146 research outputs found

    Adjuvant Formulations Designed to Improve Swine Vaccine Stability: Application to PCV2 Vaccines

    Get PDF
    AbstractPorcine circovirus associated diseases (PCVADs) are economically important diseases of domestic pigs caused by porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2). PCV2 vaccination is usually performed with adjuvanted inactivated formulations and is necessary to control PCVADs and subclinical PCV2 related body weight losses in pig farming. An important issue with PCV2 vaccine formulation is that PCV2 antigenic media often have properties which destabilize vaccine formulations. Vaccine adjuvants are a key parameter in modern vaccination closely linked to galenic properties of vaccine formulations, and galenic stability is necessary to insure efficacy stability during vaccine shelf life. Here we show that especially designed formulations based on MontanideTM ISA 11R VG (Oil in water) and MontanideTM ESSAI Gel R (polymer) adjuvants are able to resist to very destabilizing antigenic media and conditions while keeping safety parameters and efficacy at requested levels

    Chiral Magnetic Effect in Hydrodynamic Approximation

    Full text link
    We review derivations of the chiral magnetic effect (ChME) in hydrodynamic approximation. The reader is assumed to be familiar with the basics of the effect. The main challenge now is to account for the strong interactions between the constituents of the fluid. The main result is that the ChME is not renormalized: in the hydrodynamic approximation it remains the same as for non-interacting chiral fermions moving in an external magnetic field. The key ingredients in the proof are general laws of thermodynamics and the Adler-Bardeen theorem for the chiral anomaly in external electromagnetic fields. The chiral magnetic effect in hydrodynamics represents a macroscopic manifestation of a quantum phenomenon (chiral anomaly). Moreover, one can argue that the current induced by the magnetic field is dissipation free and talk about a kind of "chiral superconductivity". More precise description is a ballistic transport along magnetic field taking place in equilibrium and in absence of a driving force. The basic limitation is exact chiral limit while the temperature--excitingly enough- does not seemingly matter. What is still lacking, is a detailed quantum microscopic picture for the ChME in hydrodynamics. Probably, the chiral currents propagate through lower-dimensional defects, like vortices in superfluid. In case of superfluid, the prediction for the chiral magnetic effect remains unmodified although the emerging dynamical picture differs from the standard one.Comment: 35 pages, prepared for a volume of the Springer Lecture Notes in Physics "Strongly interacting matter in magnetic fields" edited by D. Kharzeev, K. Landsteiner, A. Schmitt, H.-U. Ye

    The COMPASS Experiment at CERN

    Get PDF
    The COMPASS experiment makes use of the CERN SPS high-intensitymuon and hadron beams for the investigation of the nucleon spin structure and the spectroscopy of hadrons. One or more outgoing particles are detected in coincidence with the incoming muon or hadron. A large polarized target inside a superconducting solenoid is used for the measurements with the muon beam. Outgoing particles are detected by a two-stage, large angle and large momentum range spectrometer. The setup is built using several types of tracking detectors, according to the expected incident rate, required space resolution and the solid angle to be covered. Particle identification is achieved using a RICH counter and both hadron and electromagnetic calorimeters. The setup has been successfully operated from 2002 onwards using a muon beam. Data with a hadron beam were also collected in 2004. This article describes the main features and performances of the spectrometer in 2004; a short summary of the 2006 upgrade is also given.Comment: 84 papes, 74 figure

    High pTp_{T} non-photonic electron production in pp+pp collisions at s\sqrt{s} = 200 GeV

    Get PDF
    We present the measurement of non-photonic electron production at high transverse momentum (pT>p_T > 2.5 GeV/cc) in pp + pp collisions at s\sqrt{s} = 200 GeV using data recorded during 2005 and 2008 by the STAR experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC). The measured cross-sections from the two runs are consistent with each other despite a large difference in photonic background levels due to different detector configurations. We compare the measured non-photonic electron cross-sections with previously published RHIC data and pQCD calculations. Using the relative contributions of B and D mesons to non-photonic electrons, we determine the integrated cross sections of electrons (e++e2\frac{e^++e^-}{2}) at 3 GeV/c<pT< c < p_T <~10 GeV/cc from bottom and charm meson decays to be dσ(Be)+(BDe)dyeye=0{d\sigma_{(B\to e)+(B\to D \to e)} \over dy_e}|_{y_e=0} = 4.0±0.5\pm0.5({\rm stat.})±1.1\pm1.1({\rm syst.}) nb and dσDedyeye=0{d\sigma_{D\to e} \over dy_e}|_{y_e=0} = 6.2±0.7\pm0.7({\rm stat.})±1.5\pm1.5({\rm syst.}) nb, respectively.Comment: 17 pages, 17 figure

    Evolution of the differential transverse momentum correlation function with centrality in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV

    Get PDF
    We present first measurements of the evolution of the differential transverse momentum correlation function, {\it C}, with collision centrality in Au+Au interactions at sNN=200\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV. {\it C} exhibits a strong dependence on collision centrality that is qualitatively similar to that of number correlations previously reported. We use the observed longitudinal broadening of the near-side peak of {\it C} with increasing centrality to estimate the ratio of the shear viscosity to entropy density, η/s\eta/s, of the matter formed in central Au+Au interactions. We obtain an upper limit estimate of η/s\eta/s that suggests that the produced medium has a small viscosity per unit entropy.Comment: 7 pages, 4 figures, STAR paper published in Phys. Lett.

