Overview of guidelines on iron chelation therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and transfusional iron overload

Between 2002 and 2008, a number of consensus statements and guidelines were developed by various groups around the world to educate healthcare professionals on the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), including the management of transfusional iron overload with iron chelation therapy. Guidelines have been developed by The Italian Society of Hematology, The UK MDS Guidelines Group, The Nagasaki Group, The National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and The MDS Foundation. These guidelines show that the approaches to managing iron overload in patients with MDS are region specific, differing in their recommendations for when iron chelation therapy should be initiated and strategies for the ongoing management of iron overload. The guidelines all agree that red blood cell transfusions are clinically beneficial to treat the symptomatic anemia in MDS, and that patients with low-risk MDS receiving transfusions are the most likely to benefit from iron chelation therapy

Japanese epidemiological survey with consensus statement on Japanese guidelines for treatment of iron overload in bone marrow failure syndromes

Many patients with bone marrow failure syndromes need frequent transfusions of red blood cells, and most of them eventually suffer from organ dysfunction induced by excessively accumulated iron. The only way to treat transfusion-induced iron overload is iron chelating therapy. However, most patients have not been treated effectively because daily/continuous administration of deferoxamine is difficult for outpatients. Recently, a novel oral iron chelator, deferasirox, has been developed, and introduction of the drug may help many patients benefit from iron chelation therapy. In this review, we will discuss the current status of iron overload in transfusion-dependent patients, and the development of Japanese guidelines for the treatment of iron overload in Japan, which were established by the National Research Group on Idiopathic Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes in Japan

Iron chelation therapy in the myelodysplastic syndromes and aplastic anemia: a review of experience in South Korea

Emerging clinical data indicate that transfusion-dependent patients with bone marrow-failure syndromes (BMFS) are at risk of the consequences of iron overload, including progressive damage to hepatic, endocrine, and cardiac organs. Despite the availability of deferoxamine (DFO) in Korea since 1998, data from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, aplastic anemia, and other BMFS show significant iron overload and damage to the heart and liver. The recent introduction of deferasirox, a once-daily, oral iron chelator, may improve the availability of iron chelation therapy to iron-overloaded patients, and improve compliance in patients who may otherwise find adherence to the DFO regimen difficult

Validation of the revised IPSS at transplant in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/transformed acute myelogenous leukemia receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective analysis of the EBMT chronic malignancies working party

The International Prognostic Scoring System has been revised (IPSS-R) to predict prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes at diagnosis. To validate the use of the IPSS-R assessed before transplant rather than at diagnosis we performed a retrospective analysis of the EBMT database. A total of 579 patients had sufficient information available to calculate IPSS-R at transplant. Median overall survival (OS) from transplant was significantly different according to IPSS-R: very low 23.6 months, low 55.0 months, intermediate 19.7 months, high 13.5 months, very high 7.8 months (P < 0.001). In a multivariate Cox model the following parameters were significant risk factors for OS: IPSS-R, graft source, age and prior treatment. Median relapse free survival also showed significant differences according to IPSS-R: very low: 23.6 months, low: 24.8 months, intermediate 10.6 months, high 7.9 months, very high 5.5 months (P < 0.001). Multivariate risk factors for relapse-free survival (RFS) were: IPSS-R, reduced intensity conditioning, graft source and prior treatment. A trend for an increased relapse incidence was noted for very high risk IPSS-R. We conclude that the IPSS-R at transplant is a useful prognostic score for predicting OS and RFS after transplantation, capturing both disease evolution and response to prior treatment before transplant

Rising antigenemia levels may be misleading in pre-emptive therapy of human cytomegalovirus infection in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients after show rising levels of antigenemia during pre-emptive ganciclovir treatment of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection. This raises some doubts about the therapeutic decisions to be taken. Three groups of HSCT recipients with HCMV infection undergoing anti-viral treatment were identified: group A, showing increasing antigenemia and decreasing viremia and DNAemia; group B, with simultaneous increases in antigenemia, viremia, and DNAemia; and group C, with decreasing levels of all 3 viral markers. Viral load, determined as levels of antigenemia, viremia and DNAemia, was monitored for 3 months post-transplantation in all groups. RESULTS: Group A HSCT recipients showed antigenemia peaks 2-11 days after the onset of treatment, reaching negative levels only 25-30 days thereafter, whereas viremia and DNAemia started to drop earlier. Group B patients, mainly including HSCT recipients with grade II-IV acute GvHD treated with steroids prior to and during antiviral treatment, showed increasing levels of all three viral parameters until 5-10 days after the start of treatment; the levels dropped to negative values 25-30 days thereafter. Group C patients, who acted as controls, progressively cleared virus from blood as an early result of antiviral therapy. Antigenemia is not the best assay to guide pre-emptive therapy. Group A patients, who have an isolated increase of antigenemia, do not require a change of the ongoing antiviral therapy. Whether better control of infection could be obtained in group B patients by either reducing immunosuppressive therapy (when possible) or adopting combination therapy remains to be determined