Effectively sampling rectal mucus and assessing the validity of a DNA methylation assay in the detection of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the Western world. Screening for CRC using faecal occult blood test (FOBT) is well established. There is evidence that DNA based stool tests may be more effective than FOBT. Hypothesis The hypothesis is that in patients with CRC, rectal mucus may contain DNA derived from colonic tumours. It is speculated that quantitative or qualitative assessment of DNA in rectal mucus may permit an improved method of CRC screening. Aims Using surgically resected specimens of colonic tumours: To assess the feasibility and reliability of measuring DNA in mucus samples To compare different devices to measure mucus DNA To assess the amount of mucus DNA at various distances from colonic tumours In patients with CRC and controls: To compare the amount of DNA in rectal mucus Using a panel of 3 DNA methylation markers, to compare the rectal mucus DNA methylation profile between patients with CRC and controls Methods Surgical colectomy specimens were obtained from 25 patients with CRC. The feasibility and repeatability of measuring mucus DNA amounts was established using different buffer solutions, different storage techniques and different sampling devices. Mucus DNA amounts were measured at tumour sites and various distances proximal and distal to the tumour. 58 patients referred to a colorectal outpatient clinic with suspected CRC were assessed. Rectal mucus samples were obtained using a balloon device introduced through a proctoscope. All patients were investigated by colonoscopy to clarify the presence or absence of a CRC. The amount of DNA in the mucus samples was measured. The presence of three DNA methylation markers (NDRG4, TFP12 and GATA4) was assessed in all samples. All studies were approved by the local ethics committee. Results Reliable measurement of DNA from mucus samples was established using balloon, foam and brush devices and a cell lysate buffer. Higher amounts of DNA in surgical specimens were found distal to tumours compared to proximally. In patients with CRC the amount of DNA in rectal mucus was higher than in controls (no disease or benign polyps). The three DNA methylation marker panel had a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 27.5% for the detection of CRC. Conclusions The results are consistent with the hypothesis that DNA detected in rectal mucus is derived from proximal tumours. Higher levels of rectal mucus DNA are obtained from patients with CRC than from controls. The selected DNA methylation panel was not sufficiently useful in our sample group to be of use as a screening technique, due to poor specificity. Further work is in progress to compare DNA abnormalities in resected tumour tissue with DNA from rectal mucus in the same patients. Future work may be required to improve the panel of DNA abnormalities assessed

Evolving trends in the management of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 waves. The ACIE appy II study

Background: In 2020, ACIE Appy study showed that COVID-19 pandemic heavily affected the management of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) worldwide, with an increased rate of non-operative management (NOM) strategies and a trend toward open surgery due to concern of virus transmission by laparoscopy and controversial recommendations on this issue. The aim of this study was to survey again the same group of surgeons to assess if any difference in management attitudes of AA had occurred in the later stages of the outbreak. Methods: From August 15 to September 30, 2021, an online questionnaire was sent to all 709 participants of the ACIE Appy study. The questionnaire included questions on personal protective equipment (PPE), local policies and screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection, NOM, surgical approach and disease presentations in 2021. The results were compared with the results from the previous study. Results: A total of 476 answers were collected (response rate 67.1%). Screening policies were significatively improved with most patients screened regardless of symptoms (89.5% vs. 37.4%) with PCR and antigenic test as the preferred test (74.1% vs. 26.3%). More patients tested positive before surgery and commercial systems were the preferred ones to filter smoke plumes during laparoscopy. Laparoscopic appendicectomy was the first option in the treatment of AA, with a declined use of NOM. Conclusion: Management of AA has improved in the last waves of pandemic. Increased evidence regarding SARS-COV-2 infection along with a timely healthcare systems response has been translated into tailored attitudes and a better care for patients with AA worldwide

Complete pathological response after ceritinib for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged epithelioid peritoneal mesothelioma

RD&E staff can access the full-text of this article by clicking on the 'Additional Link' above and logging in with NHS OpenAthens if prompted.Published version, accepted version (12 month embargo), submitted versio

Efficacy of fibrinogen concentrate in major abdominal surgery – A prospective, randomized, controlled study in cytoreductive surgery for pseudomyxoma peritonei

Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is associated with excessive bleeding and acquired fibrinogen deficiency. Maintaining plasma fibrinogen may support hemostasis. Objectives To compare hemostatic efficacy and safety of human fibrinogen concentrate (HFC) vs cryoprecipitate as fibrinogen sources for bleeding patients with acquired fibrinogen deficiency undergoing PMP CRS. Methods FORMA‐05 was an off‐label single‐center, prospective, randomized, controlled phase 2 study. Patients undergoing PMP surgery with predicted intraoperative blood loss ≥2 L received human fibrinogen concentrate (HFC; 4 g) or cryoprecipitate (two pools of 5 units, containing approximately 4.0‐4.6 g fibrinogen), repeated as needed. The primary endpoint was a composite of intraoperative and postoperative efficacy, graded using objective 4‐point scales and adjudicated by an independent committee. Results One hundred percent of patients receiving HFC (95% confidence interval: 83.9‐100.0, n = 21) or cryoprecipitate (84.6‐100.0, n = 22) achieved hemostatic success. HFC demonstrated noninferior efficacy (P = .0095; post hoc) and arrived in the operating room 46 minutes faster. There were significantly greater mean increases with HFC vs cryoprecipitate in plasma fibrinogen (0.78 vs 0.35 g/L; P < .0001) and FIBTEM A20 (3.33 vs 0.93 mm; P = .003). Factor XIII, factor VIII, and von Willebrand factor activity were maintained throughout surgery. Only red blood cells were transfused intraoperatively (median units: HFC group, 1.0; cryoprecipitate group, 0.5). Thromboembolic events were detected with cryoprecipitate only. Safety was otherwise comparable between groups. Conclusions Human fibrinogen concentrate was hemostatically efficacious in patients undergoing major abdominal PMP surgery, with a favorable safety profile. These results are relevant to other surgical settings where bleeding and acquired fibrinogen deficiency occur

Sarcopenia and myosteatosis predict adverse outcomes after emergency laparotomy: a multi-centre observational cohort study

Objective: To determine the relationship between body composition (BC), specifically low skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) and poor muscle quality (myosteatosis) and outcomes in emergency laparotomy patients. Background: Emergency laparotomy has one of the highest morbidity and mortality rates of all surgical interventions. BC objectively identifies patients at risk of adverse outcomes in elective cancer cohorts, however evidence is lacking in emergency surgery. Methods: An observational cohort study of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy at ten English hospitals was performed. BC analyses were performed at the third lumbar vertebrae level using pre-operative CT images to quantify skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle radiation attenuation (SM-RA). Sex-specific SMI and SM-RA were determined, with the lower tertile splits defining sarcopenia (low SMI) and myosteatosis (low SM-RA). Accuracy of mortality risk prediction, incorporating SMI and SM-RA variables into risk models was assessed with regression modelling. Results: Six hundred and ten patients were included. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis were both associated with increased risk of morbidity (52.1% vs. 45.1%, p = 0.028; 57.5% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.014), 30-day (9.5% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.010; 14.9% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), and 1-year mortality (27.4% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.001; 29.7% vs.12.5%, p < 0.001). Risk-adjusted 30-day mortality was significantly increased by sarcopenia (OR 2.56 (95%CI 1.12-5.84), p = 0.026) and myosteatosis (OR 4.26 (2.01-9.06), p < 0.001), similarly at 1-year (OR 2.66 (95%CI 1.57-4.52), p < 0.001; OR 2.08 (95%CI 1.26-3.41), p = 0.004). BC data increased discrimination of an existing mortality risk-prediction model (AUC 0.838, 95%CI 0.835-0.84). Conclusion: Sarcopenia and myosteatosis are associated with increased adverse outcomes in emergency laparotomy patients

Evolving trends in the management of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 waves. The ACIE appy II study (vol 46, pg 2021, 2022)

N/

Global attitudes in the management of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 pandemic: ACIE Appy Study

Background: Surgical strategies are being adapted to face the COVID-19 pandemic. Recommendations on the management of acute appendicitis have been based on expert opinion, but very little evidence is available. This study addressed that dearth with a snapshot of worldwide approaches to appendicitis. Methods: The Association of Italian Surgeons in Europe designed an online survey to assess the current attitude of surgeons globally regarding the management of patients with acute appendicitis during the pandemic. Questions were divided into baseline information, hospital organization and screening, personal protective equipment, management and surgical approach, and patient presentation before versus during the pandemic. Results: Of 744 answers, 709 (from 66 countries) were complete and were included in the analysis. Most hospitals were treating both patients with and those without COVID. There was variation in screening indications and modality used, with chest X-ray plus molecular testing (PCR) being the commonest (19\ub78 per cent). Conservative management of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis was used by 6\ub76 and 2\ub74 per cent respectively before, but 23\ub77 and 5\ub73 per cent, during the pandemic (both P < 0\ub7001). One-third changed their approach from laparoscopic to open surgery owing to the popular (but evidence-lacking) advice from expert groups during the initial phase of the pandemic. No agreement on how to filter surgical smoke plume during laparoscopy was identified. There was an overall reduction in the number of patients admitted with appendicitis and one-third felt that patients who did present had more severe appendicitis than they usually observe. Conclusion: Conservative management of mild appendicitis has been possible during the pandemic. The fact that some surgeons switched to open appendicectomy may reflect the poor guidelines that emanated in the early phase of SARS-CoV-2