14 research outputs found

    Prevention of Neurological Deficit With Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

    No full text
    STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: While intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been increasingly used in spine surgery to have a real-time evaluation of the neurological injury, we aim here to assess its utility during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and its association with postoperative neurological deficit. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ALIF is a beneficial surgical approach for patients with degenerative disease of the lower lumbar spine who would benefit from increased lordosis and restoration of neuroforaminal height. One risk of ALIF is iatrogenic nerve root injury. IONM may be useful in preventing this injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 111 consecutive patients who underwent ALIF at a tertiary care academic center by 6 spine surgeons. We aimed to describe the association between IONM, postoperative weakness, and factors that predispose our center to using IONM. RESULTS: The 111 patients had a median age of 62 years [interquartile range (IQR): 53-69 y]. Neuromonitoring was used in 67 patients (60.3%) and not used in 44 patients. Seven neuromonitoring patients had IONM changes during the surgery. Three of these patients\u27 surgeries featured intraoperative adjustments to reduce iatrogenic neural injury. The IONM cohort underwent significantly more complex procedures [5 levels (IQR: 3-7) vs. 2 levels (IQR: 2-5), P=0.001]. There was no difference in rates of new or worsened postoperative weakness (IONM: 20.6%, non-IONM: 20.5%). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate evidence of the potential benefits of IONM for patients undergoing ALIF. Intraoperative changes in neuromonitoring signals resulted in surgical adjustments that likely prevented neurological deficits postoperatively. IONM was protective so that more complex surgeries did not have a higher rate of postoperative weakness

    Novel Titanium Cages for Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: First Assessment of Subsidence

    No full text
    Introduction: Implant subsidence is a potential complication of spinal interbody fusion and may negatively affect patients subjected to procedures relying on indirect decompression such as minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). The porous architecture of a recently developed titanium intervertebral cage maximizes bone-to-implant contact and minimizes stress shielding in laboratory experiments; however, its subsidence rate in patients has not yet been evaluated. The goal of this current study was to evaluate implant subsidence in patients subjected to LLIF. Methods: Our institutional review board-approved single-center experience included 29 patients who underwent 30 minimally invasive LLIF from July 2017 to September 2018 utilizing the novel 3D-printed porous titanium implants. Radiographs, obtained during routine postoperative follow-up visits, were reviewed for signs of implant subsidence, defined as any appreciable compromise of the vertebral endplates. Results: Radiographic subsidence occurred in 2 cases (6.7%), involving 2 out of 59 porous titanium interbody cages (3.4%). Both cases of subsidence occurred in four-level stand-alone constructs. The patients remained asymptomatic and did not require surgical revision. Ten surgeries were stand-alone constructs, and 20 surgeries included supplemental posterior fixation. Conclusions: In our patient cohort, subsidence of the porous titanium intervertebral cage occurred in 6.7% of all cases and in 3.4% of all lumbar levels. This subsidence rate is lower compared to previously reported subsidence rates in patients subjected to LLIF using polyetheretherketone implants

    Novel Titanium Cages for Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: First Assessment of Subsidence

    No full text
    Introduction: Implant subsidence is a potential complication of spinal interbody fusion and may negatively affect patients subjected to procedures relying on indirect decompression such as minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). The porous architecture of a recently developed titanium intervertebral cage maximizes bone-to-implant contact and minimizes stress shielding in laboratory experiments; however, its subsidence rate in patients has not yet been evaluated. The goal of this current study was to evaluate implant subsidence in patients subjected to LLIF. Methods: Our institutional review board-approved single-center experience included 29 patients who underwent 30 minimally invasive LLIF from July 2017 to September 2018 utilizing the novel 3D-printed porous titanium implants. Radiographs, obtained during routine postoperative follow-up visits, were reviewed for signs of implant subsidence, defined as any appreciable compromise of the vertebral endplates. Results: Radiographic subsidence occurred in 2 cases (6.7%), involving 2 out of 59 porous titanium interbody cages (3.4%). Both cases of subsidence occurred in four-level stand-alone constructs. The patients remained asymptomatic and did not require surgical revision. Ten surgeries were stand-alone constructs, and 20 surgeries included supplemental posterior fixation. Conclusions: In our patient cohort, subsidence of the porous titanium intervertebral cage occurred in 6.7% of all cases and in 3.4% of all lumbar levels. This subsidence rate is lower compared to previously reported subsidence rates in patients subjected to LLIF using polyetheretherketone implants

