Research priorities relating to the debate on assisted dying: what do we still need to know? : Results of a modified Delphi technique

Objective To identify the main areas of uncertainty and subsequent research priorities to inform the ongoing debate around assisted dying. Design Two-round electronic modified Delphi consultation with experts and interested bodies. Setting and participants 110 groups and individuals interested in the subject of end of life care and/or assisted dying were approached to participate. Respondents included health and social care professionals, researchers, campaigners, patients, and carers predominately based in the UK. In the first round, the respondents were asked to propose high-priority research questions related to the topic of assisted dying. The collected research questions were then de-duplicated and presented to all respondents in a second round in which they could rate each question in terms of importance. Results 24% and 26% of participants responded to the first and second rounds respectively. Respondents suggested 85 unique research questions in the first round. These were grouped by theme and rated in terms of importance in the second round. Emergent themes were: Palliative care/symptom control; patient characteristics, experiences and decisions; families and carers; society and the general public; arguments for and against assisted dying; international experiences /analysis of existing national data; suicide; mental health, psychological and psychosocial considerations; comorbidities; the role of clinicians; environment and external influences; broader topics incorporating assisted dying; and moral, ethical and legal issues. Ten of the 85 proposed questions were rated as being important (≥7/10) by at least 50% of respondents. Conclusions Research questions with the highest levels of consensus were predominately concerned with understanding how and why people make end-of-life decisions, and which factors influence those decisions. Dissemination of these findings alongside a focused examination of the existing literature may be the most effective way to add evidence to the ongoing debate around assisted dying

Workplace-based interventions to promote healthy lifestyles in the NHS workforce : a rapid scoping and evidence map

Background:The health and well-being of staff working in the NHS is a significant issue for UK health care. We sought to identify research relevant to the promotion of healthy lifestyles among NHS staff on behalf of NHS England. Objectives:To map existing reviews on workplace-based interventions to promote health and well-being, and to assess the scope for further evidence synthesis work. Design:Rapid and responsive scoping search and evidence map. Participants:Adult employees in any occupational setting and in any role. Interventions:Any intervention aimed at promoting or maintaining physical or mental health and well-being. Early intervention initiatives and those addressing violence against staff, workplace bullying or harassment were also included. Main outcome measures:Any outcome related to the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness or implementation of interventions.Data sources:A scoping search of nine databases was conducted to identify systematic reviews on health and well-being at work. Searches were limited by publication date (2000 to January/February 2019). Review methods:The titles and abstracts of over 8241 records were screened and a total of 408 potentially relevant publications were identified. Information on key characteristics were extracted from the titles and abstracts of all potentially relevant publications. Descriptive statistics (counts and percentages) for key characteristics were generated and data from reviews and ‘reviews of reviews’ were used to produce the evidence map. Results:Evidence related to a broad range of physical and mental health issues was identified across 12 ‘reviews of reviews’ and 312 other reviews, including 16 Cochrane reviews. There also exists National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance addressing multiple issues of potential relevance. A large number of reviews focused on mental health, changing lifestyle behaviour, such as physical activity, or on general workplace health/health promotion. Most of the reviews that focused only on health-care staff addressed mental health issues, and stress/burnout in particular. Limitations:The scoping search process was extensive and clearly effective at identifying relevant publications, but the strategy used may not have identified every potentially relevant review. Owing to the large number of potentially relevant reviews identified from the scoping search, it was necessary to produce the evidence map using information from the titles and abstracts of reviews only. Conclusions: It is doubtful that further evidence synthesis work at this stage would generate substantial new knowledge, particularly within the context of the NHS Health and Wellbeing Framework published in 2018. Additional synthesis work may be useful if it addressed an identifiable need and it was possible to identify one of the following: (1) a specific and focused research question arising from the current evidence map; it may then be appropriate to focus on a smaller number of reviews only, and provide a more thorough and critical assessment of the available evidence; and (2) a specific gap in the literature (i.e. an issue not already addressed by existing reviews or guidance); it may then be possible to undertake further literature searching and conduct a new evidence review

