Speech-Mediated Retention in Dyslexics

Dyslexics (6 to 9 yr. old) and a control group of 12 normal readers (second-graders) were tested on a memory task with rhyming and non-rhyming items. The most important finding is that both groups were penalized by rhyme, indicating speech coding. It was observed that the dyslexics were not less penalized by rhyme than were controls. The present results are compared with those of other recent studies.Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Contribution expérimentale à l'étude des ajustements préparatoires à court terme

Doctorat en sciences psychologiquesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublishe

Contribution expérimentale à l'étude des ajustements préparatoires à court terme

Doctorat en sciences psychologiquesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublishe

The time course of preparation after a first peak: some constraints of reacting mechanisms

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Psychologie du développement: théorie et travaux pratiques

2e candid. Psychol. Postgraduat pédagogie, Opt. 2e candid. Phil. Moraleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/published

Psychologie du développement :Théorie et travaux pratiques

2e candid. Psychol. Postgraduat Pédagogie, Opt. 2e candid. Phil. Morale - PSYC 014info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Contraintes dans le développement de la perception de sons de la parole: quelques considérations concernant l'enfant sourd

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Le langage gestuel: analyse de sa structure et de son incidence sur le développement de l'enfant sourd

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Sequential Effects of Foreperiod Duration as a function of the Frequency of Foreperiod Repetitions.

An examination of sequential effects of foreperiod duration in reaction time tasks suggests a description of the subjects' strategy in terms of a tendency to expect foreperiod repetitions. The present experiment examined what factors influence this basic tendency. Two foreperiod distributions differing in the frequency of repetitions (33 and 66%) but with the same frequency of individual foreperiods were used. In both cases faster reaction times coincided with foreperiod repetitions. Important differences appeared nevertheless between the two foreperiod distributions; reaction times for repetitions were faster when repetitions were frequent than when they were not, and repetitions of the same fore-period more than once led to further reaction-time decreases only when foreperiod repetitions were frequent. The tendency to expect repetitions varied from trial to trial in a way which depended on long-term factors such as the frequency with which the expected foreperiod duration coincided with the foreperiod actually presented.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Psychologie génétique: théorie et travaux pratiques

2e candidature en psychologie ;postgraduat en pédagogie ;option 2e candidature en philosophie moraleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/published