Impact of End Stage Renal Disease on the Clinical Outcomes Of Diabetics Admitted for Heart Failure: Analysis of National Inpatient Sample

Introduction: Patients with diabetes and heart failure (HF) can have varying outcomes depending on whether they also have End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with diabetes and HF with and without ESRD. Methods: Data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016-2018 was analyzed to find hospitalizations for patients with HF as the main diagnosis and diabetes as a secondary diagnosis, with and without ESRD. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding factors. Results: In the total cohort of 12215 patients with a principal diagnosis of heart failure and secondary diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, the in-hospital mortality rate was 2.5%. Patients with ESRD had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (1.37x) compared to those without ESRD. The mean difference in length of stay was higher for patients with ESRD (0.49 days) and in total hospital charges (13360 US$). Patients with ESRD had higher odds of developing acute pulmonary edema, cardiac arrest, and requiring endotracheal intubation. However, they had lower odds of developing cardiogenic shock or requiring an intra-aortic balloon pump insertion. Conclusion: The results suggest that ESRD leads to higher in-patient mortality, length of stay, and total hospital charges for patients with diabetes admitted for HF. The lower incidence of cardiogenic shock and intra-aortic balloon pump insertion in patients with ESRD may be due to timely dialysis

Utilization and Short-term Outcomes of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Cancer

Background Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has been rapidly evolving since FDA’s approval in 2015 and has become more of a same-day-discharge procedure. Cancer patient with atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) population can benefit from the procedure but the in-hospital outcomes and readmission data were rarely studied. Objectives We investigated the utilization, in-hospital and readmission outcomes in cancer patients with AF who underwent LAAO. Methods Data were derived from the National Inpatient Sample and National Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2019. Patients with primary diagnosis of AF admitted for LAAO (ICD-10 code 02L73DK) were grouped by cancer as a secondary diagnosis. We assessed in-hospital mortality, length of stay, total hospital charges, and complications. Thirty-day readmission rates were compared. Results LAAO was performed in 60,380 patients with AF and 3% were cancer patients. There were no differences in in-hospital mortality and total hospital charges; however, cancer patients tended to have longer hospital stay (1.59 ± 0.11 vs. 1.32 ± 0.02, p = 0.013). Among complications, cancer patients had higher rates in open or percutaneous pericardial drainage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19–4.76) and major bleeding events (aOR 7.07; 95% CI 1.82–27.38). There was no statistical significance of 30-day readmission rates between patients with and without cancer (10.0% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.34). The most common readmission reason in cancer patients was gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions LAAO is a promising procedure in cancer patients complicated by AF with contraindication to anticoagulation. Readmission rate is comparable between patients with and without cancer