A note on Influence diagnostics in nonlinear mixed-effects elliptical models

This paper provides general matrix formulas for computing the score function, the (expected and observed) Fisher information and the $\Delta$ matrices (required for the assessment of local influence) for a quite general model which includes the one proposed by Russo et al. (2009). Additionally, we also present an expression for the generalized leverage. The matrix formulation has a considerable advantage, since although the complexity of the postulated model, all general formulas are compact, clear and have nice forms.Comment: Paper submitted for possible publication, 6 page

Improved maximum likelihood estimators in a heteroskedastic errors-in-variables model

This paper develops a bias correction scheme for a multivariate heteroskedastic errors-in-variables model. The applicability of this model is justified in areas such as astrophysics, epidemiology and analytical chemistry, where the variables are subject to measurement errors and the variances vary with the observations. We conduct Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the performance of the corrected estimators. The numerical results show that the bias correction scheme yields nearly unbiased estimates. We also give an application to a real data set.Comment: 12 pages. Statistical Paper

Bias correction in a multivariate normal regression model with general parameterization

This paper develops a bias correction scheme for a multivariate normal model under a general parameterization. In the model, the mean vector and the covariance matrix share the same parameters. It includes many important regression models available in the literature as special cases, such as (non)linear regression, errors-in-variables models, and so forth. Moreover, heteroscedastic situations may also be studied within our framework. We derive a general expression for the second-order biases of maximum likelihood estimates of the model parameters and show that it is always possible to obtain the second order bias by means of ordinary weighted lest-squares regressions. We enlighten such general expression with an errors-in-variables model and also conduct some simulations in order to verify the performance of the corrected estimates. The simulation results show that the bias correction scheme yields nearly unbiased estimators. We also present an empirical ilustration.Comment: 1 Figure, 17 page

The impact of measurement errors in the identification of regulatory networks

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There are several studies in the literature depicting measurement error in gene expression data and also, several others about regulatory network models. However, only a little fraction describes a combination of measurement error in mathematical regulatory networks and shows how to identify these networks under different rates of noise.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>This article investigates the effects of measurement error on the estimation of the parameters in regulatory networks. Simulation studies indicate that, in both time series (dependent) and non-time series (independent) data, the measurement error strongly affects the estimated parameters of the regulatory network models, biasing them as predicted by the theory. Moreover, when testing the parameters of the regulatory network models, p-values computed by ignoring the measurement error are not reliable, since the rate of false positives are not controlled under the null hypothesis. In order to overcome these problems, we present an improved version of the Ordinary Least Square estimator in independent (regression models) and dependent (autoregressive models) data when the variables are subject to noises. Moreover, measurement error estimation procedures for microarrays are also described. Simulation results also show that both corrected methods perform better than the standard ones (i.e., ignoring measurement error). The proposed methodologies are illustrated using microarray data from lung cancer patients and mouse liver time series data.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Measurement error dangerously affects the identification of regulatory network models, thus, they must be reduced or taken into account in order to avoid erroneous conclusions. This could be one of the reasons for high biological false positive rates identified in actual regulatory network models.</p