22 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Persistence of Allosensitization after Islet Allograft Failure
Recommended from our members
Opiate vs non-opiate prescription medication for pain control after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis
Research indicates that most providers give opiates after endoscopic sinonasal surgery. The effectiveness of non-opiate medications after sinonasal surgery is poorly understood and most studies do not assess medication failure. This study compares oral opiate, oral opiate and topical steroid, and oral non-opiate pain control. Patient call-backs are used as a proxy for pain medication failure.
This study compares three medication regiments after sinonasal surgery for 180 adults with chronic rhinosinusitis. Patients were instructed to take acetaminophen for mild pain. For moderate/severe pain, patients used: 1) oxycodone-acetaminophen, 2) oxycodone-acetaminophen + budesonide nasal rinses, or 3) meloxicam + acetaminophen. Patients were instructed to call clinic if pain was not controlled. Descriptive statistics compared cohorts. Chi-square tests compared call-backs between cohorts. Logistic regression adjusted for baseline differences in covariates, comorbidities, and operative sites.
Cohorts had similar age, sex distribution, disease features, and extent of surgery. The meloxicam cohort had less subjects with pain disorders. The oxycodone cohort had less subjects with diabetes, septoplasty, and turbinate reduction. After adjusting for baseline differences and using oxycodone as the reference group (n = 50), the odds of calling clinic for poorly controlled pain was 0.18 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.05–0.6) in the meloxicam cohort (n = 45) and 0.19 (95% CI:0.07–0.5) in the oxycodone + budesonide rinses cohort (n = 85).
In this study, both meloxicam and oxycodone + budesonide rinses were more effective at controlling pain after sinonasal surgery than oxycodone alone
Recommended from our members
Chronic Rhinosinusitis Disease Disparity in the South Florida Hispanic Population
Objectives/HypothesisThe role of social determinants of health in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is poorly characterized. Limited research examining CRS health disparities indicates that minority status is associated with worse CRS. However, many of these studies are retrospective or performed in populations without substantial ethnic minorities. Rhinologists need to characterize existing CRS disease disparities to develop targeted strategies for improving care in these populations. This prospective study assesses preoperative CRS disease burden in South Florida (SFL) Hispanic and non‐Hispanic patients and examines potential factors contributing CRS disease disparities.Study DesignProspective cohort study.MethodsThe prospective cohort study included consecutive patients having primary endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for CRS between September 2019 and February 2020 with complete preoperative data. Data were collected in clinic and surgery. Descriptive statistics compare Hispanic and non‐Hispanic cohorts. Linear regression adjusts for confounders. Relative risk (RR) compared CRS severity markers.ResultsThirty‐eight Hispanic and 56 non‐Hispanic patients met inclusion criteria. Age, sex, CT scores, insurance payer, and comorbidities were similar between cohorts. Hispanics presented with worse 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) (55; SD = 18) compared to non‐Hispanics (37; SD = 22) (P < .001). Hispanics tended to have a higher risk of severe CRS markers, including nasal polyps RR = 2.5 (95% CI: 1.0–5.9), neo‐osteogenesis RR = 1.6 (95% CI: 0.5–4.7), extended procedures (i.e., draft III) RR = 2.97 (95% CI: 1.0–9.1), and tissue eosinophilia RR = 1.46 (95% CI: 0.6–3.5). Hispanics reported longer sinonasal symptom duration.ConclusionsSFL hispanic patients presenting for primary ESS have worse sinonasal disease burden. SFL Hispanics have markers of greater CRS severity and report longer delays before receiving CRS care. These factors may contribute to increased sinonasal disease burden in Hispanic patients.Level of Evidence3 Laryngoscope, 131:2659–2665, 202
Recommended from our members
Electronic Decision support for Improvement of Contemporary Therapy for Stroke Prevention
Despite ample clinical trial data demonstrating that oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment is highly effective in reducing stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), OAC treatment remains underutilized in current clinical practice. Targeting hospitalist and emergency department providers with electronic decision support represents a potential quality improvement opportunity in the use of OAC medication in AF patients.
We conducted a 3-center study in which 2 sites utilized an electronic alert (EA) embedded in the electronic health record and 1 site provided usual care. The EA calculated the CHA2DS2-VASc score for clinicians. Patients were tracked following discharge from either the emergency department or hospital. We hypothesized that the EA would increase the rate of OAC use by 15% compared to usual care, with a study sample size of 360 patients. Study exclusions included severe heart valve disease, advanced renal disease, and severe dementia. The primary endpoint was OAC use at the time of hospital discharge or 30 days after hospital discharge (whichever was the last observation recorded).
Among 309 patients included for analysis (mean age 70.2 years), the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.5. The frequency of OAC use at follow-up at the usual care hospital was 55.9% (95% confidence interval 47.4-67.9). At the 2 EA sites, the rate of OAC use at the last observation point was 43.9% (P = .06). Aspirin use at follow-up was similar at the usual care site and the EA sites (53.8% versus 46.3%). The rate of OAC use in patients greater than 75 years was 60.0% in the usual care site and 48.4% (P = .09) at the EA sites.
The EA in our study was not sufficient to ameliorate therapeutic inertia in the use of OAC for stroke prevention in AF
Long-term Persistence of Allosensitization After Islet Allograft Failure
Allosensitization has been reported after discontinuation of immunosuppression following graft failure in islet transplantation (ITx) recipients, though duration of its persistence is unknown.
We evaluated 35 patients with type 1 diabetes who received ITx, including 17 who developed graft failure (ITx alone, n=13; ITx plus bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cells, n=4) and 18 with persistent graft function. Panel reactive antibody (PRA) was measured yearly for the duration of graft function within 1 year after graft failure at enrollment and yearly thereafter.