Informing NHS policy in 'digital-first primary care': a rapid evidence synthesis

Background In ‘digital-first primary care’ models of health-care delivery, a patient’s first point of contact with a general practitioner or other health professional is through a digital channel, rather than a face-to-face consultation. Patients are able to access advice and treatment remotely from their home or workplace via a number of different technologies. Objectives This rapid responsive evidence synthesis was undertaken to inform NHS England policy in ‘digital-first primary care’. It was conducted in two stages: (1) scoping the published evidence and (2) addressing a refined set of questions produced by NHS England from the evidence retrieved during the scoping stage. Data sources Searches were conducted of five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, the Health Technology Assessment database and PROSPERO were searched in July 2018) and relevant research/policy and government websites, as well as the National Institute for Health Research Health Service and Delivery Research programme database of ongoing and completed projects. No date or geographical limitations were applied. Review methods After examining the initial scoping material, NHS England provided a list of questions relating to the potential effects of digital modes and models of engagement, and the contracting and integration of these models into primary care. Systematic reviews and evidence syntheses, including evidence on the use of digital (online) modes and models of engagement between patients and primary care, were examined more closely, as was ongoing research and any incidentally identified primary studies focused on the use of digital (online) modes and models of engagement. All records were screened by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus or consulting a third reviewer. Results Evidence suggests that uptake of existing digital modes of engagement is currently low. Patients who use digital alternatives to face-to-face consultations are likely to be younger, female and have higher income and education levels. There is some evidence that online triage tools can divert demand away from primary care, but results vary between interventions and outcome measures. A number of potential barriers exist to using digital alternatives to face-to-face consultations, including inadequate NHS technology and staff concerns about workload and confidentiality. There are currently insufficient empirical data to either substantiate or allay such concerns. Very little evidence exists on outcomes related to quality of care, service delivery, benefits or harms for patients, or on financial costs/cost-effectiveness. No studies examining how to contract and commission alternatives to face-to-face consultations were identified. Limitations The quality of the included reviews was variable. Poor reporting of methodology and a lack of adequate study details were common issues. Much of the evidence focused on exploring stakeholder views rather than on objective measurement of potential impacts. The current evidence synthesis is based on a rapid scoping exercise and cannot provide the breadth or depth of insight that might have been achieved with a full systematic review. Conclusions Rapid scoping of the literature suggests that there is little high-quality evidence relating to ‘digital-first primary care’ as defined by NHS England. The broader evidence on alternatives to face-to-face consultation addresses certain policy-maker concerns, such as the possible impact of new technologies on workload and workforce, inequalities, local implementation and integration with existing services. However, although this evidence gives an insight into the views and experiences of health professionals in relation to such concerns, quantitative empirical data are lacking

A Systematic Review of Treatment Approaches for Childhood Apraxia of Speech

Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) is defined as "a neurological childhood (pediatric) speech sound disorder in which the precision and consistency of movements underlying speech are impaired in the absence of neuromuscular deficits" (ASHA Position Statement, 2007). CAS is an increasingly common diagnosis, but there is a shortage of empirical evidence to support the use of evidence-based practice in clinical treatment. Objective: This systematic review aimed to investigate the highest quality evidence available concerning the efficacy of different treatment approaches for CAS

Delivering direct patient care in the haemodialysis unit: a focused ethnographic study of care delivery

Background: Direct patient care is a term used within nursing and healthcare to help quantify and qualify care delivery. Direct patient care time is considered as a valuable measure by healthcare providers to indicate efficiency and to quantify nursing work, however little is understood of the patient experience and care delivery in haemodialysis settings.Aim: To gain an understanding of patients’ and nursing staff perceptions and experiences of ‘direct patient care’ within one haemodialysis unit.Methods: A focused ethnographic approach utilised participant observations, informal questioning, photographs and 27 semi-structured interviews of registered nurses, clinical support workers and patients. Observation notes and interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed. Results: The key finding was the construction and reconceptualisation of care delivery in this setting. Care was identified to be delivered in two distinct ways, both of which allowed patients to feel cared for. ‘Active care’ where patients feel cared for when they are being dealt with directly by staff and ‘Passive care’ where patients feel cared for through staff availability and visibility.Conclusion: Developing this understanding of patient care delivery in this specialism has highlighted some important aspects to the way care can be delivered which challenges current traditional understandings of direct patient care. Time spent with a patient is not the only important consideration to patient experience in haemodialysis. This understanding of passive care could improve care experiences in this setting

Regulating and inspecting integrated health and social care in the UK : scoping the literature

