Live birth prevalence of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in the United States from 1996 to 2010AJOG Global Reports at a Glance

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is mediated by maternal alloantibodies, a consequence of immune sensitization during pregnancy with maternal-fetal incompatibility with ABO, Rhesus factor (Rh), and/or other red blood cell antigens. RhD, Kell, and other non-ABO alloantibodies are the primary cause of moderate to severe HDFN, whereas ABO HDFN is typically mild. HDFN live birth prevalence owing to Rh alloimmunization among newborns in the United States was last estimated to be 106 per 100,000 births in 1986. HDFN live birth prevalence owing to all alloantibodies was estimated to be 817 to 840 per 100,000 in Europe. There is a need for updated prevalence estimates in the United States and a better understanding of disease demographics, severity, and treatments. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the live birth prevalence of HDFN and the proportion of severe cases of HDFN in the United States, to describe the associated risk factors, and to compare the clinical outcomes and treatments among healthy newborns, newborns with HDFN, and newborns who are sick without HDFN using a nationally representative hospital discharge database. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we used data from the 1996 to 2010 National Hospital Discharge Survey to identify live births, defined by inpatient visits with the newborn flag, with and without a diagnosis of HDFN across 200 to 500 sampled hospitals (≥6 beds) per year. Patient and hospital characteristics, alloimmunization status, disease severity, treatment, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Frequencies and weighted percentages were calculated for all variables. Logistic regression was used to compare the characteristics between newborns with HDFN and other newborns using odds ratios. RESULTS: Of 480,245 live births identified, 9810 HDFN cases were recorded. When weighted to the United States population, this corresponded to a live birth prevalence of 1695 per 100,000 live births. Compared with other newborns, newborns with HDFN were more likely to be female, Black, living in the South (vs the Midwest or West), and treated at larger (>100 beds) and government-owned hospitals. ABO and Rh alloimmunization accounted for 78.1% and 4.3% of newborns with HDFN, respectively, whereas HDFN caused by other antigens, such as Kell and Duffy, accounted for 17.6% of the cases. Among newborns with HDFN, 22% received phototherapy, 1% received simple transfusions, and 0.5% received exchange transfusions or intravenous immunoglobulin. Newborns affected by HDFN caused by Rh alloimmunization were more likely to require medical interventions, including simple or exchange transfusions, and more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery. Overall, HDFN was associated with a longer hospital length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit when compared with healthy and other sick newborns, a higher rate of cesarean delivery, and a higher rate of nonroutine discharge than healthy newborns. CONCLUSION: Overall, the live birth prevalence of HDFN was higher than those previously reported, whereas Rh-induced HDFN live birth prevalence was similar to those previously reported. HDFN live birth prevalence owing to Rh alloimmunization decreased over time, likely because of continued Rh immune globulin prophylaxis. Treatment patterns for newborns with HDFN and the comparative clinical outcomes when compared with healthy newborns confirm the continued clinical needs of this population

Patterns of Initiation of Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation- Quality and Cost Implications

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have been approved for use in patients with atrial fibrillation based upon randomized trials demonstrating their comparable or superior efficacy and safety relative to warfarin. Little is known about their adoption into clinical practice, whether utilization is consistent with the controlled trials on which their approval was based, and how their use has affected health spending for patients and insurers. METHODS: We used medical and prescription claims data from a large insurer to identify patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were prescribed an oral anticoagulant in 2010-2013. We plotted trends in medication initiation over time, assessed corresponding insurer and patient out-of-pocket spending, and evaluated the cumulative number and cost of anticoagulants. We identified predictors of novel anticoagulant initiation using multivariable logistic models. Finally, we estimated the difference in total drug expenditures over 6 months for patients initiating warfarin versus a novel anticoagulant. RESULTS: There were 6893 patients with atrial fibrillation that initiated an oral anticoagulant during the study period. By the end of the study period, novel anticoagulants accounted for 62% of new prescriptions and 98% of anticoagulant-related drug costs. Female sex, lower household income, and higher CHADS 2 , CHA 2 DS 2 -VASC, and HAS-BLED scores were significantly associated with lower odds of receiving a novel anticoagulant (P <.001 for each). Average combined patient and insurer anticoagulant spending in the first 6 months after initiation was more than $900 greater for patients initiating a novel anticoagulant. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates rapid adoption of novel anticoagulants into clinical practice, particularly among patients with lower CHADS 2 and HAS-BLED scores, and high health care cost consequences. These findings provide important directions for future comparative and cost-effectiveness research