6 research outputs found

    The summary of the fixed effects of the final model taking reaction-time as dependent variable (N = 5691; log-likelihood = -39621).

    Full text link
    <p>Note: Random effect for subject intercept had SD of 148.7. SE: standard error of mean; df: degrees of freedom.</p><p>The summary of the fixed effects of the final model taking reaction-time as dependent variable (N = 5691; log-likelihood = -39621).</p

    The summary of the fixed effects of the final model taking confidence rating as dependent variable (N = 7787; log-likelihood = 35888).

    Full text link
    <p>Note: Random effect for subject intercept had SD of 12.49. SE: standard error of mean; df: degrees of freedom.</p><p>The summary of the fixed effects of the final model taking confidence rating as dependent variable (N = 7787; log-likelihood = 35888).</p

    The summary of the fixed effects of the final model taking accuracy as dependent variable (N = 8448; log-likelihood = -5269.6).

    Full text link
    <p>Note: Random effect for subject intercept had SD of 0.16. SE: standard error of mean.</p><p>The summary of the fixed effects of the final model taking accuracy as dependent variable (N = 8448; log-likelihood = -5269.6).</p

    D’ values were significantly and marginally higher for the temporal and parietal groups respectively, compared with the sham stimulation group.

    Full text link
    <p>D’ value is zero at random choice. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Asterisk indicates significant differences; the plus sign indicates marginally significant differences.</p
    corecore