    Factors associated with hardware failure after lateral thoracolumbar fusions - A ten year case series.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: Thoracolumbar lateral interbody fusions (tLLIF) are one tool in the spine surgeon\u27s toolbox to indirectly decompress neuroforamina while also improving segmental lordosis in a biomechanically distinct manner from posterior fusions. When part of a concomitant posterior construct, hardware failure (HF), sometimes requiring revision surgery, can occur. We sought to study the relationship between tLLIF and HF. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive patents who underwent tLLIF at a single academic center between January 2012 and December 2021 by seven unique neurosurgeons. Patients were excluded if they had no posterior instrumentation within their construct or if they had less than six months of follow-up. Hardware failure was defined as screw breakage or rod fracture seen on postoperative imaging. RESULTS: 232 patients were identified; 6 (2.6 %) developed HF throughout a mean follow-up of 1182 days (range =748-1647 days). Adjacent segment disease was the most common pathology addressed (75 patients (32.3 %)). The amount of posterior instrumentation both in the surgery in question and in the total construct were significantly higher in the HF cohort (4.33 ± 1.52 levels, 5.83 ± 3.36 levels) versus the non-HF cohort (2.08 ± 0.296 levels, p = 0.014; 2.86 ± 0.316 levels, p = 0.003, respectively). The number of interbody devices added in the index surgery and in the entire construct were both significantly higher in the HF cohort (3.33 ± 0.666 interbody devices, 3.33 ± 0.666 devices) than in the non-HF cohort (1.88 ± 0.152 interbody devices, p = 0.002; 2.31 ± 0.158 devices, p = 0.036, respectively). Higher amounts of lateral levels of fusion approached significance for association with HF (HF: 2.67 ± 0.844 levels, no HF: 1.73 ± 1.26 levels, p = 0.076). On multivariate analysis, only the number of interbody devices added in the index surgery was predictive of HF (Odds ratio=2.3, 95 % confidence interval=1.25-4.23, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Greater levels of posterior fusion, and greater numbers of interbody devices in an index surgery and in a construct as a whole, were associated with higher rates of HF in our cohort of patients with tLLIF. Greater numbers of lateral segments fused in this population may also be related to HF

    Anterior Petrosectomy: Consecutive Series of 46 Patients with Attention to Approach-Related Complications

    No full text
    Objective: Anterior petrosectomy(AP) was popularized in the 1980s and 1990s as micro-neurosurgery proliferated. Original reports concentrated on the anatomy of the approach and small case series. Recently, with the advent of additional endonasal approaches to the petrous apex, the morbidity of AP remains unclear. This report details approach-related morbidity around and under the temporal lobe. Methods: A total of 46 consecutive patients identified from our surgical database were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Of the 46 patients, 61% were women. Median age of the patients was 50 years (mean: 48 ± 2 years). Median follow-up of this cohort was 66 months. Most procedures dealt with intradural pathology (n = 40 [87%]). Approach-related morbidity consisted of only two patients (4%) with new postoperative seizures. There were only two significant postoperative hemorrhages (4%). Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in two patients (4%) requiring reoperation. Conclusion: Approach-related complications such as seizures and hematoma were infrequent in this series, \u3c 4%. This report describes a contemporary group of patients treated with open AP and should serve as a comparison for approach-related morbidity of endoscopic approaches. Given the pathologies treated with this approach, the morbidity appears acceptable

    Anterior Inferior Petrosectomy: Defining the Role of Endonasal Endoscopic Techniques for Petrous Apex Approaches

    No full text
    Object: Historically, surgery to the petrous apex has been addressed via craniotomy and open microscopic anterior petrosectomy (OAP). However, with the popularization of endoscopic approaches, the petrous apex can further be approached endonasally by way of an endoscopic endonasal anterior petrosectomy (EAP). Endonasal anterior petrosectomy is a relatively new procedure and has not been compared anatomically with OAP. The authors hypothesized that the EAP and OAP techniques approach different portions of the petrous apex and therefore may have different applications. Methods: Four cadaveric heads were used. An OAP was performed on one side and an EAP was performed on the contralateral side; the limits of bony resection were defined. The extent of bony resection was then evaluated using predissection and postdissection thin-slice CT scans. The comparative resection was then reconstructed using 3D modeling on Brainlab workstations. Results: The average resection volumes for EAP and OAP were 0.297 cm3 and 0.649 cm3, respectively, representing a comparative percentage of 46% (EAP/OAP). An EAP and OAP achieved resection of 29% and 64% of the total petrous apex volume, respectively. Indeed, EAP addressed the inferior portion of the petrous apex located adjacent to the petroclival suture more completely than OAP, where 45% of the bone overlying the petroclival suture (petroclival angle to the jugular foramen) was resected with the EAP, while 0% was resected with the OAP. Conclusion: In anatomically normal cadavers, OAP achieved nearly a 50% larger volumetric resection than EAP. Furthermore, while OAP appears to completely address the superior portion of the petrous apex, EAP appears to have a niche in approaches to lesions in the inferior petrous apex. Given these results, the authors propose that OAP be redefined as the “superior anterior petrosectomy,” while EAP be referred to as the “inferior anterior petrosectomy,” which more clearly defines the role of each approach in anterior petrosectomy

    Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Upper Instrumented Vertebra Cement Augmentation Reducing Early Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure Rate in Adult Spinal Deformity: Case Series and Literature Review.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: One of the risks involved after long-segment fusions includes proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF). There are reported modalities to help prevent this, including 2-level prophylactic vertebroplasty. In this study, our goal was to report the largest series of prophylactic cement augmentation with upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) + 1 vertebroplasty and a literature review. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our long-segment fusions for adult spinal deformity from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome measures included the incidence of PJK and PJF. Secondary outcomes included preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale back and leg scores, surgical site infection, and plastic surgery closure assistance. In addition, we performed a literature review searching PubMed with a combination of the following words: cement augmentation, UIV + 1 vertebroplasty, adjacent segment disease, and prophylactic vertebroplasty. We found a total of 8 articles including 4 retrospective reviews, 2 prospective reviews, and 2 systematic reviews. The largest cohort of these articles included 39 patients with a PJK/PJF incidence of 28%/5%. RESULTS: Overall, we found 72 long-segment thoracolumbar fusion cases with prophylactic UIV cement augmentation with UIV + 1 vertebroplasty. The mean follow-up time was 17.25 months. Of these cases, 8 (11.1%) developed radiographic PJK and 3 (4.2%) required reoperation for PJF. Of the remaining 5 patients with radiographic PJK, 3 were clinically asymptomatic and treated conservatively and 2 had distal fractured rods that required only rod replacement. CONCLUSION: In this study, we report the largest series of patients with prophylactic percutaneous vertebroplasty and UIV cement augmentation with a low PJK and PJF incidence of 11.1% and 4.2%, respectively, compared with previously reported literature. Surgeons who regularly perform long-segment fusions for adult spinal deformity can consider this in their armamentarium when using methods to prevent adjacent segment disease because it is an effective modality in reducing early PJK and PJF that can often result in revision surgery

    Management of Thoracic Disc Herniation Using the Mini-Open Retropleural Approach: Technique Illustration and Clinical Outcomes of 33 Patients From a Single Academic Center

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Conventional surgical approaches used in the management of thoracic disc herniation (TDH) are associated with high morbidity. The development of minimally invasive and mini-open approaches has consistently improved patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To report our experience and outcomes of patients with symptomatic TDHs who underwent discectomy and partial corpectomy using the mini-open retropleural (MORP) approach as well as provide a detailed and illustrated technical description of the approach. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with symptomatic TDHs who underwent a MORP approach at a tertiary academic center between 2011 and 2019. Patient demographic, clinical, and imaging data were examined (n = 33). The surgical technique is illustrated and described in detail. RESULTS: Discectomy of the herniated thoracic discs was successfully achieved in all patients using the MORP approach. Calcified discs were present in 63.6% (n = 21) of patients. Immediate instrumentation and fusion were performed in 30.3% (n = 10) of patients, which were among the earlier cases in this series. Symptomatic pleural effusions and cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 6.1% (n = 2) and 9.1% (n = 3), respectively. No patient required chest tube placement. CONCLUSION: The MORP approach described in this manuscript is feasible and safe in achieving discectomy in patients with symptomatic TDHs. Compared to conventional open and other minimally invasive approaches, patients undergoing the MORP approach may have better outcomes with lower complication rates

    Three-column osteotomy in long constructs has lower rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and better restoration of lumbar lordosis than anterior column realignment.

    No full text
    PURPOSE: Three-column osteotomies (TCOs) and minimally invasive techniques such as anterior column realignment (ACR) are powerful tools used to restore lumbar lordosis and sagittal alignment. We aimed to appraise the differences in construct and global spinal stability between TCOs and ACRs in long constructs. METHODS: We identified consecutive patients who underwent a long construct lumbar or thoracolumbar fusion between January 2016 and November 2021. Long construct was any construct where the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) was L2 or higher and the lowermost instrumented vertebra (LIV) was in the sacrum or ileum. RESULTS: We identified 69 patients; 14 (20.3%) developed PJK throughout follow-up (mean 838 days). Female patients were less likely to suffer PJK (p = 0.009). TCO was more associated with open (versus minimally invasive) screw/rod placement, greater number of levels, higher UIV, greater rate of instrumentation to the ilium, and posterior (versus anterior) L5-S1 interbody placement versus the ACR cohort (p \u3c 0.001, p \u3c 0.001, p \u3c 0.001, p \u3c 0.001, p = 0.005, respectively). Patients who developed PJK were more likely to have undergone ACR (12 (32.4%) versus 2 (6.3%, p = 0.007)). The TCO cohort had better improvement of lumbar lordosis despite similar preoperative measurements (ACR: 16.8 ± 3.78°, TCO: 23.0 ± 5.02°, p = 0.046). Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch had greater improvement after TCO (ACR: 14.8 ± 4.02°, TCO: 21.5 ± 5.10°, p = 0.042). By multivariate analysis, ACR increased odds of PJK by 6.1-times (95% confidence interval: 1.20-31.2, p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: In patients with long constructs who undergo ACR or TCO, we experienced a 20% rate of PJK. TCO decreased PJK 6.1-times compared to ACR. TCO demonstrated greater improvement of some spinopelvic parameters
    corecore