 12.5 hours (range 141 minutes to 48 hours) after arrival. Nine of them (4.2%) experienced complications that were not directly related to the delayed laparotomy, and none died. The rate of nontherapeutic laparotomies was 14.7% among IMMLAP and 5.5% among delayed laparotomy patients (p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Selective nonoperative management of abdominal gunshot wounds, despite being a heresy only a few years ago, has now been established as an acceptable method of management in Level I and II trauma centers in New England

A Western Massachusetts hospital system\u27s response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective: The objective of this paper was to outline a novel model created for the management of the critical care surge due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a Western Massachusetts hospital. Setting: This model was created and implemented at a Western Massachusetts Level 1 Trauma and tertiary referral center. Conclusions: This article outlines a model devised by an interdisciplinary team for rapid expansion of critical care services by increasing allocated space, staffing, and supplies via modifications of existing systems of care to accommodate a predicted large critical care patient surge due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We predict that this model can be utilized and adapted for future critical care surges in times of similar pandemic situations

Retroperitoneal Necrosis as a Rare Complication After Celiac Plexus Block

Long after surgical treatment, chronic pain continues to afflict many patients with pancreatic cancer. Multimodal pain management is the current approach to managing these complex patients. In patients with refractory pain, a celiac plexus block is a commonly used adjunct to optimize pain control. The sclerosing agents used in a celiac plexus block are known to cause local tissue necrosis as a rare complication. We present a case of extensive retroperitoneal necrosis following celiac plexus neurolysis. To our knowledge, this is the first report of extensive retroperitoneal necrosis after a celiac plexus block requiring operative management. Keywords: celiac block; complications; pain management

Impact of Telemedicine on Extended Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma Performance and Workload by Critical Care Transport Personnel

Introduction: There are currently no reports on whether telementoring for extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST) improves critical care transport providers\u27 performance in prehospital settings. Our objective was to determine the impact of teleguidance on eFAST performance and quantify workload experience. Methods: Eight trauma injury modules were selected on simulated patients. Critical care transport (CCT) providers were tasked to complete one independent and one emergency physician-telementored eFAST. The time to completion and the percent of correct findings were obtained. Participants completed the NASA Task Load Index after each iteration to assess workload. Results: Eight independent and 8 telementored eFASTs were completed. The mean times to complete the independent and telementored eFAST were 5 minutes 16 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI], 3 minutes 32 seconds, 6 minutes 59 seconds) and 8 minutes 27 seconds (95% CI, 5 minutes 14 seconds, 11 minutes 39 seconds), respectively (P = .06). The percentage of correctly identified injuries for the independent versus the teleguided eFAST was 65% versus 92.5% (P = .01). The CCT providers experienced higher mental (P = .004), temporal (P = .01), and effort (P = .004) demands; greater frustration (P = .001); and subjective lower performance (P = .003) during independent trials. The emergency physician experienced higher mental (P = .001), temporal (P = .02), effort (P = .005), and frustration (P = .001) demands than the CCT members. Conclusion: The teleguided eFAST yielded higher accuracy than the independent eFAST. The CCT providers relied on teleguidance of the remote physician when performing the eFAST. Teleguidance may improve the accuracy of ultrasounds performed by prehospital personnel in real-life scenarios

Optimal Timing of Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed less than 72 hours from hospital admission for acute cholecystitis has shown to decrease hospital cost without an increase in length of stay (LOS). Very few studies have examined clinical and cost outcomes of performing cholecystectomy less than 24 hours from hospital admission. The aim of this study was to examine the cost and LOS of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed on an early (less than 24 hours from admission) and late (more than 24 hours from hospital admission) basis. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study of 569 patients at Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA, who underwent urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between January 1, 2018 and February 28, 2020. We evaluated preoperative/postoperative LOS, operative duration, hospital cost, and patient complications. Results 468 patients underwent urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis during our study period. Early cholecystectomy (less than 24 hours from admission) had an overall decreased LOS (43.6 hours versus 102.9 hours, p-value \u3c 0.01) and decreased hospital cost ($23,736.70 versus$30,176.40, p-value \u3c 0.01) compared to late cholecystectomy (more than 24 hours from admission). There was also a significantly higher rate of bile leak in patients who underwent surgery more than 24 hours from hospital admission compared to those who had surgery less than 24 hours from admission (5.9% versus 0.4%, p-value \u3c 0.01). Additionally, those procedures performed greater than 24 hours from hospital admission were significantly more likely to be converted to an open procedure (6.9% versus 2.2%, p-value = 0.02). Conclusion Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 24 hours of hospital admission for acute cholecystitis decreased hospital cost, LOS, and operative complications in our institution\u27s patient population. Our data suggests that performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 hours of hospital admission would be beneficial from a patient and hospital standpoint. Keywords: acute calculus cholecystitis; bile leak; biliary diseases; cholecystitis; cost; early laparoscopic cholecystectomy; gallbladder; laporoscopic cholecystectomy; length of stay; post operative complications