    Measurement of the Bottom contribution to non-photonic electron production in p+pp+p collisions at s\sqrt{s} =200 GeV

    Get PDF
    The contribution of BB meson decays to non-photonic electrons, which are mainly produced by the semi-leptonic decays of heavy flavor mesons, in p+pp+p collisions at s=\sqrt{s} = 200 GeV has been measured using azimuthal correlations between non-photonic electrons and hadrons. The extracted BB decay contribution is approximately 50% at a transverse momentum of pT5p_{T} \geq 5 GeV/cc. These measurements constrain the nuclear modification factor for electrons from BB and DD meson decays. The result indicates that BB meson production in heavy ion collisions is also suppressed at high pTp_{T}.Comment: 6 pages, 4 figures, accepted by PR

    Collins and Sivers asymmetries for pions and kaons in muon-deuteron DIS

    Full text link
    The measurements of the Collins and Sivers asymmetries of identified hadrons produced in deep-inelastic scattering of 160 GeV/c muons on a transversely polarised 6LiD target at COMPASS are presented. The results for charged pions and charged and neutral kaons correspond to all data available, which were collected from 2002 to 2004. For all final state particles both the Collins and Sivers asymmetries turn out to be small, compatible with zero within the statistical errors, in line with the previously published results for not identified charged hadrons, and with the expected cancellation between the u- and d-quark contributions.Comment: 16 pages, 9 figures, added author Efremov, calculated pure kaon asymmetries instead of those for experimental kaon/pion mixture (mainly error affected

    Double spin asymmetry in exclusive rho^0 muoproduction at COMPASS

    Full text link
    The longitudinal double spin asymmetry A_1^rho for exclusive leptoproduction of rho^0 mesons, mu + N -> mu + N + rho, is studied using the COMPASS 2002 and 2003 data. The measured reaction is incoherent exclusive rho^0 production on polarised deuterons. The Q^2 and x dependence of A_1^rho is presented in a wide kinematical range: 3x10^-3 < Q^2 < 7 (GeV/c)^2 and 5x10^-5 < x < 0.05. The presented results are the first measurements of A_1^rho at small Q2 (Q2 < 0.1 (GeV/c)^2) and small x (x < 3x10^-3). The asymmetry is in general compatible with zero in the whole kinematical range.Comment: 6 Figures, 15 pages, version 2 with updated author list, technical latex problem fixe

    Event-plane-dependent Dihadron Correlations With Harmonic Vn Subtraction In Au + Au Collisions At S Nn =200 Gev

