3 research outputs found

    Restoring giant kokopu (Galaxias argenteus) populations in Hamilton's urban streams

    Get PDF
    In this study, options for restoring fish populations in Hamilton City (37.47'S, 175.19'E) were explored. Habitat and fish populations in Hamilton urban streams were manipulated using a two-fold experimental design. Firstly, habitat was enhanced in ten urban streams with three continuous treatments in a 60-m reach at each site (20 m with 10 ponga logs, 20 m with 20 hollow clay pipes, and 20 m with no added structure). Secondly, juvenile farm-reared giant kokopu (Galaxias argenteus), were stocked into five of the enhanced stream sections. Giant kokopu are threatened and occur naturally in Hamilton urban streams in sparse populations. The abundance of wild fish was monitored before and after enhancement and fish release from November 2006 to November 2007. Stocked fish were monitored for eight months, from April to November 2007. Over this time electric fishing was conducted three times, trap nets (Gee minnow and fyke nets) were set monthly and spotlighting was conducted monthly at three release sites where water clarity allowed. Anticipated outcomes of this research were; to determine whether giant kokopu abundance in Hamilton urban streams is limited by recruitment or by habitat, and to assist with the development of methods to restore fish populations in Hamilton City urban streams. Logs used as enhancement structures in Hamilton urban streams provided more stable habitat for fish and created more suitable microhabitat than pipe structures. Pipes moved considerably during high flows, and their instability made them less effective at providing habitat. Within the study sites there appeared to be complex interactions with turbidity, stream width and depth, which complicated the effect of the habitat structures. The limited replication and variability among sites contributed to statistically insignificant results using analysis of variance. Retention and recapture rates of stocked juvenile giant kokopu were greatest at Site M11, where the stream was narrow, shallow, clear and had lower numbers and biomass of shortfin eels, compared to other survey sites. Marked and released giant kokopu were retained in the release reaches at four of the five sites, for a minimum of four months, and exhibited substantial growth. Daily growth of juvenile giant kokopu ranged from 0.19 to 0.33 mm day-1 and from 0.03 to 0.11 g day-1, exhibiting substantial growth over winter. Giant kokopu appeared to have a slight bias to the log section of enhanced habitat, but habitat selection appeared to be overwhelmingly controlled by initial habitat selection. The stocking of farm-reared fish into urban streams was largely successful, but the success of the habitat enhancement was variable and further work is required to determine better techniques for habitat enhancement in these urban environments. It is concluded that releasing farm-reared giant kokopu can be used to restore populations especially where recruitment limitations control fish abundance and diversity

    Ecological values of Hamilton urban streams (North Island, New Zealand): constraints and opportunities for restoration

    Get PDF
    Urban streams globally are characterised by degraded habitat conditions and low aquatic biodiversity, but are increasingly becoming the focus of restoration activities. We investigated habitat quality, ecological function, and fish and macroinvertebrate community composition of gully streams in Hamilton City, New Zealand, and compared these with a selection of periurban sites surrounded by rural land. A similar complement of fish species was found at urban and periurban sites, including two threatened species, with only one introduced fish widespread (Gambusia affinis). Stream macroinvertebrate community metrics indicated low ecological condition at most urban and periurban sites, but highlighted the presence of one high value urban site with a fauna dominated by sensitive taxa. Light-trapping around seepages in city gullies revealed the presence of several caddisfly species normally associated with native forest, suggesting that seepage habitats can provide important refugia for some aquatic insects in urban environments. Qualitative measures of stream habitat were not significantly different between urban and periurban sites, but urban streams had significantly lower hydraulic function and higher biogeochemical function than periurban streams. These functional differences are thought to reflect, respectively, (1) the combined effects of channel modification and stormwater hydrology, and (2) the influence of riparian vegetation providing shade and enhancing habitat in streams. Significant relationships between some macroinvertebrate community metrics and riparian vegetation buffering and bank protection suggest that riparian enhancement may have beneficial ecological outcomes in some urban streams. Other actions that may contribute to urban stream restoration goals include an integrated catchment approach to resolving fish passage issues, active reintroduction of wood to streams to enhance cover and habitat heterogeneity, and seeding of depauperate streams with native migratory fish to help initiate natural recolonisation

    The distribution of fish in the urban gully system streams of Hamilton City

    Full text link
    The distribution of fish in the urban gully system streams of Hamilton City was investigated using various methods of fishing. Fishing methods used in the city wide survey included trap netting using Gee minnow and fyke nets, electric fishing, and spotlighting at selected sites. Water quality and habitat parameters were assessed at each of the sites to add information to instream freshwater fish assemblages (i.e., preferred habitat). Culverts were assessed downstream of all sites because, native freshwater fish of New Zealand are largely migratory, having both freshwater and marine life histories. Freshwater fish migrate between habitats, therefore barriers to swimming fish passage may determine the presence of fish species at inland sites. Pest fish were less common than native fish in this survey, although they represent a greater proportion of the fish caught, because the small pest fish mosquitofish are prolific breeders and were present in very high numbers at a few sites. This study has shown that some urban streams can support diverse fish assemblages where water quality and habitat conditions permit. Threatened species were found to be present in streams previously thought of as supporting little stream life with low fish habitat or biodiversity value. The need for restoration and management of these streams is vital if the diversity and distribution of native fish is to be maintained
    corecore