2 research outputs found
Π‘ΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎ- ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΒ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°
Topic. The article examines the socio-economic and political-legal characteristics of civil society formulated by leading Western scholars and approbated in the course of civil self-organization in Eastern Europe. We analyse recent Western theories of civil society that are relevant in describing processes in the modern Russian society, developing in a dynamic relationship between tolerance and paternalism overcoming the deficit of democracy and peopleβs participation.Purpose. The purpose of this study was the analysis of the relevant normative theories of civil society that sets the socio-economic and political context of the processes of self-organization in the modern world.Methodology and results. The authors formulate the concept of civil society based on the clarification of its content, key actors and their mutual relationships; discuss the role of the welfare state and social capital in the system of factors of development of civil society; find out the specifics of the functioning of civil society in the Russian Federation.Significant attention is paid to the rationale for such institutions of civil society as market economy, rights and freedoms of the citizen. They are defined as setting the outer frame of the development of civil society, because namely functioning institutions and their harmonious interaction ensure the development of civil self-organization.The market is treated as forming factor of institutional conditions for the development of civil society in the postSoviet space. The article offers possible directions for further improvement of civil society institutions in their interconnection and interaction. A prominent place is given to the financial situation of non-profit organizations (NPOs) as a key institution of civil society, the specificity of formation of their income, grant support for NGOs from the Russian Federation and the legislation on socially oriented NGOs.Conclusion. We conclude that there are the positive trends in the field of financing NGOs from the state; selective expert grant support of effective NGOs in 2017 is interpreted as a factor of stabilization of socio-political life in Russia.ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ. ΠΒ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°, ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π²Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΒ Π°ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π²Β Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²Β ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Ρ
ΠΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡ. ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°, ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π²Β ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅, ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ Π²Β ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΒ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΌ, ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°ΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΒ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ. Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΉ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°, Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²Β ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅.ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΠΈΒ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΒ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ Π²ΡΡΡΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ
Π°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π°Β ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΈΡ
Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈΒ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ; Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΒ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π° Π²Β ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°; Π²ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π²Β Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ.Π‘ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΎΠ² Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ°, ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΈΒ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ½Π°. ΠΠ½ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΒ ΠΈΡ
Π³Π°ΡΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ. Π ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΊ ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅. ΠΒ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΎΠ² Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π²Β ΠΈΡ
Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ ΠΈΒ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ
. ΠΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ (ΠΠΠ) ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠ° Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°, ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠ΅ ΠΠΠ ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ Π Π€, Π°Β ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Ρ ΠΎΒ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΠΠ (Π‘ΠΒ ΠΠΠ).ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄. ΠΠ΅Π»Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΒ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡ
Π²Β ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π°; ΠΈΠ·Π±ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π‘Π ΠΠΠ Π²Β 2017 Π³. ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ Π²Β Π Π€
Socio-economic, Political, Legal and Financial Parameters of Civil Society
Topic. The article examines the socio-economic and political-legal characteristics of civil society formulated by leading Western scholars and approbated in the course of civil self-organization in Eastern Europe. We analyse recent Western theories of civil society that are relevant in describing processes in the modern Russian society, developing in a dynamic relationship between tolerance and paternalism overcoming the deficit of democracy and peopleβs participation.Purpose. The purpose of this study was the analysis of the relevant normative theories of civil society that sets the socio-economic and political context of the processes of self-organization in the modern world.Methodology and results. The authors formulate the concept of civil society based on the clarification of its content, key actors and their mutual relationships; discuss the role of the welfare state and social capital in the system of factors of development of civil society; find out the specifics of the functioning of civil society in the Russian Federation.Significant attention is paid to the rationale for such institutions of civil society as market economy, rights and freedoms of the citizen. They are defined as setting the outer frame of the development of civil society, because namely functioning institutions and their harmonious interaction ensure the development of civil self-organization.The market is treated as forming factor of institutional conditions for the development of civil society in the postSoviet space. The article offers possible directions for further improvement of civil society institutions in their interconnection and interaction. A prominent place is given to the financial situation of non-profit organizations (NPOs) as a key institution of civil society, the specificity of formation of their income, grant support for NGOs from the Russian Federation and the legislation on socially oriented NGOs.Conclusion. We conclude that there are the positive trends in the field of financing NGOs from the state; selective expert grant support of effective NGOs in 2017 is interpreted as a factor of stabilization of socio-political life in Russia