In ITx alone graft failure patients, 61% (8/13) were PRA-positive at 6 years postgraft failure, and 46% (6/13) developed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA to 2 ± 1 donors) during follow up. The degree of sensitization was variable (cPRA ranging between 22% and 100% after graft failure). Allosensitization persisted for 7 to 15 years. Three subjects (3/13) were not allosensitized. In ITx plus bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cell recipients, cPRA-positivity (88% to 98%) and DSA-positivity persisted for 15 years in 75% (3/4) of subjects.
Allosensitization was minimal while subjects remained on immunosuppression but after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy the majority of subjects (77%) became allosensitized with persistence of PRA positivity for up to 15 years. Persistence of allosensitization in this patient population is of clinical importance as it may result in longer transplant waiting-list times for identification of a suitable donor in case of requiring a subsequent transplant
Recommended from our members
Abstract 14353: Feminizing Hormone Therapy and Subclinical Indicators of CVD Risk in Transgender Women With HIV
Introduction: Transgender women (TW) are at higher risk of HIV infection compared to cisgender groups and HIV is associated with accelerated cardiovascular disease (CVD) complications. A high propo..
Infection with SARS-CoV-2 is associated with menstrual irregularities among women of reproductive age.
BackgroundBiological and psychological mechanisms may be responsible for menstrual irregularities occurring among women during the COVID-19 pandemic.Study designFrom January 2019 to September 2021, women (18- to 45-years-old and not using hormonal contraception) were recruited in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Cross-sectional, self-report surveys collected data on menstrual irregularities, COVID-19 vaccination, stress, depression, and loneliness. A EUA approved rapid test assay using whole blood measured SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests described menstrual irregularities among women recruited before versus after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and with detectable versus undetectable SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. A logistic regression examined the relationship between the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies and menstrual irregularities controlling for age, stress, depression, and loneliness.ResultsAmong 182 women enrolled, 73 were enrolled after pandemic onset, and 36 provided vaccination data. Having detectable SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies was associated with a higher percentage of menstrual irregularities among unvaccinated women (0% vs. 39%, p = .026) and among all women regardless of vaccination status (31% vs. 5%; p = .005). Adjusting for age and psychological variables, the odds of menstrual irregularities were 7.03 times (95% CI [1.39, 35.60]; p = .019) higher among women with detectable antibodies compared to women without detectable antibodies. Neither enrollment date, age, nor psychological factors were associated to menstrual irregularities.ConclusionsBiological mechanisms related to SARS-CoV-2 infection may be responsible for irregular menstruation and should be further examined to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women's health
A small cluster randomised clinical trial to improve health outcomes among Argentine patients disengaged from HIV care
BACKGROUND: Patients disengaged from HIV care, e.g., missed medication pick-ups, not attending physician visits, account for ≥70% of new HIV infections. Re-engaging and sustaining engagement is essential to controlling the HIV pandemic. This study tested a physician-delivered evidence-based intervention, Motivational Interviewing (MI), to improve health outcomes, adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART), HIV virologic suppression, CD(4)+ count, retention in HIV care, and self-efficacy among patients disengaged from care in Argentina. METHODS: Regional clinics (n = 6) were randomised to condition, MI Intervention or Enhanced Standard of Care (ESOC), and recruited N = 360 patients disengaged from HIV care. ART adherence, HIV RNA viral load, CD(4)+ count retention, and self-efficacy were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24-months. Indirect effects from condition to main outcomes were examined using patient–provider relationship as a mediator. The study was a cluster-randomised clinical trial entitled Conexiones y Opciones Positivas en la Argentina 2 (COPA(2)) and was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02846350. FINDINGS: Participants were an average age of 39·15 (SD = 10·96), 51% were women; intervention participants were older (p = ·019), and more ESOC participants were women (60% vs. 42%, p = 0·001). Using mixed models, the intervention had no effect on ART adherence over time by condition on HIV RNA viral load, CD(4)+ count retention, or self-efficacy. However, analysing mediated paths, there was an indirect effect of condition on ART adherence (B = 0·188, p = 0·009), HIV viral load (B = −0·095, P = 0·027), and self-efficacy (B = 0·063, P = 0·001), suggesting the intervention was associated with improved patient–provider relationships, which was in turn associated with increased ART adherence, lower HIV viral load, and higher self-efficacy. INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest that physician-delivered MI may enhance the patient-provider relationship, self-efficacy, and ART adherence, and reduced HIV viral load in patients disengaged from HIV care. However, these findings are preliminary due to the small number of clusters randomised, and replication is warranted. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health
Recommended from our members
A Syndemic Approach to Explore Factors Associated with Bacterial Vaginosis
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common genital infection in women and is associated with an increased risk of sexually transmitted infections and HIV. This study uses a syndemic approach to evaluate factors associated with BV. Non-pregnant, HIV-negative, sexually active, cis-gender women aged 18-45 years living in Miami, Florida were recruited from Nov.2018- Jun.2021. Participants completed a sociodemographic and behavioral questionnaire along with gynecological examinations. BV was diagnosed by Amsel criteria and confirmed by a Nugent score >= 4. A syndemic score was calculated as the sum of factors associated with BV. The association between syndemic score and BV was assessed using logistic regression. Of 166 women included, 60.2% had BV. Race, ethnicity, education, vaginal sex, recent cannabis use, and reasons for intravaginal practices were included in the syndemic score. Higher odds of BV were found in women with a score of >= 3 compared to women with a score of 0/1. A higher syndemic score was associated with increased odds of having BV. Multilevel interventions to decrease BV are needed to decrease women's risk of acquiring HIV
Recommended from our members