    Get PDF
    STAR measurements of dihadron azimuthal correlations (Δφ) are reported in midcentral (20-60%) Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV as a function of the trigger particle's azimuthal angle relative to the event plane, φs=|φt-ψEP|. The elliptic (v2), triangular (v3), and quadratic (v4) flow harmonic backgrounds are subtracted using the zero yield at minimum (ZYAM) method. The results are compared to minimum-bias d+Au collisions. It is found that a finite near-side (|Δφ|π/2) correlation shows a modification from d+Au data, varying with φs. The modification may be a consequence of path-length-dependent jet quenching and may lead to a better understanding of high-density QCD. © 2014 American Physical Society.894DOE; U.S. Department of EnergyArsene, I., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 1. , (BRAHMS Collaboration), () NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02. 130;Back, B.B., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 28. , (PHOBOS Collaboration), () NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03. 084;Adams, J., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 102. , (STAR Collaboration), () NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03. 085;Adcox, K., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 184. , (PHENIX Collaboration),. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.086Heinz, U., Kolb, P.F., (2002) Nucl. Phys. A, 702, p. 269. , NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)00714-5Wang, X.-N., Gyulassy, M., (1992) Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, p. 1480. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1480Adler, S., (2003) Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, p. 072301. , (PHENIX Collaboration), () PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91. 072301;Adams, J., (2003) Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, p. 072304. , (STAR Collaboration), () PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.072304;Adler, C., (2003) Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, p. 082302. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.082302Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, p. 152301. , (STAR Collaboration), () PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.152301;Aggarwal, M.M., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 82, p. 024912. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.024912Adams, J., (2004) Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, p. 252301. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.252301Poskanzer, A.M., Voloshin, S.A., (1998) Phys. Rev. C, 58, p. 1671. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1671Alver, B., (2008) Phys. Rev. C, 77, p. 014906. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.014906Feng, A., (2008), Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Particle Physics, CCNU, (unpublished);Konzer, J., (2013), Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, (unpublished)Agakishiev, H., (STAR Collaboration), arXiv:1010.0690Ackermann, K.H., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Meth., A499, p. 624. , (STAR Collaboration),. NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01960-5Ackermann, K.H., (1999) Nucl. Phys. A, 661, p. 681. , (STAR Collaboration),. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)85117-3Adams, J., (2004) Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, p. 112301. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.112301Borghini, N., Dinh, P.M., Ollitrault, J.Y., (2000) Phys. Rev. C, 62, p. 034902. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.62.034902Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Rev. C, 72, p. 014904. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.014904Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 79, p. 034909. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.034909Bielcikova, J., (2004) Phys. Rev C, 69, p. 021901. , (R) () PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.69.021901;Konzer, J., Wang, F., (2009) Nucl. Instrum. Meth., A606, p. 713. , NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/j.nima.2009.05.011Mishra, A.P., (2008) Phys. Rev. C, 77, p. 064902. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.064902;Alver, B., Roland, G., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81, p. 054905. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.054905Alver, B., Roland, G., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 82, p. 039903. , 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.039903Xu, J., Ko, C.M., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 84, p. 014903. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.014903Petersen, H., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 82, p. 041901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.041901Takahashi, J., (2009) Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, p. 242301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.242301;Andrade, R.P.G., (2012) Phys. Lett. B, 712, p. 226. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.04.044;Qian, W.L., (2013) Phys. Rev. C, 87, p. 014904. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.014904Schenke, B., Jeon, S., Gale, C., (2011) Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, p. 042301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.042301;Qiu, Z., Heinz, U.W., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 84, p. 024911. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.024911;Song, H., (2011) Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, p. 192301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.192301;Schenke, B., Jeon, S., Gale, C., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 85, p. 024901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.024901;Schenke, B., Tribedy, P., Venugopalan, R., (2012) Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, p. 252301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.252301Adare, A., (2011) Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, p. 252301. , (PHENIX Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.252301Adamczyk, L., (2013) Phys. Rev. C, 88, p. 014904. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.014904Abelev, B.I., (2008) Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, p. 252301. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.252301Teaney, D., Yan, L., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 83, p. 064904. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.064904Pandit, Y., (2013) J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 446, p. 012012. , (STAR Collaboration),. 1742-6596 10.1088/1742-6596/446/1/012012Ajitanand, N.N., (2005) Phys. Rev. C, 72, p. 011902. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.011902Agakishiev, G., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 86, p. 064902. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.064902Adler, C., (2002) Phys. Rev. C, 66, p. 034904. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.66.034904Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 80, p. 064912. , (STAR Collaboration), () PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.064912;Abelev, B.I., (2010) Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, p. 022301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.022301Adler, S.S., (2006) Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, p. 052301. , (PHENIX Collaboration), () PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97. 052301;Adare, A., (2008) Phys. Rev. C, 78, p. 014901. , (PHENIX Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.014901Stoecker, H., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 750, p. 121. , NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.12.074;Casalderrey-Solana, J., Shuryak, E.V., Teaney, D., (2005) J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 27, p. 22. , 1742-6588 10.1088/1742-6596/27/1/003;Ruppert, J., Müller, B., (2005) Phys. Lett. B, 618, p. 123. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.04.075Betz, B., (2010) Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, p. 222301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.222301;Ma, G.L., Wang, X.N., (2011) Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, p. 162301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.162301Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, p. 052302. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.052302Adamczyk, L., (2014) Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, p. 122301. , (STAR Collaboration),. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.12230

    The Formation of a Dispersed Gas System in the Flotation Cells

    No full text
    The use of flotation methods for wastewater treatment is due to their advantages in comparison with other methods of gravity separation, for example, sedimentation. The advantages of flotation water treatment methods include the high speed of the separation process, the ability to extract impurities that are close in density to water, environmental friendliness. Flotation methods are based on adsorptive bubble separation processes. Accordingly, the performance of a particular flotator directly depends on the conditions for the implementation of these processes in a particular flotation cell. The aim of the research was to study the relationship between the dispersed gas phase (DGP) and the ratio of the geometric dimensions of the flotation cells based on the proposed shape indicator of the flotation cell. Studies performed on the experimental model of the flotator have established a significant influence of theshape indicator of the flotation cell on such important indicators of the adsorptive bubble separation processes as gas-filling and the DGP floating speed. The evaluation of different forms of flotation cells, in relation to the properties of extracted bubble-particle complexes is given
    corecore