2 research outputs found
ΠΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠ·ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΏΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²: ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ
Developping a multilingual corpus of terminology in linguistics can contribute to better organization and standardization of Russian and Chinese terms in the chosen field on the base of the existing works on the material of the English language. The scope of the project is to fill the lacunae, to disambiguate homonymy, to facilitate the choice of appropriate translation of a linguistic term and understanding of its context. The issue of the absence of Russian-Chinese-English and Chinese-Russian-English terminological dictionaries and the general desynchronization of terminological systems have been repeatedly mentioned in scientific works focused on the description of the language for special purposes. The search for a solution to these theoretical issues will help to find an algorithm for organizing the corpus of terms both within individual scientific disciplines and in interdisciplinary areas of arts and humanities. Multilingual corpus of terminology in linguistics implies the development of methodological recommendations and a complex of teaching materials including the digital ones, which will help foreign students to use the terms according to their level of language proficiency. The project is a continuation of a collective work oriented to the research of a language for professional communication. Language for professional communication is a functional type of a natural language the units of which transfer special knowledge. The absence of this knowledge makes professional communication impossible in the ways of perception, interpretation, translation and, creation of scientific texts in writing.Π‘ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠ·ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΏΡΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Β«ΠΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Β», ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ» Π±Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΄Ρ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ Π·Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π°ΠΊΡΠ½, ΡΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π΅ Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ°, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·-Π·Π° ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎ-ΠΊΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎ-Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎ-ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎ-Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Ρ
, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΠΎΠΈΡΠΊ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΡ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠ° ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΏΡΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡΡ
Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠ·ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΏΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°Π΅Ρ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
, ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ, ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π»Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΏΡΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Β«ΠΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Β», ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π² ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π±ΡΠ» ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ. Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΏΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ½Π³Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ Π² ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ΅. Π€ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΏΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ³ΡΡΠ·ΠΊΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡΡ
Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ½Π»Π°ΠΉΠ½ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ. Π‘ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠ·ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΏΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Ρ, ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΏΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ, ΠΊΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΈ
Epidemiology of Hereditary Diseases in the Karachay-Cherkess Republic
Prevalence and allelic heterogeneity of hereditary diseases (HDs) could vary significantly in different human populations. Current knowledge of HDs distribution in populations is generally limited to either European data or analyses of isolated populations which were performed several decades ago. Thus, an acknowledgement of the HDs prevalence in different modern open populations is important. The study presents the results of a genetic epidemiological study of hereditary diseases (HDs) in the population of the Karachay-Cherkess Republic (KChR). Clinical screening of a population of 410,367 people for the identification of HDs was conducted. The population surveyed is represented by five major ethnic groups—Karachays, Russians, Circassians, Abazins, Nogais. The study of the populations was carried out in accordance with the proprietary protocol of genetic epidemiological examination designed to identify >3500 HDs easily diagnosed during clinical examination by qualified specialists specializing in the HDs. The protocol consists of the population genetic and medical genetic sections and is intended for comprehensive population analysis based on the data on different genetic systems, including the genes of HDs, DNA polymorphisms, demographic data collected during hospital-based survey. 8950 families (with 10,125 patients) with presumably the HDs were initially identified as a result of the survey and data collection through various sources of registration (from 1156 medical workers from 163 medical institutions). A diagnosis of hereditary pathology was established in 1849 patients (from 1295 families). Two hundred and thirty nosological forms were revealed (in 1857 patients from 1295 families). The total prevalence of HDs was 1:221. Differences between populations and ethnic groups were identified: 1:350 in Russians, 1:195 in Karachays, 1:199 in Circassians, 1:218 in Abazins, 1:135 in Nogais. Frequent diseases were determined, the presence of marked genetic heterogeneity was identified during the confirmatory DNA diagnosis. To explain the reasons for the differentiation of populations by load of HD, a correlation analysis was carried out between the FST (random inbreeding) in populations and HDs load values. This analysis showed genetic drift is probably one of the leading factors determining the differentiation of KChR populations by HDs load. For the first time, the size of the load and spectrum of HDs in the populations of the KChR are determined. We have demonstrated genetic drift to be one of the main factors of the population dynamics in studied population. A significant genetic heterogeneity of HDs, both allelic and locus, was revealed in KChR