217 research outputs found

    MLGPA News (Winter 2002)

    Get PDF
    https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/mlgpa_news/1046/thumbnail.jp

    MLGPA News (Spring 2003)

    Get PDF
    https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/mlgpa_news/1047/thumbnail.jp

    MLGPA News (Winter 2003)

    Get PDF
    https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/mlgpa_news/1049/thumbnail.jp

    MLGPA News (Spring 2004)

    Get PDF
    https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/mlgpa_news/1050/thumbnail.jp

    MLGPA News (Fall 2002)

    Get PDF
    https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/mlgpa_news/1045/thumbnail.jp

    MLGPA News (Fall 2003)

    Get PDF
    https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/mlgpa_news/1048/thumbnail.jp

    Equality News (Fall 2004)

    Get PDF
    https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/equality_news/1001/thumbnail.jp

    Equality News (Summer 2004)

    Get PDF
    https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/equality_news/1000/thumbnail.jp

    Virtual patient design : exploring what works and why : a grounded theory study

    Get PDF
    Objectives: Virtual patients (VPs) are online representations of clinical cases used in medical education. Widely adopted, they are well placed to teach clinical reasoning skills. International technology standards mean VPs can be created, shared and repurposed between institutions. A systematic review has highlighted the lack of evidence to support which of the numerous VP designs may be effective, and why. We set out to research the influence of VP design on medical undergraduates. Methods: This is a grounded theory study into the influence of VP design on undergraduate medical students. Following a review of the literature and publicly available VP cases, we identified important design properties. We integrated them into two substantial VPs produced for this research. Using purposeful iterative sampling, 46 medical undergraduates were recruited to participate in six focus groups. Participants completed both VPs, an evaluation and a 1-hour focus group discussion. These were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using grounded theory, supported by computer-assisted analysis. Following open, axial and selective coding, we produced a theoretical model describing how students learn from VPs. Results: We identified a central core phenomenon designated ‘learning from the VP’. This had four categories: VP Construction; External Preconditions; Student–VP Interaction, and Consequences. From these, we constructed a three-layer model describing the interactions of students with VPs. The inner layer consists of the student's cognitive and behavioural preconditions prior to sitting a case. The middle layer considers the VP as an ‘encoded object’, an e-learning artefact and as a ‘constructed activity’, with associated pedagogic and organisational elements. The outer layer describes cognitive and behavioural change. Conclusions: This is the first grounded theory study to explore VP design. This original research has produced a model which enhances understanding of how and why the delivery and design of VPs influence learning. The model may be of practical use to authors, institutions and researchers

    Design, validation and dissemination of an undergraduate assessment tool using SimMan® in simulated medical emergencies

    Get PDF
    Background: Increasingly, medical students are being taught acute medicine using whole-body simulator manikins. Aim: We aimed to design, validate and make widely available two simple assessment tools to be used with Laerdal SimMan (R) for final year students. Methods: We designed two scenarios with criterion-based checklists focused on assessment and management of two medical emergencies. Members of faculty critiqued the assessments for face validity and checklists revised. We assessed three groups of different experience levels: Foundation Year 2 doctors, third and final year medical students. Differences between groups were analysed, and internal consistency and interrater reliability calculated. A generalisability analysis was conducted using scenario and rater as facets in design. Results: A maximum of two items were removed from either checklist following the initial survey. Significantly different scores for three groups of experience for both scenarios were reported (p0.90). Internal consistency was poor (alpha<50.5). Generalizability study results suggest that four cases would provide reliable discrimination between final year students. Conclusions: These assessments proved easy to administer and we have gone some way to demonstrating construct validity and reliability. We have made the material available on a simulator website to enable others to reproduce these assessments
    corecore