Reproductive health and access to healthcare facilities: risk factors for depression and anxiety in women with an earthquake experience

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The reproductive and mental health of women contributes significantly to their overall well-being. Three of the eight Millennium Development Goals are directly related to reproductive and sexual health while mental disorders make up three of the ten leading causes of disease burden in low and middle-income countries. Among mental disorders, depression and anxiety are two of the most prevalent. In the context of slower progress in achieving Millennium Development Goals in developing countries and the ever-increasing man-made and natural disasters in these areas, it is important to understand the association between reproductive health and mental health among women with post-disaster experiences.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was a cross-sectional study with a sample of 387 women of reproductive age (15-49 years) randomly selected from the October 2005 earthquake affected areas of Pakistan. Data on reproductive health was collected using the Centers for Disease Control reproductive health assessment toolkit. Depression and anxiety were measured using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25, while earthquake experiences were captured using the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire. The association of either depression or anxiety with socio-demographic variables, earthquake experiences, reproductive health and access to health facilities was estimated using multivariate logistic regression.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Post-earthquake reproductive health events together with economic deprivation, lower family support and poorer access to health care facilities explained a significant proportion of differences in the experiencing of clinical levels of depression and anxiety. For instance, women losing resources for subsistence, separation from family and experiencing reproductive health events such as having a stillbirth, having had an abortion, having had abnormal vaginal discharge or having had genital ulcers, were at significant risk of depression and anxiety.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The relationship between women's post-earthquake mental health and reproductive health, socio-economic status, and health care access is complex and explained largely by the socio-cultural role of women. It is suggested that interventions that consider gender differences and that are culturally appropriate are likely to reduce the incidence.</p

Controlling exit site infections: does it decrease the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia in children on chronic hemodialysis?

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether the application of a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing (Biopatch) at the exit site of tunneled-cuffed hemodialysis catheters has any effect on the incidence and etiology of catheter-related bacteremia (CRB). This study was carried out over a 5-year period in a single center, where, in the first 2(1/2) years, the exit sites were cleansed with betadine at every hemodialysis session and then covered with a transparent dressing (pre-Biopatch Era). During the next 2(1/2) years, Biopatch was applied to the exit site once a week after cleansing with betadine, and then covered with a transparent dressing (Biopatch Era). The application of Biopatch significantly decreased the incidence of exit site infections (ESI) (P<0.05). However, there was no difference in the incidence of CRBs or their microbiological distribution. The improved ESI rate had no effect on the overall catheter survival time. The antimicrobial sensitivities of the Gram-positive microorganisms were statistically different for the 2 different types of infections (P<0.05). In conclusion, even though Biopatch is effective in decreasing the incidence of ESI, it has no effect on the incidence of CRB, the etiology of CRB, or the overall catheter survival time. The distinct difference between the antimicrobial sensitivities of the ESI and CRB suggests that they are not a spectrum of the same pathogenesis. These preliminary data support the intraluminal pathogenesis of CRB, rather than the exit site as a possible entry point for the extraluminal route

Chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solutions effectively reduce catheter-related bacteremia

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate if the application of chlorhexidine-based solutions (ChloraPrep) to the exit site and the hub of long-term hemodialysis catheters could prevent catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) and prolong catheter survival when compared with povidone-iodine solutions. There were 20,784 catheter days observed. Povidone-iodine solutions (Betadine) were used in the first half of the study and ChloraPrep was used in the second half for all the patients. Both groups received chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings at the exit sites. The use of ChloraPrep significantly decreased the incidence of CRB (1.0 vs 2.2/1,000 catheter days, respectively, P = 0.0415), and hospitalization due to CRB (1.8 days vs 4.1 days/1,000 catheter days, respectively, P = 0.0416). The incidence of exit site infection was similar for the two groups. Both the period of overall catheter survival (207.6 days vs 161.1 days, P = 0.0535) and that of infection-free catheter survival (122.0 days vs 106.9 days, P = 0.1100) tended to be longer for the catheters cleansed with ChloraPrep, with no statistical significance. In conclusion, chlorhexidine-based solutions are more effective for the prevention of CRB than povidone-iodine solutions. This positive impact cannot be explained by decreased number of exit site infections. This study supports the notion that the catheter hub is the entry site for CRB