Background: The integration of care, particularly across the health and social care sectors, has been a long-standing policy objective in the UK. We sought to scope the evidence related to the regulation and inspection of integrated care. Objective(s): To identify and classify published material that could potentially address four key questions: 1. What models of regulation and inspection of integrated care have been proposed? (Including approaches taken in other countries) 2. What evidence is available on the effectiveness of such models? 3. What are the barriers and enablers of effective regulation and inspection of integrated care? 4. Can barriers to effective regulation and inspection be overcome without legislative change? Design: Rapid scoping review. Publication type and focus: Both empirical and non-empirical publications related to the regulation and inspection of integrated care were included. Setting: Publications focused on the integration of health and social care services, or provision delivered across other settings/sectors by different professional groups working together. Outcomes: Empirical studies reporting on any outcome relevant to the regulation and/or inspection of integrated care. Non-empirical publications focusing on any relevant issue including proposed models of regulation or outcome frameworks. Data sources: A targeted search of five databases was undertaken. Additionally, we conducted supplementary searches of the websites of key organisations and searched for other grey literature using the advanced search function of Google. Key contacts were also approached, and a request made for relevant documents. Review methods: The title and abstracts of 5380 records were screened and a total of 166 publications were included. Documents were coded based on key characteristics, and a descriptive summary of the literature produced. No attempt was made to assess the quality or synthesise the findings of the retrieved evidence. Results Out of the 166 included publications, 71 were identified from database searches and 95 were included from supplementary website searches. While there were records that could be classified as relevant to one or more of the research questions identified through the stakeholder consultation, there was a notable absence of evidence relating to (a) effectiveness of regulatory/inspection strategies and (b) professional regulation. Conclusions and future work The evidence base relating to the regulation or inspection of integrated care is relatively small. There may be an opportunity to synthesise some of the existing views and experience data on system regulation and inspection identified in a more formal systematic review. However, before a useful evidence base can be developed, policy makers and researchers need to agree what constitutes ‘effective’ regulation, how this can be measured, and which study designs are most appropriate for evaluation. Related questions about what constitutes ‘successful’ integration of care should also be taken into account when planning such research. While potentially useful reforms have been proposed, empirical evidence in relation to professional regulation appears particularly scarce. Organisations responsible for regulating professionals might therefore consider incorporating some form of evaluation into any planned strategic reforms. Limitations The degree of focus on integration or regulation was a difficult criterion to apply with strict consistency

Does frequent residential mobility in early years affect the uptake and timeliness of routine immunisations? An anonymised cohort study

Background: There are conflicting findings regarding the impact of residential mobility on immunisationstatus. Our aim was to determine whether there was any association between residential mobility andtake up of immunisations and whether they were delayed in administration. Methods: We carried out a cohort analysis of children born in Wales, UK. Uptake and time of immunisationwere collected electronically. We defined frequent movers as those who had moved: 2 or more times inthe period prior to the final scheduled on-time date (4 months) for 5 in 1 vaccinations; and 3 or moretimes in the period prior to the final scheduled on-time date (12 months) for MMR, pneumococcal andmeningitis C vaccinations. We defined immunisations due at 2–4 months delayed if they had not beengiven by age 1; and those due at 12–13 months as delayed if they had not been given by age 2. Results: Uptake rates of routine immunisations and whether they were given within the specified time-frame were high for both groups. There was no increased risk (odds ratios (95% confidence intervals)between frequent movers compared to non-movers for the uptake of: primary MMR 1.08 (0.88–1.32);booster Meningitis C 1.65 (0.93–2.92); booster pneumococcal 1.60 (0.59–4.31); primary 5 in 1 1.28(0.92–1.78); and timeliness: primary MMR 0.92 (0.79–1.07); booster Meningitis C 1.26 (0.77–2.07);booster pneumococcal 1.69 (0.23–12.14); and primary 5 in 1 1.04 (0.88–1.23). Discussion: Findings suggest that children who move home frequently are not adversely affected in termsof the uptake of immunisations and whether they were given within a specified timeframe. Both werehigh and may reflect proactive behaviour in the primary healthcare setting to meet Government coveragerates for immunisation

Становище Заславського римо-католицького деканату в ХІХ столітті (The situation of the Zaslavsky Roman-Catholic Deanery in the 19th century)

Стаття присвячена аналізу римо-католицизму на Заславщині у ХІХ ст. Доведено, що становище Заславського римо-католицького деканату протягом ХІХ століття погіршувалося, що відповідало загальним тенденціям ситуації РКЦ в Російській імперії. (The article is devoted to the analysis of Roman Catholicism in Zaslavsk region in the 19th century. It is proved that the situation of Zaslavsky Roman Catholic deanery during the 19th century worsened, which corresponded to the general tendencies of the situation of the RCC in the Russian Empire.