PREFABL: predictors of failure of antibiotic locks for the treatment of catheter-related bacteraemia

Antibiotic lock (ABL) solutions can effectively treat catheter-related bacteraemia (CRB) without the need for catheter exchange. This approach does not increase secondary infectious complications. We evaluated the risk factors that contribute to failure when CRB is treated with ABLs and systemic antibiotics in paediatric haemodialysis patients. A retrospective chart review of 72 children on haemodialysis between January 2004 and June 2006 was performed. We evaluated risk factors for ABL treatment using patients' characteristics, CRB/catheter characteristics and patients' biochemical profiles. The first CRB of each catheter was included in the statistical analysis. Our end points were outcome at 2 weeks of treatment and at 6 weeks following treatment. Compound symmetry covariance structure was employed for statistical analysis. We treated 149 CRB in 50 patients. The incidence was 3.4 CRB/1000 catheter days. Thirty CRB failed to be cleared with the use of ABL and systemic antibiotics at 2 weeks of treatment (30/149, 20 vs 80%, P < 0.001). Twenty-four of these catheters required exchange. Thirty-nine of the treated catheters got re-infected within the next 6 weeks (39/125, 31 vs 69%, P < 0.001). CRB aetiology was the only statistically significant independent variable for 2-week outcome (P = 0.033). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus CRB had higher odds of being cleared at 2 weeks compared with other CRB aetiologies. For the 6-week outcome, the statistically significant independent variables in the final model included age (P = 0.048) and serum phosphorous level (P < 0.001). Younger age and higher serum phosphorous levels were independent risk factors for failure at 6 weeks with re-infection. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the model of the 2-week outcome was 0.736 with the percentage of correct predictions at 81.2%. Area under the ROC curve for the model of the 6-week outcome was 0.689 with the percentage of correct predictions at 75.5%. CRB can effectively be treated with ABLs and systemic antibiotics. CRB aetiology is the only independent variable of early treatment failure. Younger age and higher serum phosphorous levels are independent risk factors for re-infection at 6 weeks

Comparison of tissue plasminogen activator-antibiotic locks with heparin-antibiotic locks in children with catheter-related bacteraemia

Background. An accepted pathogenesis of catheter-related bacteraemia (CRB) is the seeding of microorganisms from the intraluminal biofilm of central venous catheters. Antibiotic locks (ABL) are solutions containing high concentrations of antimicrobials with or without anticoagulants that aim to destroy the biofilm. Methods. In this study, two different ABL solutions, tissue plasminogen activator (TPA)-based and heparin-based ABL, used in conjunction with systemic antibiotics, were prospectively compared in the treatment of CRB. Results. A total of 42 children on chronic haemodialysis with 11 016 catheter-days were observed for signs and symptoms of CRB over a period of 10 months. Twenty-four CRBs were diagnosed in 18 children (2.2 CRB 1000 catheter-days) and were treated with the protocol. Symptoms of CRB resolved in 83% within 48 h of treatment. None of the infected catheters required early emergent exchange or removal for poorly controlled CRB. Six children had recurrence of CRB within 6 weeks, of which four required catheter exchange. There was no specific microorganism or type of CRB that predisposed to higher recurrence rates. The mean infection-free survival of the catheters following TPA-ABL treatment was shorter than that following heparin-ABL treatment, but was not statistically significant by the log-rank test (126.8 ± 81.6 days versus 154.5 ± 70.4 days). Conclusion. Both TPA-ABL and heparin-ABL used in conjunction with systemic antibiotics can effectively clear CRB without significant late recurrence at 6 weeks. Early use of ABL for management of CRB can potentially decrease the need for catheter removal, thus salvaging vascular access sites

Prophylaxis of catheter-related bacteremia using tissue plasminogen activator-tobramycin locks

This retrospective study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of tissue plasminogen activator-tobramycin antibiotic lock solutions (TPA/tobra ABLs) for prophylaxis of catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) in high-risk children on long-term hemodialysis. During the first 6 months (Era 1), the high-risk group was defined. These patients received TPA/tobra ABL prophylaxis after every hemodialysis treatment for the next 6 months (Era 2). The prophylaxis regimen was applied once a week for the third 6-months period (Era 3). Primary endpoints were CRB and infection-free catheter survival. There were 16,412 catheter days, and 95 cases of CRB in 43 children. The incidence of CRB was 5.8/1,000 catheter days. Significant decrease in the incidence of CRB was observed when prophylactic TPA/tobra ABL was used in the high-risk group (P = 0.0201). There was a tendency for less CRB when prophylactic ABL was applied after every hemodialysis session compared with once a week (P = 0.0947). The catheters in the high-risk group had shorter survival times than those in the average-risk group in Era 1 (P < 0.0001). However, both the overall and infection-free survival of the catheters in the high-risk group significantly improved while the patients were receiving TPA/tobra ABL prophylaxis, becoming similar to the outcomes of the catheters in the average-risk group and exhibiting statistically non-significant differences (P = 0.5571 and P = 0.9711, respectively). In conclusion, the TPA/tobra ABLs may effectively reduce the rate of CRB, and this may prolong both the overall and infection-free survival times of the catheters in the high-risk group

Comparison of Early versus Late Use of Antibiotic Locks in the Treatment of Catheter-Related Bacteremia

Background and objectives: This retrospective study compared the effectiveness of the timing of the antibiotic locks to clear catheter-related bacteremia in children on chronic hemodialysis

Antibiotic lock solutions allow less systemic antibiotic exposure and less catheter malfunction without adversely affecting antimicrobial resistance patterns

There are current concerns that antibiotic lock solutions (ABL) can induce antimicrobial resistance in long-term hemodialysis patients. Retrospective chart review of 157 children on hemodialysis between January 1997 and June 2006 was performed. In ERA I, only systemic antibiotics were used. In ERA II, ABL were added to systemic antibiotics when needed. In ERA III, ABL were used for treatment of all cases of catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) and for CRB prophylaxis in high-risk patients. The study includes 111,325 catheter days. The CRB incidence was 3.9 CRB/1000 catheter days. There was significant decrease for the total systemic antibiotic exposure (P = 0.0484) and the percentage of catheters lost to malfunction (P = 0.001) in ERA III. Protocol ABL exposure was associated with a trend to increased tobramycin-gentamicin resistance for gram-positive CRBs (P = 0.2586) but with improved tobramycin-gentamicin resistance for gram-negative (P = 0.0949) and polymicrobial CRBs (P = 0.1776) and improved vancomycin resistance for gram-positive CRBs (P = 0.0985). This retrospective analysis does not support the premise that ABL use will promote antimicrobial resistance in the hemodialysis population. The decreased exposure to systemic antibiotics by vigorous ABL use may even improve the antimicrobial resistance patterns in this population in the long term

Treatment of catheter-related bacteremia with tissue plasminogen activator antibiotic locks

This retrospective study was completed to investigate the effectiveness of tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) antibiotic locks (ABL) along with systemic antibiotics (AB) to clear catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) in children on chronic hemodialysis. There were 76 CRBs in 37 children. CRBs were successfully cleared with AB/ABL in 63/76 (83%) cases. Ten of 76 (13%) CRBs were symptomatic at 48 h of treatment. These were seven polymicrobial, two gram-negative, and one Candida CRB. 13/76 (17%) episodes required catheter exchange, and all were wire-guided exchanges. TPA-ABL/AB cleared gram-positive and gram-negative CRBs significantly better than polymicrobial CRBs (p < 0.01). The infection-free survival and the rate of recurrence at 45 days was not statistically different between the TPA-ABL/AB group and the catheter-exchange group. If CRB was symptomatic at 48 h of treatment, recurrence at 6 weeks was more frequent with persistent use of TPA-ABL/AB (p < 0.05). There were no episodes of metastatic infections, catheter malfunction from occlusion, or catheter breakdown during the course of TPA-ABL treatments. In conclusion, TPA-ABL can be safely and effectively used in the management of CRB, increasing the probability of catheter survival and preserving the vascular access site. With the exception of polymicrobial CRB, there is no disadvantage in using TPA-ABL/AB over catheter exchange, as the infection-free survival and the rate of recurrence are comparable